Istara
CLAUDE.md15 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Everything in AGENTS.md applies. This file adds only what is specific to Claude agents. Codex and other harnesses: the browser and design rules below apply to you too. All non-trivial work in Istara (features, fixes touching more than one surface, spine, auth, pi, CI, releases) runs through the build-stream and compass-forge skills: frame with the owner → Compass Forge spec → plan → execute → verify → ship, recorded in one lifecycle file under docs/build-stream/. - Do not use subagents…
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- affinity-mappingSkill
- empathy-mappingSkill
- hmw-statementsSkill
- journey-mappingSkill
- jtbd-analysisSkill
- kappa-thematic-analysisSkill
- persona-creationSkill
- prioritization-matrixSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- taxonomy-generatorSkill
- thematic-analysisSkill
- user-flow-mappingSkill
- design-system-auditSkill
- handoff-documentationSkill
- longitudinal-trackingSkill
- nps-analysisSkill
- regression-impactSkill
- repository-curationSkill
- research-retroSkill
- stakeholder-presentationSkill
- sus-umux-scoringSkill
- task-analysis-quantSkill
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- card-sortingSkill
- cognitive-walkthroughSkill
- concept-testingSkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- heuristic-evaluationSkill
- prototype-feedbackSkill
- tree-testingSkill
- usability-testingSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
- accessibility-auditSkill
- analytics-reviewSkill
- channel-research-deploymentSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- contextual-inquirySkill
- desk-researchSkill
- diary-studiesSkill
- field-studiesSkill
- interview-question-generatorSkill
- stakeholder-interviewsSkill
- survey-ai-detectionSkill
- survey-designSkill
- survey-generatorSkill
- user-interviewsSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
All non-trivial work in Istara (features, fixes touching more than one surface, spine, auth, pi, CI, releases) runs through the …
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not use subagents or multi-agent pipelines (the owner's standing rule).
- Distinctive: line 33
Prefer the browser extension over Playwright for inspection: use the Claude in Chrome tools (or the in-app Browser pane) to navigate, …
- Very specific: line 51
Use Anthropic's design skills where they fit: artifact-design / dataviz for reports, benchmark dashboards, and charts.
- Distinctive: line 57
Read-only recon never edits.
- Distinctive: line 58
Never let a subagent stop, remove, or prune Docker containers or volumes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Istara — Claude Code instructions
@AGENTS.md
Everything in AGENTS.md applies. This file adds only what is specific to Claude agents.
Codex and other harnesses: the browser and design rules below apply to you too.
Delivery: build-stream + Compass Forge, one agent
All non-trivial work in Istara (features, fixes touching more than one surface, spine, auth,
pi, CI, releases) runs through the build-stream and compass-forge skills: frame
with the owner → Compass Forge spec → plan → execute → verify → ship, recorded in one
lifecycle file under docs/build-stream/.
- Do not use subagents or multi-agent pipelines (the owner's standing rule). Review coverage is recorded honestly as self-only unless the owner arranges an independent review.
- Trivial edits (typos, single-file docs, lookups) may skip the lifecycle file but still follow
the Compass Forge pre/post-edit protocol in
AGENTS.md§2. - Branching follows
AGENTS.md§3.
Definition of done
- CF impact + test-impact read before editing; gates run after.
- Targeted automated tests pass (
TESTING.md"Choosing Tests For A Change"). - The change is exercised in the UI as a real user would — see below — including an agentic chat turn on both engines when chat, tools, models, or the spine are affected.
- Scenario added/updated in
tests/simulation/scenarios/; evidence attached to the CF task. Tech.md, personas, feature docs, and telemetry/benchmark results updated when their CI obligations trigger.
UI verification
- Prefer the browser extension over Playwright for inspection: use the Claude in Chrome
tools (or the in-app Browser pane) to navigate, click, fill, read the accessibility tree,
and check console/network while walking the user flow. Codex agents use their browser
extension equivalently. Playwright is for the committed, repeatable scenarios in
tests/simulation/, not for ad-hoc inspection. - Target a disposable QA stack (
scripts/istara-qa.sh up --run-id <branch>-<date> --profile ui), never the protectednever-delete-official-*containers. Starting servers or making live model calls still needs owner permission (AGENTS.md§9). - Walk every menu and sub-menu the change can reach: happy path, empty/loading/error states, role differences, light/dark, 375px width, keyboard focus. Report what you saw, with screenshots, not what the code implies.
Design work
- Load the
interface-designskill for any UI change, audit, or visual debug; followDESIGN.mdtokens (Tailwind primitives →globals.csssemantic variables →docs/design/tokens.jsonviapython scripts/export_design_tokens.py) and runpython scripts/check_a11y_contrast.py. - Use Anthropic's design skills where they fit:
artifact-design/datavizfor reports, benchmark dashboards, and charts;designfor mockups before building.
Subagent hygiene
- Give subagents file paths and the exact question; ask for conclusions, not dumps.
- Read-only recon never edits; implementers own disjoint files.
- Never let a subagent stop, remove, or prune Docker containers or volumes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

