api-connector-builder
Skill8 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build a new API connector or provider by matching the target repo's existing integration pattern exactly. Use when adding one more integration without inventing a second architecture.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
6
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 11
Use this when the job is to add a repo-native integration surface, not just a generic HTTP client.
- Common: line 31
do not invent a new integration architecture when the repo already has one
- Common: line 32
do not start from vendor docs alone.
- Common: line 33
do not stop at transport code if the repo expects registry wiring, tests, and docs
- Common: line 34
do not cargo-cult old connectors if the repo has a newer current pattern
- Common: line 47
test fixtures and naming
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
API Connector Builder
Use this when the job is to add a repo-native integration surface, not just a generic HTTP client.
The point is to match the host repository's pattern:
- connector layout
- config schema
- auth model
- error handling
- test style
- registration/discovery wiring
When to Use
- "Build a Jira connector for this project"
- "Add a Slack provider following the existing pattern"
- "Create a new integration for this API"
- "Build a plugin that matches the repo's connector style"
Guardrails
- do not invent a new integration architecture when the repo already has one
- do not start from vendor docs alone; start from existing in-repo connectors first
- do not stop at transport code if the repo expects registry wiring, tests, and docs
- do not cargo-cult old connectors if the repo has a newer current pattern
Workflow
1. Learn the house style
Inspect at least 2 existing connectors/providers and map:
- file layout
- abstraction boundaries
- config model
- retry / pagination conventions
- registry hooks
- test fixtures and naming
2. Narrow the target integration
Define only the surface the repo actually needs:
- auth flow
- key entities
- core read/write operations
- pagination and rate limits
- webhook or polling model
3. Build in repo-native layers
Typical slices:
- config/schema
- client/transport
- mapping layer
- connector/provider entrypoint
- registration
- tests
4. Validate against the source pattern
The new connector should look obvious in the codebase, not imported from a different ecosystem.
Reference Shapes
Provider-style
providers/
existing_provider/
__init__.py
provider.py
config.pyConnector-style
integrations/
existing/
client.py
models.py
connector.pyTypeScript plugin-style
src/integrations/
existing/
index.ts
client.ts
types.ts
test.tsQuality Checklist
- matches an existing in-repo integration pattern
- config validation exists
- auth and error handling are explicit
- pagination/retry behavior follows repo norms
- registry/discovery wiring is complete
- tests mirror the host repo's style
- docs/examples are updated if expected by the repo
Related Skills
backend-patternsmcp-server-patternsgithub-ops
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6196% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 197% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 097% same
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemon★ 094% same
- renepf/claude-skills★ 097% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository273 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-architecture-auditSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- agent-harness-constructionSkill
- agentic-engineeringSkill
- agentic-osSkill
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-payment-x402Skill
- agent-self-evaluationSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- ai-first-engineeringSkill
- ai-regression-testingSkill
- android-clean-architectureSkill
- angular-developerSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- article-writingSkill
- automation-audit-opsSkill
- autonomous-agent-harnessSkill
- autonomous-loopsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- benchmark-methodologySkill
- benchmark-optimization-loopSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- blender-motion-state-inspectionSkill
- blueprintSkill
- brand-discoverySkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- browser-qaSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- canary-watchSkill
- carrier-relationship-managementSkill
- cisco-ios-patternsSkill
- ckSkill
- claude-devfleetSkill
- clickhouse-ioSkill
- click-path-auditSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- codehealth-mcpSkill
- code-tourSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- competitive-platform-analysisSkill
- competitive-report-structureSkill
- compose-multiplatform-patternsSkill
- config-gcSkill
- configure-eccSkill
- connections-optimizerSkill
- content-engineSkill
- content-hash-cache-patternSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- continuous-agent-loopSkill
- contract-firstSkill
- cost-aware-llm-pipelineSkill
- cost-trackingSkill
- council-multi-modelSkill
- councilSkill
- cpp-coding-standardsSkill
- cpp-testingSkill
- crosspostSkill
- csharp-testingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

