agentleFS
GitHubKnown publishergithub/squad/packages/squad-cli/templates/skills/pr-screenshots/SKILL.md

pr-screenshots

Skill3.4k starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Capture Playwright screenshots and embed them in GitHub PR descriptions

  • Commits and pushes

14 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When a PR includes visual changes (docs sites, UI components, generated pages), reviewers need to see what the PR delivers without checking …

    line 11
  2. Distinctive:

    Use this skill whenever:

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    If Playwright tests already exist and produce screenshots, reuse those.

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Use gh pr edit with the raw URLs embedded as markdown images:

    line 74
  5. Distinctive:

    After the PR is merged, delete the temporary branch:

    line 106
  6. Very specific:

    Start dev server: cd docs && npm run dev

    line 126
  7. Distinctive:

    Run Playwright tests (they capture screenshots as a side effect)

    line 127
  8. Very specific:

    Update PR body with embedded !...

    line 129
  9. Very specific:

    If tests at docs/tests/*.spec.mjs already save to docs/tests/screenshots/:

    line 134

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Context

When a PR includes visual changes (docs sites, UI components, generated pages), reviewers need to see what the PR delivers without checking out the branch. Screenshots belong in the PR description body, not as committed files and not as text descriptions.

Use this skill whenever:

  • A PR touches docs site pages (Astro, Starlight, etc.)
  • A PR adds or changes UI components
  • A PR generates visual artifacts (TypeDoc, Storybook, diagrams)
  • Playwright tests already capture screenshots as part of testing

Patterns

1. Capture screenshots with Playwright

If Playwright tests already exist and produce screenshots, reuse those. Otherwise, write a minimal capture script:

// scripts/capture-pr-screenshots.mjs
import { chromium } from 'playwright';

const browser = await chromium.launch();
const page = await browser.newPage({ viewport: { width: 1280, height: 720 } });

const screenshots = [
  { url: 'http://localhost:4321/path/to/page', name: 'feature-landing' },
  { url: 'http://localhost:4321/path/to/detail', name: 'feature-detail' },
];

for (const { url, name } of screenshots) {
  await page.goto(url, { waitUntil: 'networkidle' });
  await page.screenshot({ path: `screenshots/${name}.png`, fullPage: false });
}

await browser.close();

2. Host screenshots on a temporary branch

GitHub PR descriptions render images via URLs. The gh CLI cannot upload binary images directly. Use a temporary orphan branch to host the images:

# Save current branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current

# Create orphan branch with only screenshot files
git checkout --orphan screenshots-temp
git reset
git add screenshots/*.png
git commit -m "screenshots for PR review"
git push origin screenshots-temp --force

# Build raw URLs
$base = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/{owner}/{repo}/screenshots-temp/screenshots"
# Each image: $base/{name}.png

# Return to working branch
git checkout -f $currentBranch

3. Embed in PR description

Use gh pr edit with the raw URLs embedded as markdown images:

$base = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/{owner}/{repo}/screenshots-temp/screenshots"

gh pr edit {PR_NUMBER} --repo {owner}/{repo} --body @"
## {PR Title}

### What this PR delivers
- {bullet points of changes}

---

### Screenshots

#### {Page/Feature Name}
![{alt text}]($base/{name}.png)

#### {Another Page}
![{alt text}]($base/{another-name}.png)

---

### To verify locally
```bash
{commands to run locally}

"@


### 4. Cleanup after merge

After the PR is merged, delete the temporary branch:

```bash
git push origin --delete screenshots-temp

5. Gitignore screenshots locally

Screenshots are build artifacts — never commit them to feature branches:

# PR screenshots (hosted on temp branch, not committed to features)
screenshots/
docs/tests/screenshots/

Examples

Example: Docs site PR with 3 pages

  1. Start dev server: cd docs && npm run dev
  2. Run Playwright tests (they capture screenshots as a side effect)
  3. Push screenshots to screenshots-temp branch
  4. Update PR body with embedded ![...]() image references
  5. Reviewer sees the pages inline without checking out the branch

Example: Reusing existing Playwright test screenshots

If tests at docs/tests/*.spec.mjs already save to docs/tests/screenshots/:

cd docs && npx playwright test tests/api-reference.spec.mjs
# Screenshots now at docs/tests/screenshots/*.png
# Push those to screenshots-temp and embed in PR

Anti-Patterns

  • ❌ Committing screenshots to feature branches — they bloat the repo and go stale
  • ❌ Posting text descriptions instead of actual images — reviewers can't see what they're getting
  • ❌ Using gh CLI to "upload" images — gh issue comment and gh pr edit don't support binary uploads
  • ❌ Asking the user to manually drag-drop images — automate it with the temp branch pattern
  • ❌ Skipping screenshots for visual PRs — if the PR changes what users see, show what users see
  • ❌ Leaving the screenshots-temp branch around forever — clean up after merge

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.