compliance-report-generator
Skill8 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate compliance reports from OSCAL assessment results, SSPs, and POA&Ms in various formats. Use this skill to create audit-ready documentation, executive summaries, and detailed compliance status reports.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- advanced-oscal-validatorSkill
- component-definition-builderSkill
- control-implementation-generatorSkill
- control-mapperSkill
- controls-extractorSkill
- evidence-collectorSkill
- oscal-catalog-providerSkill
- oscal-control-mapperSkill
- oscal-parserSkill
- oscal-ssp-validatorSkill
- oscal-text-converterSkill
- oscal-validatorSkill
- oscal-visualizerSkill
- risk-assessorSkill
- workflow-orchestratorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when you need to:
- Distinctive: line 13
Create audit-ready compliance documentation
- Distinctive: line 16
Create POA&M status reports
- Distinctive: line 242
When asked "Generate a compliance report for this SSP":
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Compliance Report Generator Skill
Generate professional compliance reports from OSCAL documents for audits, management reviews, and continuous monitoring.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Create audit-ready compliance documentation
- Generate executive summary reports
- Produce detailed control implementation reports
- Create POA&M status reports
- Build compliance dashboards data
⛔ Authoritative Data Requirement
Compliance reports are generated only from user-provided documents.
What This Skill Does
- Formats data FROM documents you provide into professional reports
- Calculates metrics based on YOUR document content
- Structures output for auditors and leadership
What This Skill Does NOT Do
- Generate compliance status from training knowledge
- Make up control implementation data
- Assume compliance percentages without source documents
Required Inputs
| Report Type | Required Documents |
| Compliance Status | SSP |
| Gap Analysis | Baseline Profile + SSP |
| Assessment Report | SAR (Assessment Results) |
| POA&M Report | POA&M document |
All Data Comes From Your Documents
To generate a compliance report, I need:
• Your SSP, POA&M, or assessment results document
• [For gap analysis] Your baseline profile
All metrics and status information will come directly from these
documents. I will not generate compliance data from assumptions.Report Types
| Type | Audience | Content |
| Executive Summary | Leadership | High-level metrics, risks, status |
| Compliance Status | Auditors | Control-by-control status |
| Assessment Report | Security Team | Detailed findings |
| POA&M Report | Program Managers | Remediation tracking |
| Gap Analysis | Implementers | Missing controls, recommendations |
Report Formats
- Markdown - Portable, version-controllable
- HTML - Interactive, shareable
- JSON - Machine-readable, API-friendly
- Text - Simple, universal
Report Components
Executive Summary
- Overall compliance percentage
- Risk level summary
- Key findings (top 3-5)
- Trend comparison
- Next steps
Compliance Metrics
Total Controls: 325
Implemented: 287 (88%)
Partially Implemented: 25 (8%)
Planned: 10 (3%)
Not Applicable: 3 (1%)Control Status Table
| Control | Title | Status | Evidence | Notes |
| AC-1 | Policy | ✅ Implemented | DOC-001 | Complete |
| AC-2 | Account Mgmt | ⚠️ Partial | DOC-002 | MFA pending |
Findings Summary
| Severity | Count | Description |
| Critical | 2 | Immediate action required |
| High | 5 | 30-day remediation |
| Moderate | 12 | 60-day remediation |
| Low | 8 | Monitor and address |
How to Generate Reports
Step 1: Gather Data
From the OSCAL document, extract:
- Metadata (system name, date, version)
- Control implementations
- Assessment results (if available)
- POA&M items (if available)
Step 2: Calculate Metrics
Compute:
- Implementation percentages by status
- Controls by family
- Findings by severity
- Trend data (if historical data available)
Step 3: Structure Content
For Executive Summary:
- System identification
- Overall compliance score
- Risk level
- Top findings
- Recommendations
For Detailed Report:
- Introduction and scope
- Methodology
- Compliance by control family
- Detailed findings
- Evidence references
- Recommendations
- Appendices
Step 4: Format Output
Markdown Format:
# Compliance Assessment Report
## Executive Summary
**System:** Cloud Infrastructure
**Assessment Date:** 2024-01-15
**Overall Compliance:** 88%
**Risk Level:** Moderate
## Key Findings
1. **MFA Not Fully Deployed** (HIGH)
- Impact: Credential theft risk
- Recommendation: Deploy MFA to all users by Q1
2. **Log Retention Below Policy** (MODERATE)
- Impact: Forensic capability limited
- Recommendation: Extend retention to 90 daysDocument-Specific Reports
From SSP
- System description
- Control implementation status
- Responsible parties
- Implementation narratives
From Assessment Results
- Assessment findings
- Risk determinations
- Evidence collected
- Assessor observations
From POA&M
- Open findings
- Remediation status
- Milestone tracking
- Resource allocation
Compliance Score Calculation
Compliance Score = (Implemented + (Partial × 0.5)) / (Total - Not_Applicable) × 100Example:
- Implemented: 280
- Partial: 20
- Planned: 10
- N/A: 15
- Total: 325
Score = (280 + (20 × 0.5)) / (325 - 15) × 100 = 93.5%
Report Templates
FedRAMP Status Report
AUTHORIZATION STATUS REPORT
===========================
System: [Name]
Authorization Date: [Date]
Sponsor: [Agency]
Current Status: [Authorized/In Progress]
Continuous Monitoring: [Active/Issues]
Control Summary:
- Baseline: [Moderate/High]
- Total Controls: [N]
- Implemented: [N] ([%])
POA&M Summary:
- Open Items: [N]
- Overdue: [N]
- Closed (30 days): [N]ISO 27001 Compliance Report
ISO 27001 COMPLIANCE REPORT
===========================
Organization: [Name]
Scope: [Description]
Report Date: [Date]
Statement of Applicability:
- Applicable Controls: [N]
- Implemented: [N] ([%])
- Excluded: [N] (with justification)
By Domain:
- A.5 Information Security Policies: [%]
- A.6 Organization of Information Security: [%]
...Example Usage
When asked "Generate a compliance report for this SSP":
- Parse the SSP document
- Extract metadata and system info
- Count controls by implementation status
- Calculate compliance percentage
- Identify top risks and gaps
- Generate formatted report
- Include recommendations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

