agentleFS
euCanneuCann/OSCAL-GRC-SKILLS/skills/evidence-collector/SKILL.md

evidence-collector

Skill8 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Plan and manage security evidence collection for compliance audits and assessments. Use this skill to identify required evidence, track collection status, and ensure audit readiness.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when you need to:

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Create evidence collection plans

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Read the control statement

    line 84
  4. Distinctive:

    When asked "What evidence do I need for FedRAMP audit?":

    line 239

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Evidence Collector Skill

Plan and manage the collection of security evidence for compliance audits, continuous monitoring, and assessment activities.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Identify evidence requirements for controls
  • Create evidence collection plans
  • Track evidence collection status
  • Validate evidence completeness
  • Prepare for compliance audits

⛔ Authoritative Data Requirement

Evidence requirements are derived from user-provided control baselines and SSPs.

What Requires Source Documents

TaskRequired Source
Evidence requirements per controlBaseline or catalog showing what's required
Control-specific artifactsYour SSP showing implementation approach
Assessment-specific evidenceAssessment plan (SAP)

What You CAN Provide (Methodology)

  • General evidence types and categories
  • Collection best practices
  • Evidence package structure templates
  • Frequency recommendations
  • Quality assessment frameworks

Example: Safe vs Unsafe

✅ Safe: "For access control policies, typical evidence includes policy documents, approval records, and review logs."

⛔ Unsafe: "AC-2 requires you to collect user account listings monthly and maintain them for 3 years." (← Specific requirements must come from your baseline/profile)


Evidence Types

TypeDescriptionExamples
ConfigurationSystem settingsConfig exports, screenshots
Log FileAudit logsSIEM exports, access logs
DocumentPolicies, proceduresPDF, Word documents
ScreenshotVisual proofSystem UI captures
Scan ResultSecurity scansVulnerability reports
CertificateCredentialsSSL certs, attestations
Test ResultValidation outputPen test reports
InterviewVerbal confirmationMeeting notes

Evidence Sources

SourceAutomationReliability
Automated ScanHighHigh
System ExportHighHigh
Manual CollectionLowVariable
Third PartyLowHigh
InterviewNoneVariable

Collection Status

StatusMeaning
PendingNot yet collected
CollectedObtained but not verified
VerifiedReviewed and validated
ExpiredPast retention period
FailedCollection unsuccessful

How to Plan Evidence Collection

Step 1: Identify Control Requirements

For each control:

  1. Read the control statement
  2. Identify what must be demonstrated
  3. List evidence that proves compliance

Step 2: Map Evidence to Controls

ControlEvidence RequiredTypeSource
AC-1Access control policyDocumentManual
AC-2User account listingConfigurationAutomated
AU-2Audit log samplesLog FileSystem Export

Step 3: Create Collection Plan

For each evidence item:

evidence_plan:
  control_id: AC-2
  evidence_type: configuration
  title: Active Directory User Listing
  description: Complete list of all user accounts
  collection_method: PowerShell export
  frequency: Monthly
  retention: 1 year
  responsible_party: IT Admin
  automated: true

Step 4: Define Collection Frequency

Control TypeRecommended Frequency
ConfigurationMonthly
Access ReviewsQuarterly
PoliciesAnnually
Vulnerability ScansWeekly
Penetration TestsAnnually

Evidence Requirements by Control Family

Access Control (AC)

  • User account listings
  • Access approval documentation
  • Privilege reviews
  • Access control policy

Audit (AU)

  • Audit log samples (30+ days)
  • Log retention settings
  • Alert configurations
  • Log review procedures

Configuration Management (CM)

  • Baseline configurations
  • Change management records
  • Configuration scan results
  • Inventory listings

Incident Response (IR)

  • IR policy and procedures
  • Incident tickets/records
  • Tabletop exercise results
  • Communication plans

Evidence Package Structure

evidence/
├── AC-2/
│   ├── user_listing_2024-01.csv
│   ├── user_listing_2024-02.csv
│   └── access_review_Q1.pdf
├── AU-2/
│   ├── audit_logs_sample.json
│   └── siem_config.png
└── manifest.json

Evidence Manifest

{
  "package_id": "EVD-2024-001",
  "control_id": "AC-2",
  "collection_date": "2024-01-15",
  "items": [
    {
      "id": "EVD-001",
      "title": "User Account Listing",
      "file": "user_listing_2024-01.csv",
      "hash": "sha256:abc123...",
      "collector": "IT Admin",
      "status": "verified"
    }
  ],
  "completeness_score": 0.95,
  "gaps": ["Missing service accounts"]
}

Completeness Scoring

Calculate evidence completeness:

Completeness = (Verified Items / Required Items) × 100

Scores:

  • 100%: Fully documented
  • 80-99%: Minor gaps
  • 60-79%: Significant gaps
  • <60%: Major deficiencies

Audit Preparation Checklist

30 Days Before Audit

  • Identify all required evidence
  • Verify evidence is current
  • Fill collection gaps
  • Review evidence quality

7 Days Before Audit

  • Organize evidence by control
  • Create evidence index
  • Verify access for auditors
  • Brief responsible parties

Day of Audit

  • Evidence accessible
  • SMEs available
  • Backup copies ready

Output Format

EVIDENCE COLLECTION STATUS
==========================
Control: AC-2 (Account Management)
Required Evidence: 5 items
Collected: 4 items (80%)

Evidence Items:
✅ User account listing (collected 2024-01-15)
✅ Account approval workflow (collected 2024-01-10)
✅ Quarterly access review (collected 2024-01-05)
✅ Termination checklist (collected 2024-01-12)
❌ Service account inventory (MISSING)

Gaps:
- Service account inventory not collected
  Recommendation: Export from AD, due by 2024-01-20

Example Usage

When asked "What evidence do I need for FedRAMP audit?":

  1. Get baseline controls (Moderate = 325 controls)
  2. For each control family, list evidence requirements
  3. Identify automation opportunities
  4. Create collection schedule
  5. Assign responsible parties
  6. Generate collection plan document

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.