agentleFS
ElasticKnown publisherelastic/agent-skills/skills/elasticsearch/elasticsearch-index-design/SKILL.md

elasticsearch-index-design

Skill583 starsChanged 58 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Design and review Elasticsearch index mappings for stated access patterns: correct field types, text+keyword multi-fields, doc_values tuning, mapping-explosion avoidance, and explicit shard settings. Use when creating a new index, reviewing a mapping for storage or query performance, fixing wrong field types, or when the user asks which type to use for search, filter, sort, or aggregation on a field.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Gather access patterns per field: Before choosing types, list how each field is used.

    line 41
  2. Very specific:

    Call GET / to confirm connectivity.

    line 50
  3. Very specific:

    Multi-field rule: When a field must be searchable and sortable/aggregatable (e.g.

    line 69
  4. Very specific:

    Create with PUT /products passing the settings and mappings blocks.

    line 105
  5. Very specific:

    Prefer "dynamic": "strict" on the root mapping unless unknown fields are an explicit requirement.

    line 122
  6. Very specific:

    Do not attempt in-place mapping fixes for these type changes — they are rejected or leave data inconsistent.

    line 158
  7. Distinctive:

    When the user supplies a mapping JSON and usage notes, walk this checklist in order:

    line 163

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Elasticsearch Index Design

Design explicit index mappings from access patterns, review existing mappings for type and storage mistakes, and apply corrections through a new index plus reindex when field types must change.

<!-- begin-partial: preamble -->

Environment Configuration

This skill executes Elasticsearch operations through the elastic CLI. If the elastic CLI is not installed, tell the user what it is needed for. Do not guess credentials, call the HTTP API directly, or attempt other workarounds.

This skill references operations in HTTP-shorthand form (e.g., GET /, GET /_cat/indices, GET /{index}/_mapping, GET /{index}/_settings/index.mode, POST /_query). The Operations table at the end of this document maps each shorthand to the equivalent elastic CLI command — always use the CLI rather than calling the HTTP API directly.

<!-- end-partial: preamble -->

Process

  1. Gather access patterns per field. Before choosing types, list how each field is used. For every field capture:

    • Search — full-text match, phrase, relevance scoring?
    • Filter — exact term, terms set, prefix?
    • Aggregate — terms, cardinality, histogram, stats?
    • Sort — ascending/d descending in result sets?
    • Retrieve only — returned in _source but never queried?

    The decision: classify each field into one primary access pattern (search, exact, numeric metric, date, boolean, structured object, or retrieve-only). Missing access-pattern data is a blocker — ask the user rather than guessing. Call GET / to confirm connectivity; when reviewing an existing index, call GET /{index}/_mapping to ground the discussion in the current mapping.

  2. Choose field types from access patterns. Map each field to the minimal type set that satisfies its pattern. Read Field Type Decisions and Multi-Field Patterns before proposing mappings.

    Key judgments:

    PatternMapping
    Full-text search onlytext (no keyword sub-field)
    Filter / agg / sort onlykeyword (not text)
    Full-text search and sort or aggregationtext with fields.keyword multi-field
    Decimal price or metricdouble, float, or scaled_float — not text or integer
    Timestampdate
    True/false flagboolean
    Free-form key/value map with many distinct keysflattened — not dynamic object

    Multi-field rule: When a field must be searchable and sortable/aggregatable (e.g. product name), map it as text with a keyword sub-field — search on name, sort and aggregate on name.keyword. Mapping as only text or only keyword is wrong for that combined pattern.

    Explicit mapping rule: For new indices, always define mappings explicitly with PUT /{index}. Do not rely on dynamic mapping for production indices — the first document can lock in wrong types (strings as text, ambiguous numbers as keyword).

    Index settings: Set deliberate number_of_shards and number_of_replicas in the same PUT /{index} request when the deployment allows it (Self-Managed / Elastic Cloud Hosted). On Serverless, omit shard and replica counts (Elastic manages them); still supply explicit mappings. State chosen values or document that defaults apply.

    Example — products index optimized for search plus sort/agg on name:

    {
      "settings": {
        "number_of_shards": 1,
        "number_of_replicas": 1
      },
      "mappings": {
        "properties": {
          "name": {
            "type": "text",
            "fields": {
              "keyword": { "type": "keyword", "ignore_above": 256 }
            }
          },
          "price": { "type": "double" },
          "created": { "type": "date" },
          "in_stock": { "type": "boolean" }
        }
      }
    }

    Create with PUT /products passing the settings and mappings blocks. Verify with GET /products/_mapping.

