agentleFS
gonun13gonun13/agent-skills/skills/changelog/SKILL.md

changelog

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Supervises a project's changelog and versioning practice, correcting existing entries and instructions before writing a dated release entry and bumping the version field. Use when releasing or when a project has changelog or versioning material to review.

160 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use playtest-report, soak-test and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CoralGameSkill

    playtest-report

    Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    soak-test

    Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    team-live-ops

    Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    team-polish

    Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • +5 more from lilangMax
  • +3 more from CoralGame

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 149 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If there is an ## [Unreleased] section, it is the draft of this entry: check each line against the log, add what is missing, and drop what …

    line 49
  2. Distinctive:

    only Fixed or Security → patch

    line 56
  3. Very specific:

    Write the entry. With an ## [Unreleased] section, rename it to ## [X.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD and add a fresh empty ## [Unreleased] above it.

    line 62
  4. Very specific:

    Update the version field with the project's own tooling where it exists (npm version --no-git-tag-version, poetry version, cargo …

    line 68
  5. Distinctive:

    No file paths, function names, PR numbers, or internal type names.

    line 82
  6. Distinctive:

    Use project vocabulary from the docs, not synonyms.

    line 83
  7. Distinctive:

    Only the changelog, the version field, and instructions that contradict the tooling (step 1) may change.

    line 92
  8. Distinctive:

    No commit, no tag, no push — report the exact commands instead.

    line 96
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not guess the bump when the change type is unclear.

    line 97

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 149 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Changelog

Goal

One new dated release entry covering everything merged since the last release, with the project's version bumped to match, and the existing changelog audited: clear wording problems corrected, factual problems reported.

Context

Check first:

  • CHANGELOG.md (or CHANGES.md / HISTORY.md); if none exists, create one in Keep a Changelog format. Note whether it has an ## [Unreleased] section.
  • The project's version field: package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, VERSION, ... Some projects have none — Go modules, for one — and the version is the git tag alone. Ask if you can find neither.
  • Changelog and versioning instructions, and the project's own names for things: README, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING, docs/, .cursor/rules.
  • The default branch (main or master) and the last release: the latest version tag (git describe --tags --abbrev=0). With no tags, the commit that added the last release heading: git log -S'## [X.Y.Z]' --format=%H -- CHANGELOG.md | tail -1. With neither, ask where the release starts.

Steps

  1. Audit what exists. Check existing entries for factual accuracy against the history, consistent versions and dates, duplicates, the project's terminology, and its documented format. Fix wording only where it is clearly inaccurate, vague, or inconsistent, with the smallest change that keeps its meaning; report anything factually wrong instead of rewriting it. Correct a changelog or versioning instruction only where it contradicts the project's actual tooling or format — a file, command, or section that no longer exists. Gaps and vague instructions are proposals, not edits.
  2. Compare the last release with the version field. If they disagree, explain the mismatch and stop to ask, unless the project clearly marks the field as the unreleased next version.
  3. git log --stat <last-release>..HEAD on the default branch. Open a commit's diff only where its message is vague, or the files it touches suggest more than the message says — messages undersell, so don't trust them alone.
  4. If there is an ## [Unreleased] section, it is the draft of this entry: check each line against the log, add what is missing, and drop what did not happen or has no user-visible effect.
  5. Classify each operator-visible change as Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, or Security. Drop anything with no user-visible effect (refactors, tests, CI, deps, docs-only).
  6. Decide the bump for this run:
    • only Fixed or Security → patch
    • any Added or Deprecated, or a behaviour change an operator would notice → minor
    • anything breaking (Removed, changed defaults, an incompatible format) → never automatic. Flag it and ask. On the operator's say-so, bump major from 1.0.0 up, and minor below it (0.4.2 → 0.5.0).
  7. Write the entry. With an ## [Unreleased] section, rename it to ## [X.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD and add a fresh empty ## [Unreleased] above it; otherwise add the entry at the top. Sections go in the order Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security, omitting empty ones. If the file keeps compare links at the bottom, add the new one and repoint Unreleased.
  8. Update the version field with the project's own tooling where it exists (npm version --no-git-tag-version, poetry version, cargo set-version, ...); otherwise edit the field directly. Where the version is the tag alone, the git tag command in the Output is the bump.
  9. Validate: changelog and version field agree, dates are ISO, and git diff touches only the changelog, the version field, and any instruction corrected in step 1.

In plan mode, stop after step 6. The plan is the new entry verbatim, the old → new version, and each correction to existing entries or instructions.

When writing entries:

  • One line per change, present tense, what an operator can now do or now sees.
  • No file paths, function names, PR numbers, or internal type names.
  • Use project vocabulary from the docs, not synonyms.
  • Security fixes: name the class of issue fixed without a reproduction recipe; never name reporters, internal hosts, customers, or credentials. If the fix is not yet safe to disclose, ask before writing it.
  • Private or internal-only changes (telemetry, infra, secrets rotation) get no entry.

Constraints

  • Only the changelog, the version field, and instructions that contradict the tooling (step 1) may change. No product code or unrelated documentation.
  • Released entries are history: never change their version number, date, heading, or order. Their text changes only as step 1 allows.
  • No commit, no tag, no push — report the exact commands instead.
  • Do not guess the bump when the change type is unclear; ask.

Done when

Existing entries and instructions have been audited, the new entry lists every operator-visible change since the last release, the changelog and version field agree, and the diff contains only the changes the constraints allow.

Output

  • Audit: wording corrected, instructions corrected, and factual problems left for the operator, each with the reason.
  • The new entry verbatim.
  • Old → new version and why that bump.
  • Anything excluded and why.
  • Any suspected breaking change awaiting a decision.
  • Proposals: instruction gaps or policy the project has not settled.
  • Suggested git commit and git tag commands.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.