agentleFS
drafthqdrafthq/draft/skills/revert/SKILL.md

revert

Skill40 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Git-aware revert that understands Draft tracks, phases, and tasks. Safely undo work at task, phase, or track level. Use when the user asks to 'revert this track', 'undo a phase', 'revert task X', or says 'roll back the last task', 'undo this work'.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Not checking for uncommitted changes first

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Not updating Draft state after git revert

    line 16
  3. Very specific:

    If draft/ does not exist: STOP — "No Draft context found.

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    Run git status --porcelain.

    line 34
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask user what level to revert:

    line 40
  6. Distinctive:

    If user specifies by name/description, find the matching commits.

    line 46
  7. Very specific:

    Primary method: Read plan.md — every completed task has its commit SHA recorded inline.

    line 50
  8. Distinctive:

    Fallback method (if SHAs missing but completed tasks exist): Search git log by track ID pattern:

    line 54
  9. Very specific:

    Cross-reference: Verify SHAs from plan.md match the git log results.

    line 71
  10. Very specific:

    Read draft/workflow.md → ## Toolchain section for VCS CLI.

    line 108
  11. Distinctive:

    Remove the commit SHA from the reverted task line

    line 128
  12. Very specific:

    Update draft/tracks.md if track status changed

    line 137
  13. Very specific:

    Stale reports: After revert, existing review-report-latest.md and bughunt-report-latest.md for the track are stale.

    line 139
  14. Very specific:

    If the process is interrupted between git revert and Draft state update, the recovery procedure is: check git log for the revert commit, …

    line 162
  15. Distinctive:

    If user says no to preview:

    line 168
  16. Distinctive:

    If git revert has conflicts:

    line 174

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Draft Revert

Perform intelligent git revert that understands Draft's logical units of work.

Red Flags - STOP if you're

  • Reverting without showing preview first
  • Skipping user confirmation
  • Not checking for uncommitted changes first
  • Reverting more than requested
  • Not updating Draft state after git revert
  • Assuming you know which commits to revert without checking

Preview and confirm before any destructive action.


Step 0: Pre-flight Check

  1. Verify Draft context exists:

    ls draft/tracks.md 2>/dev/null

    If draft/ does not exist: STOP — "No Draft context found. Run /draft:init first."

  2. Check working tree: Run git status --porcelain. If output is non-empty, warn the user about uncommitted changes and suggest stashing or committing first. Do NOT proceed until working tree is clean.

Step 1: Analyze What to Revert

Ask user what level to revert:

  1. Task - Revert a single task's commits
  2. Phase - Revert all commits in a phase
  3. Track - Revert entire track's commits

If user specifies by name/description, find the matching commits.

Step 2: Find Related Commits

Primary method: Read plan.md — every completed task has its commit SHA recorded inline. Use these SHAs directly.

If no commits found (all tasks are [ ] Pending with no SHAs): announce "No commits found for this scope — nothing to revert." and STOP.

Fallback method (if SHAs missing but completed tasks exist): Search git log by track ID pattern:

For Draft-managed work, commits follow pattern:

  • feat(<track_id>): <description>
  • fix(<track_id>): <description>
  • test(<track_id>): <description>
  • refactor(<track_id>): <description>
# Find commits for a track
git log --oneline --grep="<track_id>"

# Find commits in date range (for phase)
git log --oneline --since="<phase_start>" --until="<phase_end>" --grep="<track_id>"

Cross-reference: Verify SHAs from plan.md match the git log results. Git log is always authoritative for commit identification. plan.md is authoritative for task-to-commit mapping. On SHA mismatch, prefer git log and warn the user.

Step 3: Preview Revert

Show user what will be reverted:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
                    REVERT PREVIEW
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Reverting: [Task/Phase/Track] "[name]"

Commits to revert (newest first):
  abc1234 feat(add-auth): Add JWT validation
  def5678 feat(add-auth): Create auth middleware
  ghi9012 test(add-auth): Add auth middleware tests

Files affected:
  src/auth/middleware.ts
  src/auth/jwt.ts
  tests/auth/middleware.test.ts

Plan.md changes:
  Task 2.1: [x] (abc1234) → [ ]
  Task 2.2: [x] (def5678) → [ ]

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Proceed with revert? (yes/no)

Step 4: Execute Revert

If confirmed:

Maintain a list of successfully reverted commits during execution.

Read draft/workflow.md → ## Toolchain section for VCS CLI. See core/shared/vcs-commands.md for the full command mapping.

git mode:

# Revert each commit in reverse order (newest first)
git revert --no-commit <commit1>
git revert --no-commit <commit2>
# ... continue for all commits

# Create single revert commit
git commit -m "revert(<track_id>): Revert [task/phase description]"

On conflict, report: "Successfully reverted: [list]. Conflict on: [sha]. Run git revert --abort to undo partial state."

Step 5: Update Draft State

  1. Update plan.md:
    • Change reverted tasks from [x] to [ ]
    • Remove the commit SHA from the reverted task line
    • Add revert note
  2. Update metadata.json:
    • Decrement tasks.completed
    • Decrement phases.completed if applicable
    • Update timestamp
    • Note: metadata.json only stores phases.total (int) and phases.completed (int). Decrement phases.completed if all tasks in a previously completed phase are reverted. Phase status markers ([~], [x], [ ]) are tracked in plan.md text, not in metadata.json. Update plan.md phase headings accordingly: if any task in a completed phase is reverted, mark that phase [~] In Progress in plan.md; if ALL tasks are reverted, mark it [ ] Pending in plan.md.
  3. Update draft/tracks.md if track status changed
  4. Stale reports: After revert, existing review-report-latest.md and bughunt-report-latest.md for the track are stale. Resolve symlink targets first: readlink -f review-report-latest.md and readlink -f bughunt-report-latest.md. Add a warning header to the symlink targets (the actual timestamped files): > **WARNING: This report predates a revert operation and may be stale. Re-run the review/bughunt.** Or delete them if the revert is substantial.

Step 6: Confirm

Revert complete

Reverted:
  - [list of tasks/commits]

Updated:
  - draft/tracks/<track_id>/plan.md
  - draft/tracks/<track_id>/metadata.json

Git status:
  - Created revert commit: [sha]

The reverted tasks are now available to re-implement.
Run /draft:implement to continue.

Recovery

If the process is interrupted between git revert and Draft state update, the recovery procedure is: check git log for the revert commit, then manually update plan.md task statuses to match the reverted state.


Abort Handling

If user says no to preview:

Revert cancelled. No changes made.

If git revert has conflicts:

Revert conflict detected in: [files]

Options:
1. Resolve conflicts manually, then run: git revert --continue
2. Abort revert: git revert --abort

Draft state NOT updated (pending revert completion).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.