  3. Guard against mapping explosion and storage bloat. On high-volume indices, type mistakes multiply cost. Read Mapping Explosion and Storage Bloat and apply these review checks:

    • Analyzed-but-not-searched fields — Fields used only for filter and aggregation (url, HTTP status_code, tags, IDs) must be keyword, not text. text wastes space; aggregations on text require fielddata or a .keyword sub-field that should not exist if the field is not searched.
    • message.keyword without ignore_above — A keyword sub-field on a large full-text body indexes the entire raw string as one term. Flag this anti-pattern; remove the sub-field when only full-text search is needed, or add ignore_above when a bounded exact-match sub-field is truly required.
    • Dynamic free-form objects — object with "dynamic": true on user-supplied key/value data with thousands of distinct keys causes mapping explosion. Recommend flattened (or strict dynamic / allowlist strategy).
    • doc_values: false — On fields retrieved in hits but never sorted, aggregated, or filtered (e.g. display-only session_id), set "doc_values": false on keyword to save disk at scale.
    • scaled_float — For metrics with bounded precision (e.g. response_time_ms), prefer scaled_float with an appropriate scaling_factor over plain float/double when storage dominates.

    Prefer "dynamic": "strict" on the root mapping unless unknown fields are an explicit requirement.

  4. Apply design: create new index and reindex when types change. Elasticsearch cannot change an existing field's type in place. When review finds wrong types (text→keyword, object→flattened, float→scaled_float, doc_values changes on existing fields), state clearly that fixes require a new index and reindex — not a mapping update on the live index.

    Workflow for correcting an existing high-volume index such as events:

    1. Design the corrected mapping on a new index name (e.g. events-v2) incorporating all fixes from steps 2–3.
    2. Create the destination with PUT /events-v2 and the full corrected mappings (and settings where applicable).
    3. Copy documents with POST /_reindex — for large indices use wait_for_completion=false and track the task. Source: { "index": "events" }, destination: { "index": "events-v2" }.
    4. Verify with GET /events-v2/_count (compare to source count) and GET /events-v2/_mapping (confirm types).
    5. Cut over reads and writes (index alias swap or application config) after validation.

    Example corrected excerpt for the events review pattern:

    {
      "mappings": {
        "properties": {
          "@timestamp": { "type": "date" },
          "event_id": { "type": "keyword" },
          "session_id": { "type": "keyword", "doc_values": false },
          "url": { "type": "keyword" },
          "status_code": { "type": "keyword" },
          "response_time_ms": { "type": "scaled_float", "scaling_factor": 100 },
          "tags": { "type": "keyword" },
          "message": { "type": "text" },
          "labels": { "type": "flattened" }
        }
      }
    }

    Do not attempt in-place mapping fixes for these type changes — they are rejected or leave data inconsistent. For greenfield indices, a single PUT /{index} before first ingest avoids reindex entirely.

Review checklist

When the user supplies a mapping JSON and usage notes, walk this checklist in order:

  1. Match each field's type to its stated access pattern (see step 2).
  2. Flag text on filter/agg-only fields; flag missing multi-fields where search and sort/agg share one logical field.
  3. Flag message.keyword (or similar) without ignore_above on large analyzed text.
  4. Flag dynamic object on high-cardinality free-form maps; recommend flattened.
  5. Propose retrieve-only and numeric storage optimizations (doc_values: false, scaled_float).
  6. State that type changes require a new index and POST /_reindex, then show the corrected mapping and reindex plan.

Examples

"Users search product names and also sort and aggregate on them" — one logical field, two access patterns, so use a text field with a keyword multi-field:

{
  "mappings": {
    "properties": {
      "product_name": { "type": "text", "fields": { "keyword": { "type": "keyword", "ignore_above": 256 } } }
    }
  }
}

"A status field is only ever filtered and aggregated, never full-text searched" — use keyword, not text:

{ "mappings": { "properties": { "status": { "type": "keyword" } } } }

"Free-form labels object with unbounded keys" — avoid mapping explosion with flattened:

{ "mappings": { "properties": { "labels": { "type": "flattened" } } } }

Guidelines

  • Minimal mapping — Map only what access patterns require; every sub-field and analyzed form adds indexed data.
  • Never guess access patterns — Wrong type choice is expensive to fix at scale.
  • Verify after create — Always confirm with GET /{index}/_mapping; use GET /{index}/_count after reindex.
  • Cross-skill boundary — Copying documents between indices is POST /_reindex (see the reindex skill for slicing, throttling, and task tracking). Loading files into a new index is bulk ingest, not index design.

Reference material

  • Field Type Decisions — access-pattern-to-type table and common mistakes
  • Multi-Field Patterns — text+keyword, ignore_above, anti-patterns
  • Mapping Explosion and Storage Bloat — flattened, doc_values, dynamic objects

Operations

HTTP API (shorthand)elastic CLI command
GET /elastic es info
GET /{index}/_mappingelastic es indices get-mapping --index '<index>'
PUT /{index}elastic es indices create --index '<index>' --mappings '<json>' --settings '<json>'
POST /_reindexelastic es reindex --source '<json>' --dest '<json>'
POST /_reindex?wait_for_completion=falseelastic es reindex --wait-for-completion false --source '<json>' --dest '<json>'
GET /{index}/_countelastic es count --index '<index>'

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.