init-project-course
Skill150 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Bootstrap a university course or module folder with the canonical teaching structure, guidance, and starter files. Use when creating or migrating a course workspace. Not for checking an existing course without modifying it; use $audit-project-course.
In this repository89 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- beamer-deckSkill
- bib-coverageSkill
- bib-filterSkill
- bib-parseSkill
- brief-compliance-checkSkill
- camera-readySkill
- causal-designSkill
- checkpointSkill
- code-archaeologySkill
- compile-knowledgeSkill
- computational-experimentsSkill
- cross-language-checkSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- devils-advocateSkill
- docs-consistencySkill
- docxSkill
- experiment-designSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- ideasSkill
- init-project-lightSkill
- init-project-orchestrationSkill
- init-projectSkill
- insights-deckSkill
- interview-meSkill
- knowledge-lintSkill
- latex-diffSkill
- latex-health-checkSkill
- latex-polishSkill
- latex-postersSkill
- latex-scaffoldSkill
- latexSkill
- latex-templateSkill
- lean-checkSkill
- math-proofSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- method-auditSkill
- multi-perspectiveSkill
- numerical-checkSkill
- pdfSkill
- pipeline-manifestSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- postmortemSkill
- pre-commit-auditSkill
- pre-submission-reportSkill
- project-deckSkill
- project-safetySkill
- proof-readabilitySkill
- proofreadSkill
- python-envSkill
- quarto-deckSkill
- reorgSkill
- replication-auditSkill
- replication-packageSkill
- retarget-journalSkill
- review-clusterSkill
- review-responseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
When the user says "organise this module", "init course", "set up this module folder"
- Distinctive: line 28
Read everything already in the directory before asking questions.
- Very specific: line 42
Check for existing organisation (already has lectures/, workshops/, etc.)
- Very specific: line 50
Use the available structured-question mechanism.
- Distinctive: line 60
If Phase 1 gave you enough, confirm your understanding instead of asking:
- Very specific: line 77
Follow the lean-guidance-files rule.
- Very specific: line 96
Create MEMORY.md using the appropriate template (student or instructor).
- Very specific: line 102
Create .claude/settings.local.json if missing.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Init Project Course
Bootstrap a university course or module folder into a clean, navigable structure. Designed for taught modules with lectures, workshops, assessments, and optionally recordings.
When to Use
- University modules with lectures + workshops + assessments
- Course folders that have accumulated files over a term
- When the user says "organise this module", "init course", "set up this module folder"
- Any taught course with recurring weekly components
When NOT to Use — Escalate
- To
init-project-lightif it's a one-off document collection (no lectures/workshops structure) - To
init-project-researchif it's a research project that happens to be for a course
Phase 1: Scan
Read everything already in the directory before asking questions.
- List all files and folders (excluding
.claude/,.DS_Store) - Identify content types:
- Lecture PDFs — files matching
Lecture*or containing "lecture" in name - Seminar materials — files matching
Seminar*,Session*, or containing "seminar" in name (discussion-based modules use seminars instead of lectures) - Lecture recordings — video files (
.mp4,.mov,.mkv,.webm,.avi) or folders namedrecordings - Workshop folders — folders matching
Workshop*,Lab*,Week*, or numbered folders with exercise content - Assessment folders — folders containing "group", "individual", "exam", "coursework", "assignment", "portfolio"
- Workshop PDFs — PDFs inside workshop folders that are NOT lectures (exercise sheets, briefs)
- Code projects —
node_modules/,package.json,.py,.js,.tsfiles inside workshop folders - Notes — personal notes, reading lists, exercise solutions (common in student modules)
- Lecture PDFs — files matching
- Detect duplicates: lecture PDFs that appear in multiple locations
- Note workshop numbering gaps (normal — not every week has a workshop)
- Check for existing organisation (already has
lectures/,workshops/, etc.)
Goal: Build a complete inventory so the interview is short.
Phase 2: Interview (4-5 questions max)
Use the available structured-question mechanism. Only ask what you couldn't infer from Phase 1.
Pick from these (skip any you can already answer):
- What module is this? — code + name (e.g., "IB9PK Advances in Behavioural Science")
- Are you a student or instructor? — determines template variant (see Phase 3)
- Who teaches it? — name(s) and role(s) (for student modules: instructor name; for instructor modules: module leader if different)
- What components exist? — lectures/seminars, workshops, group work, individual work, exams, recordings
- Status? — still in progress (more content coming) or archived/complete
If Phase 1 gave you enough, confirm your understanding instead of asking:
"This looks like [module code + name]. You're [student/instructor]. It has [N] workshops, [N] lecture PDFs, and [assessment types]. Still in progress. Correct?"
Always interview — even if scan is comprehensive. Course folders affect a full term of work; assumptions are expensive.
Phase 3: Organise
Present the proposed structure and wait for explicit approval before moving anything.
Full templates (student + instructor directory structures), workshop naming, lecture/recording/assessment handling rules: references/organise-templates.md
Phase 4: Create CLAUDE.md
Follow the lean-guidance-files rule. Include only:
- Module overview — code, name, institution, programme, credits, 1-2 sentence description
- People — instructor(s) and/or student, role
- Assessment — type(s), format, word count/page limit, deadline(s) if known
- Directory structure — compact tree of the organised layout
- Conventions — detectable patterns (LaTeX compilation, GitHub repo naming, submission format)
- Status note — "in progress" or "complete/archived", with note on what's still to come
Do NOT include:
- Lecture-by-lecture notes
- Workshop solution details
- Full assessment criteria (those live in
docs/orassessments/) - Anything that duplicates global rules
Phase 5: Seed MEMORY.md
Create MEMORY.md using the appropriate template (student or instructor). Templates, settings.local.json, and vault entry details: references/memory-and-settings.md
Phase 6: Settings
Create .claude/settings.local.json if missing. Full details: references/memory-and-settings.md
Phase 7: Vault Sync
Offer to create entries in the vault tracking for this module (Student or Instructor). Database IDs and field mappings: references/memory-and-settings.md
Phase 8: Confirmation
Short report:
Set up course project: <module code + name>
Role: Student / Instructor
Created:
- CLAUDE.md
- MEMORY.md (seeded with [student/instructor] template)
- lectures/ or seminars/ (N PDFs, deduplicated from M locations)
- notes/ (student only, if applicable)
- recordings/ (if applicable)
- workshops/ (N workshops, renamed from original folders)
- assessments/{types}/ (moved from original folders)
- docs/ (module specification, guidelines)
- [.claude/settings.local.json if created]
- [vault entry created in Modules Pipeline (Student/Instructor)]
Workshop naming:
"Workshop 1 - JavaScript Bootcamp" → workshops/01-javascript-bootcamp
"Workshop 6" → workshops/06-cwe-vulnerability-analysis
...Cross-References
| Skill | Relationship |
init-project-light | For non-course document collections |
init-project-research | For research projects within a course |
audit-project-course | Run later to check the structure is still clean |
update-project-doc | Run later to refresh CLAUDE.md if the module grows |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

