repo-scan
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cross-stack source code asset audit — classifies every file, detects embedded third-party libraries, and delivers actionable four-level verdicts per module with interactive HTML reports.
15 other projects use a version of this, 11 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemonedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- renepf/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- gongyijie85/dsh-eccedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- TironFox/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
Edited · 11
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6198% same
- woxiangyangzhimao/skills★ 1487% same
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 842% same
- jdanigo/hydraia★ 899% same
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 142% same
- romaintoso78/claude-skills★ 199% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1100% same
- Aytsuu/codemini★ 099% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemon★ 098% same
1 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skills★ 79same name
- haibindev/repo-scan★ 22same name
- precise-alloy/ritus★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository269 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- examples/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/common-agents.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-development-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-git-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-performance.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-testing.mdCursor rule
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- api-designSkill
- article-writingSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- content-engineSkill
- crosspostSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dmux-workflowsSkill
- documentation-lookupSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- everything-claude-code-conventionsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 2 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 14
Before major refactoring — identify what's core, what's duplicate, what's dead
- Common: line 58
Highlight structural risks: call out dead-weight artifacts, duplicated wrappers, outdated vendored code, and modules that should be …
- Very specific: line 71
Start with standard depth for first-time audits
- Very specific: line 72
Use fast for monorepos with 100+ modules to get a quick inventory
- Very specific: line 73
Run deep incrementally on modules flagged for refactoring
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
repo-scan
Every ecosystem has its own dependency manager, but no tool looks across C++, Android, iOS, and Web to tell you: how much code is actually yours, what's third-party, and what's dead weight.
When to Use
- Taking over a large legacy codebase and need a structural overview
- Before major refactoring — identify what's core, what's duplicate, what's dead
- Auditing third-party dependencies embedded directly in source (not declared in package managers)
- Preparing architecture decision records for monorepo reorganization
Installation
# Fetch only the pinned commit for reproducibility
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/repo-scan
git init repo-scan
cd repo-scan
git remote add origin https://github.com/haibindev/repo-scan.git
git fetch --depth 1 origin 2742664
git checkout --detach FETCH_HEAD
cp -r . ~/.claude/skills/repo-scanReview the source before installing any agent skill.
Core Capabilities
| Capability | Description |
| Cross-stack scanning | C/C++, Java/Android, iOS (OC/Swift), Web (TS/JS/Vue) in one pass |
| File classification | Every file tagged as project code, third-party, or build artifact |
| Library detection | 50+ known libraries (FFmpeg, Boost, OpenSSL…) with version extraction |
| Four-level verdicts | Core Asset / Extract & Merge / Rebuild / Deprecate |
| HTML reports | Interactive dark-theme pages with drill-down navigation |
| Monorepo support | Hierarchical scanning with summary + sub-project reports |
Analysis Depth Levels
| Level | Files Read | Use Case |
fast | 1-2 per module | Quick inventory of huge directories |
standard | 2-5 per module | Default audit with full dependency + architecture checks |
deep | 5-10 per module | Adds thread safety, memory management, API consistency |
full | All files | Pre-merge comprehensive review |
How It Works
- Classify the repo surface: enumerate files, then tag each as project code, embedded third-party code, or build artifact.
- Detect embedded libraries: inspect directory names, headers, license files, and version markers to identify bundled dependencies and likely versions.
- Score each module: group files by module or subsystem, then assign one of the four verdicts based on ownership, duplication, and maintenance cost.
- Highlight structural risks: call out dead-weight artifacts, duplicated wrappers, outdated vendored code, and modules that should be extracted, rebuilt, or deprecated.
- Produce the report: return a concise summary plus the interactive HTML output with per-module drill-down so the audit can be reviewed asynchronously.
Examples
On a 50,000-file C++ monorepo:
- Found FFmpeg 2.x (2015 vintage) still in production
- Discovered the same SDK wrapper duplicated 3 times
- Identified 636 MB of committed Debug/ipch/obj build artifacts
- Classified: 3 MB project code vs 596 MB third-party
Best Practices
- Start with
standarddepth for first-time audits - Use
fastfor monorepos with 100+ modules to get a quick inventory - Run
deepincrementally on modules flagged for refactoring - Review the cross-module analysis for duplicate detection across sub-projects
Links
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

