agentleFS
flonatflonat/flonat-research/skills/project-deck/SKILL.md

project-deck

Skill150 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create a concise presentation deck that communicates a project's current state, decisions, evidence, risks, and next steps. Use when preparing a project update for collaborators, supervisors, or stakeholders. Not for a research talk centered on one paper; use $talk-deck.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before a supervisor meeting

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    When handing off to a coauthor

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    When returning to a dormant project

    line 33
  4. Distinctive:

    When making decks for yourself/coauthors:

    line 71

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Project Deck Skill

Create beautiful presentation decks to communicate project status to your future self and collaborators.

Purpose

Based on Scott Cunningham's Part 7: "Making Beautiful Decks For My Future Self" - using decks not for public speaking but to efficiently communicate work status across time and to coauthors.

The Philosophy

"I use decks to help me keep track of the work I was doing so that I can communicate it to my coauthors and myself later in the week when we meet to go over our projects."

Claude has absorbed the "rhetoric of decks" - the tacit knowledge about what makes presentations effective:

  • One idea per slide
  • Titles are assertions, not labels
  • Lead with conclusions
  • Visual hierarchy signals importance
  • Repeat for retention
  • Transition explicitly

When to Use

  • Before a supervisor meeting
  • At the end of a research sprint
  • When handing off to a coauthor
  • When returning to a dormant project
  • Weekly project status updates

Workflow

  1. Read project context - Progress logs, current focus, recent work
  2. Design deck structure:
    • Research question
    • What's been done (with figures/tables)
    • Key findings so far
    • Current blockers
    • Next steps
  3. Create beautiful output - Clean design, good typography, optimal cognitive density
  4. Include visuals - Figures, tables, diagrams that capture the work

Deck Rhetoric Principles

## Principles for Effective Decks

1. **One idea per slide** - Don't overload
2. **Titles are assertions** - "Distance increases abortion rates" not "Results"
3. **Lead with conclusions** - Don't bury the lede
4. **Visual hierarchy** - Most important things stand out
5. **Optimal cognitive density** - Smooth delivery, not overloaded
6. **Beautiful figures and tables** - Data visualisation matters
7. **Explicit transitions** - Guide the reader through the narrative

Extended Rhetoric Principles

For Research Decks

  • Motivation slides: Why should anyone care? What's the gap?
  • Methods slides: Identification strategy in plain English, visualize variation
  • Results slides: Lead with main coefficient, visualize where possible
  • Figures: Clear titles, labeled axes, no chartjunk

For "Decks as Thinking Tools"

When making decks for yourself/coauthors:

  1. Document decisions — Why did we choose this approach?
  2. Visualize data — Patterns you've discovered
  3. Track progress — What's done, what's next
  4. Summarize code — What scripts do what
  5. Capture context — So future-you remembers

Beamer Tips

  • Custom themes > recognizable templates
  • Metropolis or Madrid themes as starting points
  • Sans-serif fonts for readability
  • Generous margins and whitespace
  • Compile without warnings (fix overfull hboxes)

Example Prompt

"Create a project deck for my Indifference Adjustments paper. Read my progress logs and the current state of the project, then make a 10-slide deck that I can use in my supervisor meeting next week. Include the key figures and a clear 'what's next' section."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.