case-study-writer
Skill0 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Expert skill for writing agency/marketing case studies that convert prospects. Use whenever the user mentions writing a case study, client success story, results writeup, before/after marketing story, PAR format (Problem-Action-Result), case study for pitch deck, vertical case study, or "turn this client result into a case study." Also trigger for "write up what we did for [client]," "document our wins," or preparing case studies for proposals, landing pages, cold outreach, or sales decks. Do NOT use for academic case studies or B2B longform research reports. Covers the PAR framework, vertical-specific templates, metric presentation, visual layout guidance, and how to repurpose one case study across multiple channels.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jqaisystems/jqai-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- prosyo-ai/gtm-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- aditya-ariosity/ux-ui-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 2, 2026
- Gonadotrophic-tangent41/ux-ui-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 9, 2026
- styfinity/claude-marketing-departmenttheir own version, first seen Jul 8, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing★ 15same name
- prosyo-ai/gtm-skill★ 13same name
- styfinity/claude-marketing-department★ 6same name
- jqaisystems/jqai-ai-skills★ 3same name
- aditya-ariosity/ux-ui-skills★ 2same name
- Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-team★ 1same name
- Gonadotrophic-tangent41/ux-ui-skills★ 0same name
- tjrice42/design-judgment-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- agency-positioning-expertSkill
- chief-marketing-officerSkill
- clay-enrichment-architectSkill
- cold-email-outreachSkill
- content-market-intelligenceSkill
- design-qaSkill
- email-marketingSkill
- ghl-snapshot-builderSkill
- go-high-level-expertSkill
- google-ads-expertSkill
- google-tag-manager-expertSkill
- icp-filter-architectSkill
- instagram-content-creatorSkill
- landing-page-designerSkill
- landing-page-visual-standardsSkill
- linkedin-outreach-architectSkill
- linkedin-post-writerSkill
- looker-studio-expertSkill
- meta-ads-expertSkill
- n8n-workflow-expertSkill
- outreach-message-criticSkill
- seo-client-outreachSkill
- youtube-gap-finderSkill
- youtube-video-ideationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Every case study follows this 3-part structure:
- Distinctive: line 180
Ask open-ended questions: "What was the hardest part before we started?"
- Distinctive: line 190
Before/after screenshots (dashboards, landing pages, ads)
- Distinctive: line 257
No timeframe (was that "2x growth" over 10 years or 90 days?)
- Distinctive: line 262
Always get written approval before publishing
- Distinctive: line 264
Don't inflate or manipulate numbers
- Distinctive: line 266
If client asks to remove later, honor it
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Case Study Writer
When to Use This Skill
- Writing a case study from raw client data
- Restructuring an existing case study for better conversion
- Building a case study library for your agency
- Adapting one case study into multiple formats (PDF, landing page, LinkedIn post, cold email snippet)
- Preparing case studies for a specific vertical or offer
The PAR Framework (Core Structure)
Every case study follows this 3-part structure:
P - Problem (The Before State)
- Client's business context (size, vertical, location)
- Specific situation before they hired you
- Metrics showing the pain (low leads, high CPA, declining revenue)
- What they tried that didn't work
- What was at stake if they didn't fix it
A - Action (What You Did)
- Strategy decisions (and why)
- Specific tactics executed
- Timeline of implementation
- Tools/platforms used
- Key insight or differentiator (what others would have missed)
R - Result (The After State)
- Headline metric (the big number)
- Supporting metrics (secondary wins)
- Timeline for results
- Business impact (not just marketing metrics)
- Direct client quote if possible
Case Study Formats
Format 1: Long-form (Website / PDF)
- 800-1,500 words
- Full PAR structure with detailed narrative
- Multiple data visualizations
- Client quote block
- CTA to work with you
Format 2: One-Pager (Sales Deck)
- 150-300 words
- Stripped to headline metric + 3 supporting points
- Logo + industry + timeframe at top
- Single hero number dominant
Format 3: LinkedIn Post / Social
- 200-400 words
- Hook → Problem → Action → Result → Takeaway
- Line breaks for scannability
- Specific numbers in the hook
Format 4: Email/Outreach Snippet
- 50-80 words
- Problem-Result compression, Action implied
- One number, one specific detail
Writing Frameworks By Vertical
Paid Ads Case Study (Google Ads / Meta)
Problem anchors to cover:
- Current CPA vs. target CPA
- Wasted spend (broad match, no negatives, bad structure)
- Conversion tracking gaps
- Audience or creative issues
Action anchors to cover:
- Account restructure decision
- Campaign architecture chosen
- Creative/ad copy approach
- Tracking fixes
- Bidding strategy shift
Result anchors to cover:
