security-detection-rule-management
Skill583 starsChanged 58 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Create, tune, and manage Elastic Security detection rules (SIEM and Endpoint). Use for false positives, exceptions, new coverage, noisy rules, or rule management via Kibana API.
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Create new detection rules for emerging threats and coverage gaps, and tune existing rules to reduce false positives.
- Very specific: line 19
All operations use the Kibana Detection Engine API via rule-manager.js.
- Very specific: line 23
Start executing tools immediately — do not read SKILL.md, browse the workspace, or list files first.
- Distinctive: line 26
When a tool returns an error (rule not found, API failure), report the exact error — do not guess at alternatives.
- Very specific: line 74
Look for patterns: same process/user/host → exception candidate.
- Very specific: line 115
Write operations (patch, enable, disable, delete, add-exception, bulk-action) prompt for confirmation by default.
- Very specific: line 118
Verify with rule-manager.js get --id <rule_uuid>.
- Very specific: line 195
Key principles: Always fetch the rule definition from protections-artifacts first.
- Distinctive: line 213
All commands are run from the workspace root.
- Distinctive: line 257
Report only tool output: When summarizing results, quote or paraphrase only what the tools returned.
- Distinctive: line 259
Preserve identifiers from the request: If the user provides specific hostnames, agent IDs, case IDs, or other values, use those exact …
- Distinctive: line 261
Confirm actions concisely: After executing a tool, confirm what was done using the tool's return data.
- Distinctive: line 263
Distinguish facts from inference: If you draw conclusions beyond what the tools returned (e.g., suggesting a MITRE technique based on …
- Very specific: line 266
Start executing tools immediately: Do not read SKILL.md, browse directories, or list files before acting.
- Very specific: line 272
All write operations (create, patch, enable, disable, delete, add-exception, bulk-action, add-endpoint-exception) prompt for confirmation.
- Very specific: line 274
Endpoint exceptions suppress detections globally: Always scope exceptions to a specific rule using rule.id or rule.name in the entries.
- Distinctive: line 276
Verify environment variables point to the intended cluster before running any script.
- Very specific: line 277
Use --dry-run with bulk-action to preview impact before executing bulk changes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Detection Rule Management
Create new detection rules for emerging threats and coverage gaps, and tune existing rules to reduce false positives.
All operations use the Kibana Detection Engine API via rule-manager.js.
Execution rules
- Start executing tools immediately — do not read SKILL.md, browse the workspace, or list files first.
- Report tool output faithfully. Copy rule IDs, names, alert counts, exception IDs, and error messages exactly as returned by the API. Do not abbreviate rule UUIDs, invent rule names, or round alert counts.
- When a tool returns an error (rule not found, API failure), report the exact error — do not guess at alternatives.
Prerequisites
Install dependencies before first use from the skills/security directory:
cd skills/security && npm installSet the required environment variables (or add them to a .env file in the workspace root):
export ELASTICSEARCH_URL="https://your-cluster.es.cloud.example.com:443"
export ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY="your-api-key"
export KIBANA_URL="https://your-cluster.kb.cloud.example.com:443"
export KIBANA_API_KEY="your-kibana-api-key"Common multi-step workflows
| Task | Tools to call (in order) |
| Tune noisy SIEM rule | rule_manager find/noisy-rules → run_query (investigate FPs) → rule_manager patch or add-exception |
| Add endpoint behavior exception | fetch_endpoint_rule (get rule definition from GitHub) → add_endpoint_exception (scoped to rule.id) |
| Create new detection rule | run_query (test query against data) → rule_manager create |
| Investigate rule alert volume | rule_manager get → run_query (query alerts index) |
For endpoint behavior rules, always fetch the rule definition first to understand query logic and existing exclusions
before adding an exception. For SIEM rules, always investigate alert patterns with run_query before tuning.
Critical: For endpoint behavior rules, always use fetch_endpoint_rule (not shell or direct script calls) to get
the rule definition, then use add_endpoint_exception to add the exception. These are dedicated tools — do not invoke
the underlying scripts manually.
