oscal-validator
Skill8 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Validate OSCAL documents for structural integrity, schema compliance, and OSCAL-specific requirements. Use this skill to check if OSCAL documents are properly formatted and meet NIST OSCAL specifications before processing.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- advanced-oscal-validatorSkill
- compliance-report-generatorSkill
- component-definition-builderSkill
- control-implementation-generatorSkill
- control-mapperSkill
- controls-extractorSkill
- evidence-collectorSkill
- oscal-catalog-providerSkill
- oscal-control-mapperSkill
- oscal-parserSkill
- oscal-ssp-validatorSkill
- oscal-text-converterSkill
- oscal-visualizerSkill
- risk-assessorSkill
- workflow-orchestratorSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when you need to:
- Distinctive: line 13
Verify an OSCAL document is properly formatted
- Distinctive: line 14
Check for missing required fields
- Distinctive: line 76
Verify document is not empty
- Very specific: line 81
Check for required metadata section
- Very specific: line 82
Verify title is present and non-empty
- Very specific: line 84
Check version is present
- Distinctive: line 88
Check document-level UUID exists
- Distinctive: line 95
Verify each reference resolves to existing element
- Distinctive: line 96
Check control-id references against imported catalogs
- Distinctive: line 107
Import-profile must reference valid profile
- Distinctive: line 146
When asked "Validate this SSP for compliance":
- Distinctive: line 149
Run all validation checks
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
OSCAL Validator Skill
Validate OSCAL documents against NIST schemas and perform structural integrity checks to ensure compliance data quality.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Verify an OSCAL document is properly formatted
- Check for missing required fields
- Validate UUIDs and cross-references
- Ensure metadata completeness
- Identify structural issues before further processing
✅ Data Source Principle
This skill validates documents you provide against structural rules and OSCAL schema requirements. Validation logic is safe — it checks format and syntax, not compliance content.
Note: For baseline completeness validation (e.g., "does this SSP cover all FedRAMP Moderate controls?"), you must also provide the baseline profile/catalog.
Validation Severity Levels
| Level | Meaning | Action Required |
| ERROR | Document is invalid | Must fix before use |
| WARNING | Potential issues | Should review |
| INFO | Suggestions | Optional improvements |
Validation Rules
Structure Validation (STRUCT)
| Rule | Description |
| STRUCT-001 | Document must not be empty or null |
| STRUCT-002 | Document must have a root element |
| STRUCT-003 | Root element must be a valid OSCAL model type |
Metadata Validation (META)
| Rule | Description |
| META-001 | Metadata section is required |
| META-002 | Title is required |
| META-003 | Last-modified timestamp is required |
| META-004 | Version is required |
| META-005 | OSCAL version should match current spec |
UUID Validation (UUID)
| Rule | Description |
| UUID-001 | Document UUID must be present |
| UUID-002 | UUIDs must be valid RFC 4122 format |
| UUID-003 | UUIDs must be unique within document |
Reference Validation (REF)
| Rule | Description |
| REF-001 | Internal references must resolve |
| REF-002 | Control references must exist |
| REF-003 | Party references must resolve |
How to Validate an OSCAL Document
Step 1: Check Basic Structure
- Verify document is not empty
- Confirm root element exists
- Validate root element is a valid OSCAL type
Step 2: Validate Metadata
- Check for required
metadatasection - Verify
titleis present and non-empty - Confirm
last-modifiedis valid ISO timestamp - Check
versionis present - Validate
oscal-versionmatches expected format
Step 3: Validate UUIDs
- Check document-level UUID exists
- Validate UUID format (8-4-4-4-12 hexadecimal)
- Build list of all UUIDs
- Check for duplicates
Step 4: Validate References
- Find all internal references (e.g.,
#uuid-value) - Verify each reference resolves to existing element
- Check control-id references against imported catalogs
- Validate party-uuid references
Step 5: Model-Specific Validation
For Catalogs:
- Groups should have controls
- Controls should have statements
- Parameters should have values or selections
For SSPs:
- Import-profile must reference valid profile
- System-characteristics must include system-ids
- Control-implementation must address all imported controls
For Component Definitions:
- Components must have titles
- Control implementations must reference valid controls
Validation Report Format
Provide validation results as:
VALIDATION REPORT
=================
Document: [filename]
Model Type: [type]
Valid: [YES/NO]
Issues Found:
- [SEVERITY] [RULE-ID]: [Message] at [location]
Summary:
- Errors: X
- Warnings: Y
- Info: ZCommon Issues and Fixes
| Issue | Cause | Fix |
| Missing metadata | Incomplete document | Add required metadata section |
| Invalid UUID | Malformed identifier | Generate new RFC 4122 UUID |
| Unresolved reference | Broken link | Update reference or add target |
| Missing timestamp | Incomplete metadata | Add ISO 8601 timestamp |
Example Usage
When asked "Validate this SSP for compliance":
- Parse the document
- Run all validation checks
- Collect issues by severity
- Report findings with specific locations
- Provide actionable fix recommendations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

