agentleFS
drafthqdrafthq/draft/skills/deploy-checklist/SKILL.md

deploy-checklist

Skill40 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Pre-deployment verification checklist. Generates customized checklists based on tech-stack with rollback triggers. Auto-invoked by /draft:upload.

14 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use tdd and grill-me.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • GoogleSkill

    tdd

    Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    grill-me

    A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

23 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 15 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 15

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When draft/graph/schema.yaml exists, this skill must follow the graph-first lookup contract in core/shared/graph-query.md §Mandatory Lookup …

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/cycle-detect.sh" --repo .

    line 15
  3. Very specific:

    Run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/hotspot-rank.sh" --repo .

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    Before starting, capture the current git state:

    line 40
  5. Very specific:

    If draft/ doesn't exist, this skill can still run standalone — generate a generic checklist.

    line 55
  6. Very specific:

    Read and follow the base procedure in core/shared/draft-context-loading.md.

    line 59
  7. Very specific:

    After the chain runs, write the result into metadata.json:pre_deploy_status (passing / failing / bypassed).

    line 84
  8. Very specific:

    If a track is active: read draft/tracks/<id>/spec.md and plan.md for change scope.

    line 96
  9. Very specific:

    Read draft/tech-stack.md — Identify deployment-relevant tech:

    line 100
  10. Very specific:

    Read draft/workflow.md — Deployment conventions, toolchain (git)

    line 106
  11. Very specific:

    Read draft/.ai-context.md — Service topology, dependencies

    line 107
  12. Very specific:

    If track-scoped: Read draft/tracks/<id>/hld.md and lld.md if present — these are the source of truth for HLD §Checklist (Performance, …

    line 108
  13. Very specific:

    If a partial file is needed for tracking, write it with status: BLOCKED in the frontmatter and _latest symlinks must NOT be updated — …

    line 136
  14. Distinctive:

    Verify previous version is serving traffic

    line 193
  15. Distinctive:

    If unchecked and user wants to proceed: warn "Critical item unchecked: [item].

    line 202
  16. Distinctive:

    Default: stop and address critical items

    line 203
  17. Distinctive:

    Check off items as they complete them

    line 207
  18. Distinctive:

    Add custom items specific to this deployment

    line 208
  19. Very specific:

    MANDATORY: Include YAML frontmatter with git metadata: Follow core/shared/git-report-metadata.md.

    line 213
  20. Distinctive:

    Before saving the checklist file, internally verify and report:

    line 239
  21. Very specific:

    If draft/graph/schema.yaml does not exist, set Graph files queried: NONE and use justification graph data unavailable.

    line 245
  22. Very specific:

    Jira sync: If ticket linked, attach checklist and post comment via core/shared/jira-sync.md

    line 255
  23. Distinctive:

    If no workflow.md: Use sensible defaults, recommend documenting deployment conventions

    line 262

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Deploy Checklist

You are generating a pre-deployment verification checklist customized to this project's technology stack.

MANDATORY GRAPH LOOKUP (read before Phase 1)

When draft/graph/schema.yaml exists, this skill must follow the graph-first lookup contract in core/shared/graph-query.md §Mandatory Lookup Contract. Use the graph to validate module boundaries before the deploy:

  1. For each file in the deploy diff, run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/graph-impact.sh" --repo . --file <path> to enumerate the modules affected — flag any module not declared in hld.md §Detailed Design as a deployment-scope miss.
  2. Run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/cycle-detect.sh" --repo . (and query "$DRAFT_TOOLS/graph-arch.sh" --repo . for the module overview) to ensure no fresh cycles were introduced after HLD sign-off.
  3. Run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/hotspot-rank.sh" --repo . — any hotspot in the diff escalates the Resiliency row of Phase 0.

Filesystem grep is reserved for source-text scans (migration file names, flag-key strings). Module/impact discovery goes through the graph.

Red Flags — STOP if you're

See shared red flags — applies to all code-touching skills.

Skill-specific:

  • Deploying without a rollback plan
  • Skipping database migration verification
  • Deploying on Friday without explicit team approval
  • Pushing to production without monitoring in place
  • Ignoring failed checklist items marked as critical

Every deployment needs a rollback plan. No exceptions.


Pre-Check

0. Capture Git Context

Before starting, capture the current git state:

git branch --show-current # Current branch name
git rev-parse --short HEAD # Current commit hash

Store this for the checklist header. The checklist is scoped to this specific branch/commit.