Workflow: Tune a rule for false positives
Steps 1–2: Identify noisy rules and analyze false positives
Find noisy rules with noisy-rules or find, then get the rule definition and investigate alerts:
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js noisy-rules --days 7 --top 20
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js find --filter "alert.attributes.name:*Suspicious*" --brief
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js get --id <rule_uuid>
node skills/security/alert-triage/scripts/run-query.js "kibana.alert.rule.name:\"<rule_name>\"" --index ".alerts-security.alerts-*" --days 7 --fullLook for patterns: same process/user/host → exception candidate; broad pattern → tighten query; legitimate software → exception; too broad → rewrite or adjust threshold.
Step 3: Choose a tuning strategy
In order of preference:
- Add exception — Best for specific known-good processes, users, or hosts. Does not modify the rule query. Use when the rule is correct in general but fires on known-legitimate activity.
- Tighten the query — Patch the rule's query to exclude the FP pattern. Best when the false positives stem from the query being too broad.
- Adjust threshold / alert suppression — For threshold rules, increase the threshold value. For any rule type, enable alert suppression to reduce duplicate alerts on the same entity.
- Reduce risk score / severity — Downgrade the rule's priority if it generates many low-value alerts but still has some detection value.
- Disable the rule — Last resort. Only if the rule provides no value or is completely redundant with another rule.
Steps 4–5: Apply tuning, verify, and document
Add exception (single/multi-condition, wildcard via matches):
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js add-exception \
--rule-uuid <rule_uuid> \
--entries "process.executable:is:C:\\Program Files\\SCCM\\CcmExec.exe" "process.parent.name:is:CcmExec.exe" \
--name "Exclude SCCM" --comment "FP: SCCM deployment" --tags "tuning:fp" "source:soc" --yesPatch query, threshold, severity, or disable:
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js patch --id <rule_uuid> --query "process.name:powershell.exe AND NOT process.parent.name:CcmExec.exe" --yes
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js patch --id <rule_uuid> --max-signals 50 --yes
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js patch --id <rule_uuid> --severity low --risk-score 21 --yes
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js disable --id <rule_uuid> --yesWrite operations (patch, enable, disable, delete, add-exception, bulk-action) prompt for confirmation by
default. Pass --yes to skip the prompt (required when called by an agent).
Verify with rule-manager.js get --id <rule_uuid>. Update triage cases via the case-management skill.
Workflow: Create new detection rule
Steps 1–2: Define the threat, data sources, and fields
Specify MITRE ATT&CK technique(s), required data sources (Endpoint, Network, Cloud), and malicious vs legitimate
behavior. Common indexes: logs-endpoint.events.process-*, logs-endpoint.events.network-*,
.alerts-security.alerts-*, logs-windows.*, logs-aws.*. Key fields: process.name, process.command_line,
process.parent.name, destination.ip, winlog.event_id, event.action. Verify data with run-query.js:
node skills/security/alert-triage/scripts/run-query.js "process.name:certutil.exe" --index "logs-endpoint.events.process-*" --days 30 --size 5Step 3: Write and test the query
Rule types: query (KQL field matching), eql (event sequences), esql (aggregations), threshold (volume-based),
threat_match (IOC correlation), new_terms (first-seen). Test against Elasticsearch before creating:
node skills/security/alert-triage/scripts/run-query.js "process.name:certutil.exe AND process.command_line:(*urlcache* OR *decode*)" \
--index "logs-endpoint.events.process-*" --days 30For EQL, use --query-file to avoid shell escaping issues.
Validate query syntax before creating or patching a rule. The validate-query command catches common errors locally
— escaped backslashes, mismatched parentheses, unbalanced quotes, and duplicate boolean operators:
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js validate-query \
--query "process.name:taskkill.exe AND process.command_line:(*chrome.exe* OR *msedge.exe*)" --language kueryThe create and patch commands also run validation automatically and reject invalid queries. Pass --skip-validation
only if you are certain the query is correct despite triggering a check.
