repo-scan
Skill8 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan skill from a pinned, reviewable commit. Use when repo-scan must be installed before running its cross-stack source-code asset audit; this ECC pointer does not perform the audit itself.
- Deletes or force-pushes
15 other projects use a version of this, 11 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codeedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemonedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- renepf/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use security-review and design-system.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SentrySkillsecurity-review
Finds exploitable application security vulnerabilities in code changes. Use for Warden security scans, appsec review, OWASP-style checks, authentication or authorization bugs, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, secrets, unsafe crypto, webhook verification, open redirects, or sensitive data exposure.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilldesign-system
Audit, document, or extend your design system. Use when checking for naming inconsistencies or hardcoded values across components, writing documentation for a component's variants, states, and accessibility notes, or designing a new pattern that fits the existing system.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 11
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6184% same
- woxiangyangzhimao/skills★ 1474% same
- jdanigo/hydraia★ 884% same
- Rojios/everything-claude-code★ 184% same
- romaintoso78/claude-skills★ 184% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 184% same
- TironFox/everything-claude-code★ 184% same
- Aytsuu/codemini★ 084% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 084% same
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemon★ 082% same
1 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skills★ 79same name
- haibindev/repo-scan★ 22same name
- precise-alloy/ritus★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository273 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-architecture-auditSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- agent-harness-constructionSkill
- agentic-engineeringSkill
- agentic-osSkill
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-payment-x402Skill
- agent-self-evaluationSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- ai-first-engineeringSkill
- ai-regression-testingSkill
- android-clean-architectureSkill
- angular-developerSkill
- api-connector-builderSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- article-writingSkill
- automation-audit-opsSkill
- autonomous-agent-harnessSkill
- autonomous-loopsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- benchmark-methodologySkill
- benchmark-optimization-loopSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- blender-motion-state-inspectionSkill
- blueprintSkill
- brand-discoverySkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- browser-qaSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- canary-watchSkill
- carrier-relationship-managementSkill
- cisco-ios-patternsSkill
- ckSkill
- claude-devfleetSkill
- clickhouse-ioSkill
- click-path-auditSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- codehealth-mcpSkill
- code-tourSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- competitive-platform-analysisSkill
- competitive-report-structureSkill
- compose-multiplatform-patternsSkill
- config-gcSkill
- configure-eccSkill
- connections-optimizerSkill
- content-engineSkill
- content-hash-cache-patternSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- continuous-agent-loopSkill
- contract-firstSkill
- cost-aware-llm-pipelineSkill
- cost-trackingSkill
- council-multi-modelSkill
- councilSkill
- cpp-coding-standardsSkill
- cpp-testingSkill
- crosspostSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 2 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 15
Before major refactoring — identify what's core, what's duplicate, what's dead
- Common: line 150
Highlight structural risks: call out dead-weight artifacts, duplicated wrappers, outdated vendored code, and modules that should be …
- Very specific: line 163
Start with standard depth for first-time audits
- Very specific: line 164
Use fast for monorepos with 100+ modules to get a quick inventory
- Very specific: line 165
Run deep incrementally on modules flagged for refactoring
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
repo-scan
Every ecosystem has its own dependency manager, but no tool looks across C++, Android, iOS, and Web to tell you: how much code is actually yours, what's third-party, and what's dead weight.
When to Use
- Taking over a large legacy codebase and need a structural overview
- Before major refactoring — identify what's core, what's duplicate, what's dead
- Auditing third-party dependencies embedded directly in source (not declared in package managers)
- Preparing architecture decision records for monorepo reorganization
Installation
# Clone first so the pinned commit can be reviewed before installation
set -euo pipefail
REPO_SCAN_COMMIT=2742664ebcad1450c208eda0ae45d3c17fad5dd8
REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR="${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/skills/repo-scan"
REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT="$(dirname "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR")"
mkdir -p "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT"
REPO_SCAN_TMP="$(mktemp -d "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT/.repo-scan-install.XXXXXX")"
REPO_SCAN_TOKEN="${REPO_SCAN_TMP##*.}"
REPO_SCAN_STAGE="$REPO_SCAN_TMP/stage-$REPO_SCAN_TOKEN"
REPO_SCAN_BACKUP="$REPO_SCAN_TMP/backup-$REPO_SCAN_TOKEN"
REPO_SCAN_LOCK="$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT/.repo-scan-install.lock"
REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=0
REPO_SCAN_LOCK_HELD=0
REPO_SCAN_MV_HAS_NO_TARGET=0
cleanup_repo_scan_install() {
if [ "$REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP" -eq 0 ]; then
rm -rf -- "$REPO_SCAN_TMP"
fi
