client-compatibility
Skill3.4k starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Platform detection and adaptive spawning for CLI vs VS Code vs other surfaces
3 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demosedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- github/gh-awedited, first seen May 27, 2026
- Azure/apiops-cliedited, first seen Apr 27, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6k98% same
- Azure/apiops-cli★ 3298% same
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demos★ 298% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository247 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- packages/squad-cli/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- packages/squad-sdk/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad-templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- action-skill-contractsSkill
- agent-collaborationSkill
- agent-conductSkill
- architectural-proposalsSkill
- architectural-reviewSkill
- archival-integritySkill
- ci-validation-gatesSkill
- client-compatibilitySkill
- cli-wiringSkill
- content-scopeSkill
- distributed-meshSkill
- documentation-maintenanceSkill
- github-multi-accountSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- history-hygieneSkill
- init-modeSkill
- model-selectionSkill
- pr-lifecycleSkill
- protected-filesSkill
- release-processSkill
- reskillSkill
- reviewer-protocolSkill
- secret-handlingSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- test-disciplineSkill
- windows-compatibilitySkill
- agentic-workflow-designerSkill
- gh-aw-reliabilitySkill
- iterative-retrievalSkill
- reflectSkill
- {skill-name}Skill
- agent-collaborationSkill
- agent-conductSkill
- architectural-proposalsSkill
- ci-validation-gatesSkill
- cli-wiringSkill
- coordinator-init-modeSkill
- coordinator-response-modeSkill
- coordinator-source-of-truthSkill
- cross-machine-coordinationSkill
- cross-squad-communicationSkill
- cross-squadSkill
- distributed-meshSkill
- docs-standardsSkill
- e2e-template-testingSkill
- economy-modeSkill
- error-recoverySkill
- external-commsSkill
- fact-checkingSkill
- gh-auth-isolationSkill
- gh-aw-enlistmentSkill
- github-multi-accountSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 3 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 17
Before spawning agents, determine the platform by checking available tools:
- Very specific: line 25
If both task and runSubagent are available, prefer task (richer parameter surface).
- Common: line 34
When in VS Code mode, the coordinator changes behavior in these ways:
- Very specific: line 36
Spawning tool: Use runSubagent instead of task.
- Common: line 44
Prompt content: Keep ALL prompt structure — charter, identity, task, hygiene, response order blocks are surface-independent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Context
Squad runs on multiple Copilot surfaces (CLI, VS Code, JetBrains, GitHub.com). The coordinator must detect its platform and adapt spawning behavior accordingly. Different tools are available on different platforms, requiring conditional logic for agent spawning, SQL usage, and response timing.
Patterns
Platform Detection
Before spawning agents, determine the platform by checking available tools:
- CLI mode —
tasktool is available → full spawning control. Usetaskwithagent_type,mode,model,description,promptparameters. Collect results viaread_agent. - VS Code mode —
runSubagentoragenttool is available → conditional behavior. UserunSubagentwith the task prompt. Dropagent_type,mode, andmodelparameters. Multiple subagents in one turn run concurrently (equivalent to background mode). Results return automatically — noread_agentneeded. - Fallback mode — neither
tasknorrunSubagent/agentavailable → work inline. Do not apologize or explain the limitation. Execute the task directly.
If both task and runSubagent are available, prefer task (richer parameter surface).
CopilotSession Lifecycle Invariant
- CopilotSession lifecycle management must stay deterministic across surfaces: no ambiguous ownership or state transitions.
- Session resources must be released on completion, cancellation, and error paths; compatibility work must not trade platform coverage for leaks.
VS Code Spawn Adaptations
When in VS Code mode, the coordinator changes behavior in these ways:
- Spawning tool: Use
runSubagentinstead oftask. The prompt is the only required parameter — pass the full agent prompt (charter, identity, task, hygiene, response order) exactly as you would on CLI. - Parallelism: Spawn ALL concurrent agents in a SINGLE turn. They run in parallel automatically. This replaces
mode: "background"+read_agentpolling. - Model selection: Accept the session model. Do NOT attempt per-spawn model selection or fallback chains — they only work on CLI. In Phase 1, all subagents use whatever model the user selected in VS Code's model picker.
- Scribe: Cannot fire-and-forget. Batch Scribe as the LAST subagent in any parallel group. Scribe is light work (file ops only), so the blocking is tolerable.
- Launch table: Skip it. Results arrive with the response, not separately. By the time the coordinator speaks, the work is already done.
read_agent: Skip entirely. Results return automatically when subagents complete.agent_type: Drop it. All VS Code subagents have full tool access by default. Subagents inherit the parent's tools.description: Drop it. The agent name is already in the prompt.- Prompt content: Keep ALL prompt structure — charter, identity, task, hygiene, response order blocks are surface-independent.
Feature Degradation Table
| Feature | CLI | VS Code | Degradation |
| Parallel fan-out | mode: "background" + read_agent | Multiple subagents in one turn | None — equivalent concurrency |
| Model selection | Per-spawn model param (4-layer hierarchy) | Session model only (Phase 1) | Accept session model, log intent |
| Scribe fire-and-forget | Background, never read | Sync, must wait | Batch with last parallel group |
| Launch table UX | Show table → results later | Skip table → results with response | UX only — results are correct |
| SQL tool | Available | Not available | Avoid SQL in cross-platform code paths |
| Response order bug | Critical workaround | Possibly necessary (unverified) | Keep the block — harmless if unnecessary |
SQL Tool Caveat
The sql tool is CLI-only. It does not exist on VS Code, JetBrains, or GitHub.com. Any coordinator logic or agent workflow that depends on SQL (todo tracking, batch processing, session state) will silently fail on non-CLI surfaces. Cross-platform code paths must not depend on SQL. Use filesystem-based state (.squad/ files) for anything that must work everywhere.
Examples
Example 1: CLI parallel spawn
// Coordinator detects task tool available → CLI mode
task({ agent_type: "general-purpose", mode: "background", model: "claude-sonnet-4.5", ... })
task({ agent_type: "general-purpose", mode: "background", model: "claude-haiku-4.5", ... })
// Later: read_agent for bothExample 2: VS Code parallel spawn
// Coordinator detects runSubagent available → VS Code mode
runSubagent({ prompt: "...Runtime Engineer charter + task..." })
runSubagent({ prompt: "...Quality Engineer charter + task..." })
runSubagent({ prompt: "...Scribe charter + task..." }) // Last in group
// Results return automatically, no read_agentExample 3: Fallback mode
// Neither task nor runSubagent available → work inline
// Coordinator executes the task directly without spawningAnti-Patterns
- ❌ Using SQL tool in cross-platform workflows (breaks on VS Code/JetBrains/GitHub.com)
- ❌ Attempting per-spawn model selection on VS Code (Phase 1 — only session model works)
- ❌ Fire-and-forget Scribe on VS Code (must batch as last subagent)
- ❌ Showing launch table on VS Code (results already inline)
- ❌ Apologizing or explaining platform limitations to the user
- ❌ Using
taskwhen onlyrunSubagentis available - ❌ Dropping prompt structure (charter/identity/task) on non-CLI platforms
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