Common KQL syntax mistakes:
- Escaped forward-slashes — KQL wildcards use plain text. Write
*/IM chrome.exe*, not*\/IM chrome.exe*. - Mismatched parentheses — every
(must have a matching). - Unbalanced quotes — every
"must be paired. - Duplicate operators —
AND ANDorOR ORis always an error.
Step 4: Create the rule
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js create \
--name "Certutil URL Download or Decode" \
--description "Detects certutil.exe used to download files or decode Base64 payloads, a common LOLBin technique." \
--type query \
--query "process.name:certutil.exe AND process.command_line:(*urlcache* OR *decode*)" \
--index "logs-endpoint.events.process-*" \
--severity medium --risk-score 47 \
--tags "OS:Windows" "Tactic:Defense Evasion" "Tactic:Command and Control" \
--false-positives "IT administrators using certutil for legitimate certificate operations" \
--references "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1140/" \
--interval 5m --disabledFor complex rules (EQL sequences, MITRE mappings, alert suppression), use create --from-file rule_definition.json and
--threat-file. See references/detection-api-reference.md for schema.
Step 5: Monitor and iterate
Monitor alert volume with noisy-rules --days 3 --top 10 and tune false positives as needed.
Workflow: Endpoint behavior rules tuning
Tune Elastic Endpoint behavior rules by adding Endpoint exceptions scoped to specific rules. Endpoint exceptions live in Security → Exceptions → Endpoint Security Exception List, not under individual SIEM rules.
Key principles: Always fetch the rule definition from protections-artifacts first. Always scope exceptions to the
rule (rule.id or rule.name). Use full paths over process names. Run the mandatory entity cross-check (Step 4b)
before any exception. Simulate impact (Step 5b) and aim for ≥60% noise reduction.
Scripts: fetch-endpoint-rule-from-github.js (get rule TOML by id), add-endpoint-exception.js (add to Endpoint
Exception List; rule.id/rule.name required), check-exclusion-best-practices.js.
For the full step-by-step workflow (Steps 1–6), queries, and simulation templates, see references/endpoint-behavior-tuning-workflow.md. For exclusion best practices, see references/endpoint-rule-exclusion-best-practices.md.
Tool reference
rule-manager.js
All commands are run from the workspace root. All output is JSON unless noted.
| Command | Description |
find | Search/list rules with optional KQL filter |
get | Get a rule by --id or --rule-id |
create | Create a rule (inline flags or --from-file) |
patch | Patch specific fields on a rule |
enable | Enable a rule |
disable | Disable a rule |
delete | Delete a rule |
export | Export rules as NDJSON |
bulk-action | Bulk enable/disable/delete/duplicate/edit |
add-exception | Add an exception item to a rule |
list-exceptions | List items on an exception list |
create-shared-list | Create a shared exception list |
noisy-rules | Find noisiest rules by alert volume |
validate-query | Check query syntax before create/patch |
Endpoint behavior tuning: fetch-endpoint-rule-from-github.js (get rule TOML by id), add-endpoint-exception.js
(add to Endpoint Exception List; rule.id/rule.name required), check-exclusion-best-practices.js.
Exception entry format
Pass entries as field:operator:value. Operators: is, is_not, is_one_of, is_not_one_of, exists,
does_not_exist, matches, does_not_match. Example: process.name:is:svchost.exe,
file.path:matches:C:\\Program Files\\*.
Additional resources
- For full API schema details, see references/detection-api-reference.md
- For endpoint behavior tuning: references/endpoint-exceptions-guide.md, references/endpoint-rule-exclusion-best-practices.md
- For alert investigation during tuning, use the
alert-triageskill - For documenting tuning actions in cases, use the
case-managementskill
Examples
- "Find the noisiest detection rules from the last 7 days and help me tune one"
- "Add an exception to exclude SCCM from the suspicious PowerShell rule"
- "Create a new detection rule for certutil URL download or decode"
Guidelines
- Report only tool output. When summarizing results, quote or paraphrase only what the tools returned. Do not invent IDs, hostnames, IPs, scores, process trees, or other details not present in the tool response.