if [ "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK_HELD" -eq 1 ] && ! rmdir -- "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK"; then
printf 'Could not release installation lock at %s\n' "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK" >&2
fi
}
trap cleanup_repo_scan_install EXIT
mkdir "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-source"
if mv -T -- "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-source" \
"$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-destination" 2>/dev/null; then
REPO_SCAN_MV_HAS_NO_TARGET=1
rmdir "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-destination"
else
rmdir "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-source"
fi
move_repo_scan_dir() {
REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE=$1
REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION=$2
REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME=${REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE##*/}
if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION" ]; then
return 1
fi
if [ "$REPO_SCAN_MV_HAS_NO_TARGET" -eq 1 ]; then
mv -T -- "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE" "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION"
return
fi
if ! mv -- "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE" "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION"; then
return 1
fi
if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" ] || \
[ -L "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" ]; then
if ! mv -- "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" \
"$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE"; then
REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=1
printf 'Move conflict recovery failed; staged data remains at %s\n' \
"$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" >&2
fi
return 1
fi
}
git clone --filter=blob:none --no-checkout \
https://github.com/haibindev/repo-scan.git "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source"
git -C "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source" checkout --detach "$REPO_SCAN_COMMIT"
mkdir -p "$REPO_SCAN_STAGE"
git -C "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source" archive "$REPO_SCAN_COMMIT" | \
tar -xf - -C "$REPO_SCAN_STAGE"
# Review "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source" before approving installation.
printf 'Type install to replace %s after reviewing the pinned source: ' \
"$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" >&2
read -r REPO_SCAN_CONFIRM
if [ "$REPO_SCAN_CONFIRM" != install ]; then
printf 'Installation cancelled.\n' >&2
exit 1
fi
if ! mkdir -- "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK" 2>/dev/null; then
printf 'Another repo-scan installation holds the lock at %s\n' \
"$REPO_SCAN_LOCK" >&2
exit 1
fi
REPO_SCAN_LOCK_HELD=1
if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ]; then
move_repo_scan_dir "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP"
fi
if ! move_repo_scan_dir "$REPO_SCAN_STAGE" "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR"; then
if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" ]; then
if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ]; then
REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=1
printf 'Replacement failed and target was recreated; previous installation preserved at %s\n' \
"$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" >&2
elif ! move_repo_scan_dir "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR"; then
REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=1
printf 'Replacement and rollback failed; previous installation preserved at %s\n' \
"$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" >&2
fi
fi
exit 1
fiReview the source before installing any agent skill.
Installation completes only the bootstrap. Reload your agent harness, then invoke repo-scan again. This ECC pointer installs the external skill but does not run a scan itself.
Core Capabilities
| Capability | Description |
| Cross-stack scanning | C/C++, Java/Android, iOS (OC/Swift), Web (TS/JS/Vue) in one pass |
| File classification | Every file tagged as project code, third-party, or build artifact |
| Library detection | 50+ known libraries (FFmpeg, Boost, OpenSSL…) with version extraction |
| Four-level verdicts | Core Asset / Extract & Merge / Rebuild / Deprecate |
| HTML reports | Interactive dark-theme pages with drill-down navigation |
| Monorepo support | Hierarchical scanning with summary + sub-project reports |
Analysis Depth Levels
| Level | Files Read | Use Case |
fast | 1-2 per module | Quick inventory of huge directories |
standard | 2-5 per module | Default audit with full dependency + architecture checks |
deep | 5-10 per module | Adds thread safety, memory management, API consistency |
full | All files | Pre-merge comprehensive review |
How It Works
- Classify the repo surface: enumerate files, then tag each as project code, embedded third-party code, or build artifact.
- Detect embedded libraries: inspect directory names, headers, license files, and version markers to identify bundled dependencies and likely versions.
- Score each module: group files by module or subsystem, then assign one of the four verdicts based on ownership, duplication, and maintenance cost.
- Highlight structural risks: call out dead-weight artifacts, duplicated wrappers, outdated vendored code, and modules that should be extracted, rebuilt, or deprecated.
- Produce the report: return a concise summary plus the interactive HTML output with per-module drill-down so the audit can be reviewed asynchronously.
Examples
On a 50,000-file C++ monorepo:
- Found FFmpeg 2.x (2015 vintage) still in production
- Discovered the same SDK wrapper duplicated 3 times
- Identified 636 MB of committed Debug/ipch/obj build artifacts
- Classified: 3 MB project code vs 596 MB third-party
Best Practices
- Start with
standarddepth for first-time audits - Use
fastfor monorepos with 100+ modules to get a quick inventory - Run
deepincrementally on modules flagged for refactoring - Review the cross-module analysis for duplicate detection across sub-projects
Links
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