- CPA change (%)
- Conversion volume change
- ROAS or CPL
- Monthly revenue impact
Example headline metrics (paid ads):
- "Reduced cost-per-lead from $247 to $89 in 60 days"
- "3.2x increase in qualified consultations for dental practice"
- "Cut wasted ad spend by $8,400/month while doubling leads"
Lead Gen / Funnel Case Study
Problem anchors:
- Low conversion rate on landing page/funnel
- Long sales cycle
- Poor lead quality
Action anchors:
- Funnel redesign approach
- Lead qualification added
- Automation sequences built
- Tech stack changes
Result anchors:
- Conversion rate improvement
- Lead-to-appointment rate
- Time-to-close reduction
- Revenue per lead
Agency/Consulting Case Study
Problem anchors:
- Specific business goal not hit
- Operational bottleneck
- Strategic gap
Action anchors:
- Systems/process built
- Team enablement
- Measurement framework
Result anchors:
- Business outcome (revenue, margin, retention)
- Efficiency gain
- Team/client NPS
Ecommerce Case Study
Problem anchors:
- ROAS below breakeven
- High CAC vs. AOV
- Creative fatigue / scaling wall
Action anchors:
- Account restructure (ASC, creative systems)
- Creative testing framework
- Email/SMS lifecycle built
- Attribution fixes
Result anchors:
- ROAS
- Revenue growth
- LTV/CAC ratio
Metric Presentation Rules
The Headline Number
Your case study lives or dies on one number. Make it:
- Specific: "247%" not "more than 2x"
- Contextual: "in 90 days" or "with the same budget"
- Relevant: The metric the reader actually cares about
Supporting Metrics (3-5 max)
Group by category:
- Traffic/Reach: Impressions, clicks, CTR
- Conversion: CPA, CVR, leads/sales
- Business: Revenue, ROAS, LTV
What to Avoid
- Vanity metrics without business context (impressions alone)
- Percentages without absolute numbers ("500% increase!" from 1 to 5)
- Graphs without axis labels
- Comparing apples to oranges (different time ranges, attribution windows)
When Client Won't Let You Share Numbers
Use directional language:
- "Doubled qualified leads within 90 days"
- "Reduced CPA by more than half"
- "Scaled to 6-figure monthly ad spend profitably"
Or anonymize: "A $5M revenue home services company"
Client Quote Formula
Best quotes cover one of:
- Outcome: "We had to hire 2 more technicians to keep up"
- Process: "They showed up, did the work, and delivered"
- Transformation: "Before working with this team, I was ready to shut down ads entirely"
Getting Good Quotes
- Ask open-ended questions: "What was the hardest part before we started?"
- Record the call, transcribe, extract best 1-3 sentences
- Edit lightly for readability; keep voice authentic
- Get written approval before publishing
Visual Elements
Must-Have Visuals
- Client logo (get permission, use correctly)
- Hero metric as large number graphic
- Before/after screenshots (dashboards, landing pages, ads)
- Timeline graphic showing key milestones
- Headshot + name + title of quoted person
Dashboard Screenshots
- Blur out account IDs, budgets if sensitive
- Crop to the relevant metric, not the whole dashboard
- Annotate with arrows/callouts for clarity
- Compare date ranges side-by-side when possible
Repurposing One Case Study
From a single client win, create:
- Long-form case study (website + PDF)
- One-pager (sales deck)
- LinkedIn carousel post (7-10 slides)
- LinkedIn text post
- Cold email snippet (1-2 sentence version)
- Sales call talk track (memorized 60-second version)
- Video testimonial (if client agrees)
- Before/after Instagram post (if visual-friendly)
- Podcast talking point (if you do media)
Case Study Template (Ready to Fill)
CLIENT: [Name or "A $X revenue [vertical] company"]
INDUSTRY: [Specific vertical]
LOCATION: [City, Country]
ENGAGEMENT: [Month/Year - Month/Year, or "Ongoing since X"]
HEADLINE:
[Outcome-focused, specific, with timeframe]
THE PROBLEM:
[Client's situation in their words/metrics]
[What they'd tried that failed]
[What was at stake]
THE APPROACH:
[Strategic decision 1 + why]
[Strategic decision 2 + why]
[Strategic decision 3 + why]
[Tools/systems deployed]
[Timeline of execution]
THE RESULTS:
• Headline metric: [X% improvement / $Y generated]
• Supporting metric 1
• Supporting metric 2
• Supporting metric 3
• Business outcome
CLIENT QUOTE:
"[2-3 sentences in client's voice]" - [Name], [Title], [Company]
NEXT STEPS:
[Current engagement status, what's next]Anti-Patterns
- Writing "we did X, Y, Z" without explaining why each decision was made
- Leading with your process instead of client's problem
- Burying the result at the bottom
- Using jargon the prospect doesn't understand
- Claims without numbers or concrete evidence
- Generic "we delivered amazing results" language
- No timeframe (was that "2x growth" over 10 years or 90 days?)
- Stolen stock photo headshots - readers spot these immediately
- Making the agency the hero instead of the client
Ethics & Approval
- Always get written approval before publishing
- Respect NDAs - some clients can only be anonymized
- Don't inflate or manipulate numbers
- Disclose material limitations (seasonal effects, other variables)
- If client asks to remove later, honor it
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

