dispatching-parallel-agents
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Dispatch one focused agent per independent problem and run them concurrently. Use when facing 2+ tasks with no shared state and no sequential dependency — several unrelated test failures, multiple broken subsystems, a batch of independent issues. Each agent gets a self-contained brief and returns a summary; you review for conflicts and integrate.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- afawfawffaf/my-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 19 projects that use this
kntismSkillcondition-based-waiting
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Also in 3 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillcontext-driven-development
Use this skill when working with Conductor's context-driven
Also in 3 projects that use this
EvezArtSkillanalytics-dashboard
User behavior tracking and analytics dashboards
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
- koaning/wigglystuff★ 455same name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- api-designSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- councilSkill
- document-toolkitSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- gui-input-automationSkill
- humanizeSkill
- hyprland-controlSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- issue-to-prSkill
- litreviewSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- rust-reviewSkill
- screen-captureSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- shadcn-auditSkill
- spec-to-issuesSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- teachSkill
- unslopSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- visual-computer-use-loopSkill
- writing-flowSkill
- writing-plansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
When you have several unrelated problems (different test files, different subsystems, different issues), one-at-a-time wastes time.
- Distinctive: line 26
Don't: when failures are related (fixing one may fix others — investigate together), you need full system context, you don't yet know …
- Distinctive: line 83
Read each summary · check for conflicts · run the full suite · spot-check.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dispatching Parallel Agents
You delegate work to agents with isolated context. Craft each brief precisely so they stay focused, and keep your own context for coordination — they never inherit your session history.
When you have several unrelated problems (different test files, different subsystems, different issues), one-at-a-time wastes time. Each is independent and can run in parallel.
Core principle: one agent per independent problem domain, working at once.
When to use
- 3+ test files failing with different root causes.
- Multiple subsystems broken independently.
- A batch of independent issues to fix.
- Each problem stands alone, no shared state.
Don't when failures are related (fixing one may fix others — investigate together), you need full system context, you don't yet know what's broken, or agents would touch the same files (they'd conflict).
The pattern
1. Identify independent domains — group by what's broken:
File A → tool approval flow File B → batch completion File C → abort2. One focused brief per agent — each gets: scope (one file/subsystem), goal, constraints (what NOT to touch), output (what to return).
3. Dispatch in parallel — issue all the agent calls in one message so they
run concurrently. Multiple Agent calls in a turn, or a Workflow
(parallel(...)) when you want clean result collection and a barrier.
4. Review and integrate — read each summary, check for conflicts (same code
edited twice?), run the full suite (pnpm test / cargo test), spot-check —
agents can make systematic errors.
A good brief
Focused, self-contained, specific about output:
Fix the 3 failing tests in src/agents/agent-tool-abort.test.ts:
1. "aborts tool with partial output" — expects 'interrupted at' in the message
2. "handles mixed completed/aborted tools" — fast tool aborted, not completed
3. "tracks pendingToolCount" — expects 3 results, gets 0
Looks like timing/race issues. Read the file, find the real root cause, fix by
replacing arbitrary timeouts with event-based waiting (don't just bump timeouts).
Don't change production code outside the abort path.
Return: root cause + what you changed.Common mistakes
| ❌ | ✅ |
| "Fix all the tests" | "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts" |
| "Fix the race condition" — where? | Paste the errors + test names |
| No constraints → refactors everything | "Don't touch production code" |
| "Fix it" — you don't know what changed | "Return root cause + changes" |
Note on your usual loop
For a batch of GitHub issues, parallel dispatch works when the issues are truly independent — one agent per issue, each on its own branch, then PR each. If two issues touch the same files, do them sequentially (subagent-driven-development) to avoid merge conflicts.
After they return
Read each summary · check for conflicts · run the full suite · spot-check.
Related
- subagent-driven-development — sequential, one-agent-per-task, for tasks that share a codebase.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

