action-skill-contracts
Skill3.4k starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Author deterministic skills for operations that change state or invoke external tools
In this repository247 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- packages/squad-cli/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- packages/squad-sdk/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad-templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- agent-collaborationSkill
- agent-conductSkill
- architectural-proposalsSkill
- architectural-reviewSkill
- archival-integritySkill
- ci-validation-gatesSkill
- client-compatibilitySkill
- cli-wiringSkill
- content-scopeSkill
- distributed-meshSkill
- documentation-maintenanceSkill
- github-multi-accountSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- history-hygieneSkill
- init-modeSkill
- model-selectionSkill
- pr-lifecycleSkill
- protected-filesSkill
- release-processSkill
- reskillSkill
- reviewer-protocolSkill
- secret-handlingSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- test-disciplineSkill
- windows-compatibilitySkill
- agentic-workflow-designerSkill
- gh-aw-reliabilitySkill
- iterative-retrievalSkill
- reflectSkill
- {skill-name}Skill
- agent-collaborationSkill
- agent-conductSkill
- architectural-proposalsSkill
- ci-validation-gatesSkill
- client-compatibilitySkill
- cli-wiringSkill
- coordinator-init-modeSkill
- coordinator-response-modeSkill
- coordinator-source-of-truthSkill
- cross-machine-coordinationSkill
- cross-squad-communicationSkill
- cross-squadSkill
- distributed-meshSkill
- docs-standardsSkill
- e2e-template-testingSkill
- economy-modeSkill
- error-recoverySkill
- external-commsSkill
- fact-checkingSkill
- gh-auth-isolationSkill
- gh-aw-enlistmentSkill
- github-multi-accountSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Use this skill when authoring or revising a skill that can mutate files, state, repositories, or external systems.
- Very specific: line 16
Start with an explicit ## SCOPE: activation conditions, allowed targets, and exclusions.
- Distinctive: line 23
Keep one skill focused on one operational boundary.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Context
Use this skill when authoring or revising a skill that can mutate files, state, repositories, or external systems. Informational reference skills need not carry operational ceremony.
Patterns
- Start with an explicit
## SCOPE: activation conditions, allowed targets, and exclusions. - Provide an ordered, deterministic workflow. State required inputs, the intended side effect, and the exact validation after each consequential operation.
- Define STOP conditions for missing prerequisites, ambiguous scope, failed verification, and unavailable tools. A failed precondition must not look like success.
- Point to a current canonical implementation or workflow when a procedure depends on repository behavior; do not copy volatile values into prose.
- Keep one skill focused on one operational boundary. Link to related skills rather than combining unrelated governance, release, and documentation procedures.
Examples
archival-integrity defines a verified append-before-trim transaction. gh-aw-enlistment limits
mutations through an explicit allowlist and ends with strict compilation.
Anti-Patterns
- Vague verbs such as “handle,” “ensure,” or “fix” without an observable success condition
- Side effects that proceed after a failed validation
- Treating a dated incident workaround as a permanent procedure without reconciling source
- Adding action ceremony to a purely explanatory skill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

