ds-test-mode
Skill20 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Activate pragmatic testing mode for this session.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- ds-dev-skill-benchSkill
- ds-agent-reviewSkill
- ds-architecture-planSkill
- ds-arenaSkill
- ds-blast-radiusSkill
- ds-blueprintSkill
- ds-bug-reviewSkill
- ds-clarity-reviewSkill
- ds-code-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-comment-reviewSkill
- ds-data-modeSkill
- ds-data-reviewSkill
- ds-debugSkill
- ds-deslopSkill
- ds-doc-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-exploreSkill
- ds-git-modeSkill
- ds-go-reviewSkill
- ds-grill-meSkill
- ds-handoffSkill
- ds-howSkill
- ds-humanizeSkill
- ds-interaction-modeSkill
- ds-java-reviewSkill
- ds-notebook-reviewSkill
- ds-onboardingSkill
- ds-osvSkill
- ds-perf-planSkill
- ds-project-checkpointSkill
- ds-project-resumeSkill
- ds-python-reviewSkill
- ds-quality-gateSkill
- ds-reflectSkill
- ds-retroSkill
- ds-roadmapSkill
- ds-rust-reviewSkill
- ds-security-reviewSkill
- ds-semgrepSkill
- ds-shell-reviewSkill
- dsSkill
- ds-specSkill
- ds-step-modeSkill
- ds-tdd-modeSkill
- ds-test-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-tiger-style-modeSkill
- ds-tldtSkill
- ds-ts-reviewSkill
- ds-ui-modeSkill
- ds-ui-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-verify-thisSkill
- ds-zig-reviewSkill
- ds-zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Test by risk, not by rule.
- Distinctive: line 15
Every bug you fix: a test that reproduces it first, so it can't come back.
- Distinctive: line 34
Prefer fewer, sharper tests that would each catch a real failure over many that chase coverage.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When active, make sure the things that matter get well tested as you build — without test-first ceremony. This is the pragmatic sibling of /ds-tdd-mode: /ds-tdd-mode drives the design by writing the test first; this rides alongside normal work and ensures the risk is covered before you call something done. To audit tests that already exist, use /ds-test-quality-review.
What earns a test
Test by risk, not by rule. Spend tests where a failure would actually hurt:
- Core domain logic, money/auth/permissions, data integrity, parsing, state machines — anything with real branching.
- The edge cases bugs hide in: boundaries (empty, zero, one, max, off-by-one), invalid input, error paths, partial failure, concurrency and ordering.
- Every bug you fix: a test that reproduces it first, so it can't come back.
Skip the trivia — getters, glue code, framework behavior, the obvious. A test there is maintenance with no payoff.
What a good test looks like
- Exercises real behavior through the public interface — not internals.
- Survives a behavior-preserving refactor unchanged. If it breaks when nothing observable changed, it was testing the wrong thing.
- One logical assertion; a name that states the behavior; deterministic (no wall-clock, network, or test-order dependence).
- Checks its result against an independent expected value — a known-good literal, a worked example, the spec — not a value recomputed the way the code does (a test that mirrors the code can't fail).
Don't lock the design
A test coupled to implementation is a liability, not an asset — it taxes every change and trains the team to ignore red. As you write tests, avoid:
- Mocking internal collaborators; asserting on call counts or call order.
- Testing private methods, or reaching through a side channel instead of the interface.
- Snapshotting everything as a substitute for asserting what actually matters.
Prefer fewer, sharper tests that would each catch a real failure over many that chase coverage. Coverage is a side effect of testing the right things, never the goal.
Confirm activation with "Pragmatic testing mode active." Activating a mode only turns on this posture; it is not approval to begin work — continue with whatever the user already asked for, or wait for their next instruction.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