- Preserve identifiers from the request. If the user provides specific hostnames, agent IDs, case IDs, or other values, use those exact values in tool calls and responses — do not substitute different identifiers.
- Confirm actions concisely. After executing a tool, confirm what was done using the tool's return data. Do not fabricate internal IDs, metadata, or status details unless they appear in the tool response.
- Distinguish facts from inference. If you draw conclusions beyond what the tools returned (e.g., suggesting a MITRE technique based on observed behavior), clearly label those as your assessment rather than presenting them as tool output.
- Start executing tools immediately. Do not read SKILL.md, browse directories, or list files before acting.
- Report tool output verbatim. Copy rule IDs, names, alert counts, and error messages exactly as returned. Do not abbreviate UUIDs or round numbers.
Production use
- All write operations (
create,patch,enable,disable,delete,add-exception,bulk-action,add-endpoint-exception) prompt for confirmation. Pass--yesor-yto skip when called by an agent. - Endpoint exceptions suppress detections globally. Always scope exceptions to a specific rule using
rule.idorrule.namein the entries. A broad, unscoped exception can silently reduce detection coverage. - Verify environment variables point to the intended cluster before running any script.
- Use
--dry-runwithbulk-actionto preview impact before executing bulk changes.
Environment variables
| Variable | Required | Description |
ELASTICSEARCH_URL | Yes | Elasticsearch URL (for noisy-rules aggregation) |
ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY | Yes | Elasticsearch API key |
KIBANA_URL | Yes | Kibana URL (for rules API) |
KIBANA_API_KEY | Yes | Kibana API key |
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- elastic/cursor-plugins★ 33100% same
- elastic/claude-plugin★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository51 other files it gives its agents.
- cloud-onboardingSkill
- cloud-provisioningSkill
- elasticsearch-anomaly-detection-explainerSkill
- elasticsearch-anomaly-detectionSkill
- elasticsearch-cluster-healthSkill
- elasticsearch-esqlSkill
- elasticsearch-index-designSkill
- elasticsearch-ingestSkill
- elasticsearch-onboardingSkill
- elasticsearch-query-optimizationSkill
- elasticsearch-reindexSkill
- elasticsearch-search-relevanceSkill
- kibana-agent-builderSkill
- kibana-alerting-rulesSkill
- kibana-anomaly-detectionSkill
- kibana-dashboardsSkill
- kibana-workflowsSkill
- observability-k8s-investigationSkill
- observability-llm-obsSkill
- observability-onboardingSkill
- observability-service-reliabilitySkill
- observability-sre-triageSkill
- security-alert-triageSkill
- security-case-managementSkill
- security-detection-rule-managementSkill
- security-generate-security-sample-dataSkill
- cloud-onboardingSkill
- cloud-provisioningSkill
- elasticsearch-anomaly-detection-explainerSkill
- elasticsearch-anomaly-detectionSkill
- elasticsearch-cluster-healthSkill
- elasticsearch-esqlSkill
- elasticsearch-index-designSkill
- elasticsearch-ingestSkill
- elasticsearch-onboardingSkill
- elasticsearch-query-optimizationSkill
- elasticsearch-reindexSkill
- elasticsearch-search-relevanceSkill
- kibana-agent-builderSkill
- kibana-alerting-rulesSkill
- kibana-anomaly-detectionSkill
- kibana-dashboardsSkill
- kibana-workflowsSkill
- observability-k8s-investigationSkill
- observability-llm-obsSkill
- observability-onboardingSkill
- observability-service-reliabilitySkill
- observability-sre-triageSkill
- security-alert-triageSkill
- security-case-managementSkill
- security-generate-security-sample-dataSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

