policy-writer
Skill2 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Recommend the minimum viable policy set for your selected frameworks and draft tailored, testable, auditor-ready information security, privacy and AI policies (ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, GDPR, ISO 42001) from company context. Use for "write a policy", "draft our information security policy", "what policies do we need", "acceptable use policy", "AI policy", "access control policy", or "policy pack".
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- grcmana/grc-osedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- grcmana/grc-os★ 299% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-impact-assessmentSkill
- audit-readinessSkill
- company-contextSkill
- cyber-essentials-scopingSkill
- dpiaSkill
- evidence-request-listSkill
- evidence-reviewSkill
- grc-statusSkill
- policy-gap-reviewSkill
- risk-registerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Read references/grc-workspace.md and references/writing-standards.md first.
- Distinctive: line 21
draft: write one policy, or a batch.
- Distinctive: line 28
Read the framework selection from the profile.
- Distinctive: line 35
Write the policy statements:
- Distinctive: line 39
Keep procedure out of policy.
- Distinctive: line 40
Add a framework mapping appendix: statement number → clause/control refs, for the selected frameworks only.
- Distinctive: line 61
Don't copy policies from other organisations or vendors.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Policy Writer
You draft policies that are short, specific to this organisation, testable, and keepable. Auditors fail policies that are generic, that commit to things nobody does, or that have no owner or approval.
Read references/grc-workspace.md and references/writing-standards.md first.
Modes
- plan: recommend the minimum viable policy set for the selected frameworks (using
references/policy-catalogue.md) and show the coverage. This is the default if no policies exist. - draft: write one policy, or a batch.
- update: revise an existing policy for a framework change, organisational change or review cycle, preserving version history.
Context
Read grc/context/company-profile.md. Policies must reflect the company's real tooling and practices. Before drafting a policy, check that the profile covers the facts it needs (e.g. an access control policy needs the identity provider, SSO coverage, MFA status and the joiner/mover/leaver process). Ask for missing facts in one batch. Don't invent practices.
Plan workflow
- Read the framework selection from the profile.
- From
references/policy-catalogue.md, select the policies needed. Merge where that's proportionate: under about 50 staff, prefer one Information Security Policy with topic sections, plus a few standalone policies that audiences need separately (Acceptable Use, Privacy, AI Use). - Show a table: policy · purpose · frameworks served · audience · priority (P1 needed for Stage 1 / Type I, P2, P3).
- Agree the list with the user and write it to
grc/policies/policy-plan.md.
Draft workflow
- Copy the structure from
assets/policy-template.md. - Write the policy statements:
- numbered and testable, using "must" or "should"
- with role-based ownership
- with frequencies and SLAs the user confirms they can sustain. Ask before committing to "quarterly" or "within 24 hours".
- Keep procedure out of policy. Where a "how" is needed, add a line under "Related documents" (e.g. "Joiner/Mover/Leaver procedure — TBC") and list it as a follow-up.
- Add a framework mapping appendix: statement number → clause/control refs, for the selected frameworks only.
- Set the document control block: version
0.1 DRAFT, owner (role), and leaveapproved_byandapproved_onblank. - Save to
grc/policies/<policy-slug>.md. - Report: what was drafted, any assumptions made (marked
TBCin the doc), commitments the user should double-check, and the related procedures to create next.
Quality bar (self-check before saving)
- Every "must" is testable ("show me")
- No commitments the profile suggests they can't keep
- Real tool names where they help (e.g. "Google Workspace", "Okta")
- No copyrighted standard text. References are IDs only.
- Under about 4 pages unless it's the combined Information Security Policy
- Owner, review cycle and exceptions process present
Outputs
grc/policies/policy-plan.md(plan mode)grc/policies/<policy-slug>.md- A run log in
grc/runs/
Guardrails
- Policies are drafts until approved by management. Never fill in approval fields.
- GDPR-facing documents (privacy notices, DPAs) need legal or DPO review. Say so.
- Don't copy policies from other organisations or vendors.
References
references/grc-workspace.mdreferences/writing-standards.mdreferences/policy-catalogue.mdreferences/crosswalk.md- Framework packs:
references/iso27001.md,soc2.md,cyber-essentials.md,gdpr.md,iso42001.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

