empathy-mapping
Skill15 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create Says/Thinks/Does/Feels quadrants from interview data, identify contradictions.
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- affinity-mappingSkill
- hmw-statementsSkill
- journey-mappingSkill
- jtbd-analysisSkill
- kappa-thematic-analysisSkill
- persona-creationSkill
- prioritization-matrixSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- taxonomy-generatorSkill
- thematic-analysisSkill
- user-flow-mappingSkill
- design-system-auditSkill
- handoff-documentationSkill
- longitudinal-trackingSkill
- nps-analysisSkill
- regression-impactSkill
- repository-curationSkill
- research-retroSkill
- stakeholder-presentationSkill
- sus-umux-scoringSkill
- task-analysis-quantSkill
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- card-sortingSkill
- cognitive-walkthroughSkill
- concept-testingSkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- heuristic-evaluationSkill
- prototype-feedbackSkill
- tree-testingSkill
- usability-testingSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
- accessibility-auditSkill
- analytics-reviewSkill
- channel-research-deploymentSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- contextual-inquirySkill
- desk-researchSkill
- diary-studiesSkill
- field-studiesSkill
- interview-question-generatorSkill
- stakeholder-interviewsSkill
- survey-ai-detectionSkill
- survey-designSkill
- survey-generatorSkill
- user-interviewsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Create Says/Thinks/Does/Feels quadrants from interview data, identify contradictions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Empathy Mapping
Create Says/Thinks/Does/Feels quadrants from interview data, identify contradictions.
Phase
Double Diamond: Define
Type
Qualitative research method
Workflow
- Plan — Generate a research plan with objectives, methods, and timeline
- Execute — Process input data (files, context) through the analysis
- Validate — Self-check findings against sources, score confidence
- Report — Structured output with nuggets, facts, insights, recommendations
Input
- Project files (PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV, MD)
- Project and company context (auto-loaded)
- User instructions and task context
Output
- Nuggets with source references
- Facts verified against evidence
- Insights with confidence scoring
- Actionable recommendations with priority/effort ratings
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.