agentleFS
gonun13gonun13/agent-skills/skills/good-readme/SKILL.md

good-readme

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Creates or improves a repository's main README as the shortest page that tells a visitor what the project is and gets them to a first working result. Use when preparing a repository for visitors or trimming a bloated README, not for a documentation-wide audit or a profile README.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never expose credentials found in remotes or config.

    line 41
  2. Distinctive:

    Write the opening: one H1 and a one-to-three-sentence factual pitch.

    line 47
  3. Distinctive:

    Write getting started: only the steps a new user must perform, in order, as copyable fenced commands without prompts, using the real …

    line 50
  4. Distinctive:

    Add one usage example of the main task, unless getting started already shows it.

    line 54
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not grow an existing README by default.

    line 76
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep the project's language and tone.

    line 78
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not guess commands, versions, URLs, features, license terms, or contacts.

    line 79
  8. Distinctive:

    Use sample config, never secret-bearing files.

    line 81

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Good README

Goal

The shortest README that lets a first-time visitor understand the project and reach a first working result. The default shape is:

# name

One or two sentences: what it does and who it is for.

## Install

The fewest commands that reach a working result.

## Usage

One example, only if the install section does not already show one.

License: [MIT](LICENSE)

This is a ceiling to grow from only when needed, not a checklist to fill.

Context

Check first:

  • The README visitors actually see. On GitHub, .github/README wins over the root, then docs/. Keep its location and format; create a root README.md if none exists.
  • Manifests, lockfiles, entry points, and scripts. These establish what the project does and which commands work; old README claims are not proof.
  • Existing license, docs, and community files, to link rather than restate. Never expose credentials found in remotes or config.

Steps

  1. Establish purpose, audience, and state from the repository. Ask only for facts that block the rewrite.
  2. Write the opening: one H1 and a one-to-three-sentence factual pitch. Add a features list only when the project does several distinct things the pitch cannot carry. Never write a list that restates the pitch.
  3. Write getting started: only the steps a new user must perform, in order, as copyable fenced commands without prompts, using the real package manager. Skip what tooling handles and prerequisites every reader has. Show required environment variables with safe values; end with how to tell it worked.
  4. Add one usage example of the main task, unless getting started already shows it. Capture shown output from a real run, not from the old README.
  5. Everything else is one line or nothing: license, contributing, security, support, and docs each get a single link to the existing file. A section is only for what a visitor would get wrong without it, such as a documented limitation. Use an existing screenshot or badge only if it informs.
  6. Cut. Reread as a first-time visitor and delete or link out anything they would not miss: architecture and internals, directory trees, exhaustive flag, environment, or config tables (link to --help or docs instead), changelog content, repeated facts, a table of contents on a page that does not need scrolling, and boilerplate sections. When the cut content is what the project provides, such as its included items, keep a one-line link.
  7. Validate: check relative links, anchors, image paths, and fences; verify commands against scripts and entry points; run safe examples where feasible.

In plan mode, the plan is the new README in full, plus what was removed or moved and where it went.

Constraints

  • Scope is the main README. Do not change code, dependencies, settings, or policy files to make the README's claims true.
  • Do not grow an existing README by default. Deleting detail, or moving it to existing docs, counts as an improvement.
  • Keep the project's language and tone.
  • Do not guess commands, versions, URLs, features, license terms, or contacts. Flag missing licensing or contradictions instead of resolving them.
  • Use sample config, never secret-bearing files. Validation is not permission to deploy, publish, or call paid services.

Done when

The README has a pitch and an actionable path to a first result, its commands are backed by repository evidence, and its links resolve. Nothing is left that could be removed without a first-time visitor failing or being misled.

Output

Apply the changes. In the handoff, link the README, list what was removed or moved and where it went, report the validation you did, and list any facts you could not settle.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.