ideas
Skill150 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Capture and integrate improvement ideas for the shared Claude Code and Codex infrastructure. Use when recording an infrastructure enhancement for later review rather than implementing it immediately.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mheaus/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 6, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Mheaus/claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository89 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- beamer-deckSkill
- bib-coverageSkill
- bib-filterSkill
- bib-parseSkill
- brief-compliance-checkSkill
- camera-readySkill
- causal-designSkill
- checkpointSkill
- code-archaeologySkill
- compile-knowledgeSkill
- computational-experimentsSkill
- cross-language-checkSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- devils-advocateSkill
- docs-consistencySkill
- docxSkill
- experiment-designSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- init-project-courseSkill
- init-project-lightSkill
- init-project-orchestrationSkill
- init-projectSkill
- insights-deckSkill
- interview-meSkill
- knowledge-lintSkill
- latex-diffSkill
- latex-health-checkSkill
- latex-polishSkill
- latex-postersSkill
- latex-scaffoldSkill
- latexSkill
- latex-templateSkill
- lean-checkSkill
- math-proofSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- method-auditSkill
- multi-perspectiveSkill
- numerical-checkSkill
- pdfSkill
- pipeline-manifestSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- postmortemSkill
- pre-commit-auditSkill
- pre-submission-reportSkill
- project-deckSkill
- project-safetySkill
- proof-readabilitySkill
- proofreadSkill
- python-envSkill
- quarto-deckSkill
- reorgSkill
- replication-auditSkill
- replication-packageSkill
- retarget-journalSkill
- review-clusterSkill
- review-responseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 85
Read log/.ideas-state.json to find the last integration date.
- Very specific: line 89
Read log/ideas.md and collect all entries with Status: unprocessed (optionally filtered by date).
- Distinctive: line 113
Ask: "Which ideas should I act on?
- Distinctive: line 118
Investigations: Create a vault task in the Tasks Tracker with:
- Very specific: line 126
Update each processed entry's status in log/ideas.md:
- Very specific: line 144
When dryrun is specified, run steps 1-4 only — classify and present, but don't execute or update state.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ideas: Capture & Integrate
An inbox for improvement ideas — the gap between
[LEARN]tags (immediate corrections) andskill-extract(full skill creation). Captures raw improvement ideas and periodically integrates the best ones into the system.
Two Modes
| Mode | Trigger | What it does |
| Capture | ideas capture [text] | Append a structured idea entry to log/ideas.md |
| Integrate | ideas integrate | Review unprocessed ideas and turn them into actions |
Mode 1: Capture
With argument: ideas capture [text]
Parse the text and append a structured entry to log/ideas.md.
Without argument: ideas capture
Ask interactively:
- "What's the idea?" (free text)
- "Where did this come from?" (current session / external repo / user feedback / reading)
Entry Format
## [YYYY-MM-DD] [category] Idea title
- **Quality:** [high] | [medium]
- **Source:** [session | external:repo-name | user-feedback | reading:source]
- **Proposed action:** One-sentence description of what to do
- **Details:** [the idea text, expanded if needed]
- **Status:** unprocessedAuto-Classification
Classify each idea into one of these categories based on content:
| Category | Signal words / patterns |
[skill-design] | "new skill", "workflow for", "automate", "slash command" |
[rule] | "always", "never", "enforce", "prevent", "require" |
[workflow] | "process", "steps for", "how to handle", "protocol" |
[infrastructure] | "hook", "MCP", "settings", "permissions", "symlink" |
[research] | "method", "analysis", "paper", "experiment", "data" |
Quality Rating
| Rating | Criteria |
[high] | Specific, actionable, addresses a known friction point or recurring issue |
[medium] | Interesting but needs more thought, or addresses a minor convenience issue |
Skip [low] ideas — if it's not worth recording, don't record it.
After Capture
Confirm: "Idea captured in log/ideas.md. You have [N] unprocessed ideas — run ideas integrate when ready to act on them."
Mode 2: Integrate
Trigger: ideas integrate [since:YYYY-MM-DD] [dryrun]
Step 1: Read State
Read log/.ideas-state.json to find the last integration date. If since: argument is provided, use that instead. If no state file exists, process all entries.
Step 2: Gather Unprocessed Ideas
Read log/ideas.md and collect all entries with **Status:** unprocessed (optionally filtered by date).
Step 3: Classify Each Idea
For each unprocessed idea, classify as:
| Type | Description | Action |
| Direct proposal | Specific edit to a known file — can be implemented now | Present the edit for approval |
| Investigation | Needs research or design before implementation | Create a vault task |
| Duplicate | Already covered by an existing skill, rule, or convention | Mark as duplicate with reference |
| Declined | Not worth pursuing after reflection | Mark as declined with reason |
Step 4: Present for Approval
Show a summary table:
| # | Idea | Category | Quality | Proposed action | Classification |
|---|------|----------|---------|-----------------|---------------|
| 1 | ... | [rule] | [high] | ... | Direct proposal |
| 2 | ... | [skill-design] | [medium] | ... | Investigation |Ask: "Which ideas should I act on? (all / numbers / skip)"
Step 5: Execute Approved Ideas
- Direct proposals: Make the edit, following break-the-glass rules for protected files
- Investigations: Create a vault task in the Tasks Tracker with:
- Task name: "Investigate: [idea title]"
- Source: "Ideas inbox"
- Priority: High for
[high]quality, Medium for[medium] - Description: Full idea text + proposed approach
Step 6: Update State
Update each processed entry's status in log/ideas.md:
**Status:** implemented (YYYY-MM-DD)— direct proposal was executed**Status:** task-created (YYYY-MM-DD)— vault task created for investigation**Status:** duplicate → [reference]— already exists**Status:** declined — [reason]— not worth pursuing
Write log/.ideas-state.json:
{
"last_integration": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"total_captured": N,
"total_implemented": N,
"total_pending": N
}Dry Run Mode
When dryrun is specified, run steps 1-4 only — classify and present, but don't execute or update state. Useful for reviewing the backlog without committing to action.
Important Notes
- Ideas are not tasks — they're raw material that may or may not become actionable
- The capture threshold is deliberately low — if something seems worth noting, capture it
- Integration should happen periodically (weekly or when the backlog reaches 10+ ideas)
- This skill complements
[LEARN]tags (which record corrections) andskill-extract(which creates full skills) - Break-the-glass rules still apply — direct proposals that modify protected files need confirmation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

