agentleFS
hdprajwalhdprajwal/agent-skills/skills/api-design/SKILL.md

api-design

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design stable, well-shaped interfaces before implementing them — HTTP/REST endpoints, MCP tools, or library/module APIs. Use when adding a public endpoint, defining a contract between modules, designing MCP tools, or shaping a library's surface. Focuses on naming, contracts, error shapes, versioning, and backward compatibility — the parts that are expensive to change later.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use db-design, everything-claude-code and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • yuexueyuSkill

    db-design

    数据库工程师技能 - Schema设计、索引优化、并发安全、数据库审计。当你涉及数据库表/字段/索引/SQL/迁移/MCP数据库操作、建表改表、写查询时必须使用此技能。即使用户只是说"加个字段"或"查下数据",也应触发。

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • InfopibeSkill

    everything-claude-code

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • mryeastcodeSkill

    everything-claude-code-conventions

    Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • tpavanipradeepSkill

    nextjs-turbopack

    Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • Indium-AI-LabsSkill

    data-pipeline-design

    Design batch or incremental ETL and ELT pipelines and warehouse models: grain, partitioning, idempotent loads, late-arriving data, data quality tests, PII controls, and cost monitoring, before building them. Use when adding or changing a dbt model, warehouse table, scheduled transformation, or ingestion job. Not for transactional schema design (use the database-design skill) or event-sourced stores (use the event-sourcing-architecture skill).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • thejordanleopoldSkill

    third-party-integration

    Use when integrating with external APIs, payment processors (Stripe), webhooks, or third-party services. Use when implementing API clients with authentication and rate limiting, handling webhooks with signature verification and idempotency, writing contract tests for external services, or isolating third-party dependencies behind adapters. Triggers: \"Stripe\", \"payment integration\", \"webhook\", \"third-party API\", \"external service\", \"API client\", \"integrate with\", \"signature verification\", \"idempotency key\".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before code, specify for each operation: inputs (types, required vs optional, defaults, validation), outputs (shape, success), errors (what …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat the response shape as a promise — clients depend on fields you think are internal.

    line 54

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

API Design

The contract is the expensive part — implementations change cheaply, public surfaces don't. Design the interface first, write it down, then build to it.

Design the contract first

Before code, specify for each operation: inputs (types, required vs optional, defaults, validation), outputs (shape, success), errors (what can fail and how it's reported), and side effects. Make it explicit — types, a schema, an OpenAPI snippet, or a typed signature — so callers can build against it before the implementation exists (contract-first lets front/back or client/server proceed in parallel).

Naming & consistency

  • One vocabulary across the whole surface. Same concept → same word everywhere.
  • Action-oriented and predictable. REST: nouns + HTTP verbs (GET /users/{id}, POST /users). MCP tools: prefixed verbs (github_create_issue). Library: verbs that match the language's conventions.
  • Symmetry: if there's a create, the get/list/update/delete should look like siblings, not strangers.

Error shapes

  • Consistent, machine-readable: a stable code + a human message + (where useful) which field and how to fix it. Don't leak stack traces.
  • HTTP: correct status codes (4xx caller's fault, 5xx yours) + a structured body.
  • MCP/library: typed errors that tell the caller how to recover.
  • Decide and document what happens on partial failure.

Shape for real use

  • Pagination/limits on anything list-like — never let one call return unbounded data.
  • Idempotency for writes that may be retried (idempotency keys, or PUT semantics).
  • Least surface that works — fewer, composable operations beat dozens of one-off endpoints. You can add later; you can't quietly remove.
  • Sensible defaults so the common call is short; options for the rest.

Versioning & compatibility

  • Additive changes (new optional field, new endpoint) are safe. Removing or renaming a field, tightening validation, or changing a type is breaking.
  • Version when you must break (/v2, or a version field). Deprecate with a migration path and a timeline, don't yank.
  • Treat the response shape as a promise — clients depend on fields you think are internal.

Review checklist

  • Contract written down before implementation
  • Naming consistent and predictable across the surface
  • Errors structured, coded, recoverable
  • Lists paginated/bounded; writes idempotent where retried
  • Defaults make the common case easy
  • Changes classified additive vs breaking; breaking → versioned + migration
  • Documented with at least one example request/response per operation

For MCP tool surfaces specifically, pair with the mcp-builder skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.