good-readme
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Creates or improves a repository's main README as the shortest page that tells a visitor what the project is and gets them to a first working result. Use when preparing a repository for visitors or trimming a bloated README, not for a documentation-wide audit or a profile README.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- evilmartians/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- adewale/good-readmetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- evilmartians/agent-skills★ 60same name
- adewale/good-readme★ 12same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- changelogSkill
- cve-patchSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- docs-driftSkill
- improve-designSkill
- improve-seoSkill
- janitorSkill
- kickoffSkill
- nta-scanSkill
- refactor-oopSkill
- repo-reconSkill
- software-architectureSkill
- spec-driven-devSkill
- stack-adviseSkill
- your-skill-nameSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 41
Never expose credentials found in remotes or config.
- Distinctive: line 47
Write the opening: one H1 and a one-to-three-sentence factual pitch.
- Distinctive: line 50
Write getting started: only the steps a new user must perform, in order, as copyable fenced commands without prompts, using the real …
- Distinctive: line 54
Add one usage example of the main task, unless getting started already shows it.
- Distinctive: line 76
Do not grow an existing README by default.
- Distinctive: line 78
Keep the project's language and tone.
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not guess commands, versions, URLs, features, license terms, or contacts.
- Distinctive: line 81
Use sample config, never secret-bearing files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Good README
Goal
The shortest README that lets a first-time visitor understand the project and reach a first working result. The default shape is:
# name
One or two sentences: what it does and who it is for.
## Install
The fewest commands that reach a working result.
## Usage
One example, only if the install section does not already show one.
License: [MIT](LICENSE)This is a ceiling to grow from only when needed, not a checklist to fill.
Context
Check first:
- The README visitors actually see. On GitHub,
.github/READMEwins over the root, thendocs/. Keep its location and format; create a rootREADME.mdif none exists. - Manifests, lockfiles, entry points, and scripts. These establish what the project does and which commands work; old README claims are not proof.
- Existing license, docs, and community files, to link rather than restate. Never expose credentials found in remotes or config.
Steps
- Establish purpose, audience, and state from the repository. Ask only for facts that block the rewrite.
- Write the opening: one H1 and a one-to-three-sentence factual pitch. Add a features list only when the project does several distinct things the pitch cannot carry. Never write a list that restates the pitch.
- Write getting started: only the steps a new user must perform, in order, as copyable fenced commands without prompts, using the real package manager. Skip what tooling handles and prerequisites every reader has. Show required environment variables with safe values; end with how to tell it worked.
- Add one usage example of the main task, unless getting started already shows it. Capture shown output from a real run, not from the old README.
- Everything else is one line or nothing: license, contributing, security, support, and docs each get a single link to the existing file. A section is only for what a visitor would get wrong without it, such as a documented limitation. Use an existing screenshot or badge only if it informs.
- Cut. Reread as a first-time visitor and delete or link out anything they
would not miss: architecture and internals, directory trees, exhaustive
flag, environment, or config tables (link to
--helpor docs instead), changelog content, repeated facts, a table of contents on a page that does not need scrolling, and boilerplate sections. When the cut content is what the project provides, such as its included items, keep a one-line link. - Validate: check relative links, anchors, image paths, and fences; verify commands against scripts and entry points; run safe examples where feasible.
In plan mode, the plan is the new README in full, plus what was removed or moved and where it went.
Constraints
- Scope is the main README. Do not change code, dependencies, settings, or policy files to make the README's claims true.
- Do not grow an existing README by default. Deleting detail, or moving it to existing docs, counts as an improvement.
- Keep the project's language and tone.
- Do not guess commands, versions, URLs, features, license terms, or contacts. Flag missing licensing or contradictions instead of resolving them.
- Use sample config, never secret-bearing files. Validation is not permission to deploy, publish, or call paid services.
Done when
The README has a pitch and an actionable path to a first result, its commands are backed by repository evidence, and its links resolve. Nothing is left that could be removed without a first-time visitor failing or being misled.
Output
Apply the changes. In the handoff, link the README, list what was removed or moved and where it went, report the validation you did, and list any facts you could not settle.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

