ds-retro
Skill20 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Post-release retrospective — compare what SPEC.md/GRILL.md decided against what the release range actually shipped.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- ds-dev-skill-benchSkill
- ds-agent-reviewSkill
- ds-architecture-planSkill
- ds-arenaSkill
- ds-blast-radiusSkill
- ds-blueprintSkill
- ds-bug-reviewSkill
- ds-clarity-reviewSkill
- ds-code-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-comment-reviewSkill
- ds-data-modeSkill
- ds-data-reviewSkill
- ds-debugSkill
- ds-deslopSkill
- ds-doc-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-exploreSkill
- ds-git-modeSkill
- ds-go-reviewSkill
- ds-grill-meSkill
- ds-handoffSkill
- ds-howSkill
- ds-humanizeSkill
- ds-interaction-modeSkill
- ds-java-reviewSkill
- ds-notebook-reviewSkill
- ds-onboardingSkill
- ds-osvSkill
- ds-perf-planSkill
- ds-project-checkpointSkill
- ds-project-resumeSkill
- ds-python-reviewSkill
- ds-quality-gateSkill
- ds-reflectSkill
- ds-roadmapSkill
- ds-rust-reviewSkill
- ds-security-reviewSkill
- ds-semgrepSkill
- ds-shell-reviewSkill
- dsSkill
- ds-specSkill
- ds-step-modeSkill
- ds-tdd-modeSkill
- ds-test-modeSkill
- ds-test-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-tiger-style-modeSkill
- ds-tldtSkill
- ds-ts-reviewSkill
- ds-ui-modeSkill
- ds-ui-quality-reviewSkill
- ds-verify-thisSkill
- ds-zig-reviewSkill
- ds-zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 7
When invoked, run a post-release retrospective over a release range: compare what was decided (SPEC.md, GRILL.md) against what shipped, and …
- Distinctive: line 17
no tags: on a non-default branch, offer merge-base-with-default-branch..HEAD (a branch retro).
- Distinctive: line 22
Read whatever exists; open the report with a source inventory naming what was found and what analysis its absence disables ("GRILL.md ✓ · …
- Very specific: line 25
Pinned reads: read SPEC.md/GRILL.md at the range end — git --no-pager show vNEXT:SPEC.md — never the working tree.
- Very specific: line 33
Check each commit is a dedicated docs(spec): / docs(grill): commit and the commit count squares with the amendment lines found in the files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When invoked, run a post-release retrospective over a release range: compare what was decided (SPEC.md, GRILL.md) against what shipped, and distill rules for the next cycle. The loop-closer to /ds-spec and /ds-grill-me — they record decisions going in; this judges them coming out.
Arguments
- A release range, resolved in order:
vPREV..vNEXT— used verbatim; any valid git range works, branches and SHAs included (v0.4.0..HEADfor a retro before tagging).- a single ref — the range is previous-version-tag..ref.
- nothing — inspect the repo and offer a range; never silently pick one:
- HEAD ahead of the newest version tag (
git --no-pager tag --sort=-v:refname) → offer newest-tag..HEAD — the unreleased work, the pre-merge case — with the last two tags as the named alternative. - HEAD at the newest tag → the last two version tags.
- no tags: on a non-default branch, offer merge-base-with-default-branch..HEAD (a branch retro); on the default branch, ask for an explicit range. Never guess.
- HEAD ahead of the newest version tag (
--record [path]— also write the retro toRETRO.mdin the current directory, or topath. Without the flag, the retro lives in the session only.
Sources
Read whatever exists; open the report with a source inventory naming what was found and what analysis its absence disables ("GRILL.md ✓ · SPEC.md ✗ — spec-break analysis skipped").
- Floor: at least one of
SPEC.md/GRILL.md. Neither → stop and point at/ds-specand/ds-grill-me; with no recorded decisions there is nothing to compare, and the output would be a changelog, not a retro. - Pinned reads: read
SPEC.md/GRILL.mdat the range end —git --no-pager show vNEXT:SPEC.md— never the working tree; the next cycle may already be amending them. Mid-implementation amendments are the in-file datedAmended YYYY-MM-DD:lines whose dates fall inside the range (tag dates come fromgit --no-pager log --no-color -1 --format=%ci <tag>). - Enrichment:
.project/roadmap.mdand.project/state.md(# settled/# hazards) from the working tree — git-ignored, so the working copy is the only copy. Flag them in the report as "current lens, not range-pinned."
Discipline audit
The amendment discipline (scaffolded by devskills init --spec-discipline) makes the decision files self-describing; git's job is to verify the files, not to be the source:
git --no-pager log --no-color --format='%h %s' vPREV..vNEXT -- SPEC.md GRILL.md.- Check each commit is a dedicated
docs(spec):/docs(grill):commit and the commit count squares with the amendment lines found in the files. - A mismatch — spec edits riding feature commits, changes with no
Amended:line — is itself a retro finding: report the drift. Only then read each offending commit withgit --no-pager show --no-ext-diff --no-color --format='%h %s' <sha> -- SPEC.md GRILL.mdto recover what changed.
Report
Compare decided vs happened across:
- Assumptions measurement killed — assumptions the release's reality disproved.
- Decisions that held — calls that survived contact, and why.
- Spec breaks — shipped behavior that contradicts an unamended decision.
- Accepted-consequence accuracy — did the costs knowingly accepted show up as predicted?
- Unvalidated-at-scale leftovers — decisions still untested by real use, carried into the next cycle.
Plus the source inventory and any discipline-drift findings.
RETRO.md (with --record)
- File shape: a
# Retrospectivesheader with one intro line; one section per retro, newest first, inserted directly under the header. - Section shape:
## vPREV..vNEXT — YYYY-MM-DD, distilled rule bullets first, then### Evidencewith condensed support. Rules-first is what lets/ds-grill-meand/ds-specread the top of a section and stop. - Idempotent per range: re-running for a range already present replaces that range's own section; other sections are never touched — git history is RETRO.md's audit trail.
Companion habit
/ds-grill-me and /ds-spec read RETRO.md at invocation (current directory, then repo root) and surface its rules as priors — cited when they bear on the question at hand, overridable by the user, never silently binding.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