1. Verify Draft Context

ls draft/ 2>/dev/null

If draft/ doesn't exist, this skill can still run standalone — generate a generic checklist.

2. Load Draft Context (if available)

Read and follow the base procedure in core/shared/draft-context-loading.md.

3. Run validator gate chain (WS-9)

Canonical chain documented in core/shared/verification-gates.md. A single non-zero exit aborts the checklist and the output groups defects by validator.

TRACK_DIR="$1" # absolute path to track-under-deploy, or .

DRAFT_TOOLS="${DRAFT_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat ~/.cache/draft/plugin-root 2>/dev/null)}/scripts/tools"
[ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/cache/*/draft/*/scripts/tools 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)"
[ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/*draft*/scripts/tools 2>/dev/null | tail -1)"
[ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$PWD/scripts/tools"

"$DRAFT_TOOLS/check-track-hygiene.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/verify-citations.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/verify-doc-anchors.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/check-graph-usage-report.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/check-scope-conflicts.sh" "$TRACK_DIR/.." || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/diff-templates-vs-tracks.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?

After the chain runs, write the result into metadata.json:pre_deploy_status (passing / failing / bypassed). The downstream checklist sections must not be considered "ready to deploy" if pre_deploy_status != passing.

Step 1: Parse Arguments

Check for arguments:

  • /draft:deploy-checklist — Interactive: detect active track or ask for service name
  • /draft:deploy-checklist <service> — Generate checklist for named service
  • /draft:deploy-checklist track <id> — Generate from track's change scope

If a track is active: read draft/tracks/<id>/spec.md and plan.md for change scope.

Step 2: Load Context

  1. Read draft/tech-stack.md — Identify deployment-relevant tech:
    • Database type (migrations needed?)
    • Container orchestration (K8s, Docker Compose?)
    • CI/CD pipeline details
    • Feature flag system
    • Monitoring/alerting stack
  2. Read draft/workflow.md — Deployment conventions, toolchain (git)
  3. Read draft/.ai-context.md — Service topology, dependencies
  4. If track-scoped: Read draft/tracks/<id>/hld.md and lld.md if present — these are the source of truth for HLD §Checklist (Performance, Scale, Security, Resiliency, Multi-tenancy, Upgrade, Cost, Flags), §Deployment, §Observability, and LLD §Alerting Thresholds. The deploy checklist validates they are populated.

Step 3: Generate Checklist

Generate a four-phase checklist customized to the project's tech stack. Adapt items based on what the project actually uses — omit irrelevant items (e.g., skip database items if there is no database) and add project-specific items discovered in context.

Phase 0: HLD/LLD Gate (track-scoped only, when hld.md exists)

blocker: the HLD's §Checklist sections were the design-time commitment. If they are still empty at deploy time, the design was never validated against operational reality. This phase enforces that.

For criticality ∈ {high, mission-critical} (read from hld.md frontmatter classification.criticality), every row below MUST be checked before Phase 1 begins. For standard criticality, missing rows produce warnings but do not block. For low, this phase is informational.

  • HLD §Performance populated — QPS and p95 latency stated
  • HLD §Scale populated — horizontal scaling story documented; bottlenecks named
  • HLD §Security populated — credentials, RBAC, encryption answered
  • HLD §Resiliency populated — failure modes and graceful degradation described
  • HLD §Multi-tenancy populated — isolation, predictable performance, migration covered
  • HLD §Upgrade populated — backward compat, dependent service order, blast radius
  • HLD §Flags and Controlled Rollout populated — flag names, kill switches
  • HLD §Cost Implications populated — Cloud cost calculation included for SaaS deployments
  • HLD §Deployment populated — DP/CP platform call answered (on-prem / SaaS / Cloud Console / IBM cloud)
  • HLD §Observability populated — key metrics named with thresholds
  • HLD §Approvals table signed by Technical Leads and Architecture Review Board (and Cloud Operations if SaaS, QA if on-prem) — Date column populated
  • LLD §Alerting Thresholds table populated (when lld.md exists) — every metric has Threshold, Severity, Action

If any blocker row is empty for high/mission-critical: STOP. Do not generate Phases 1–3, do not run Step 5 (Save Output), and do not create the deploy-checklist.md file. Tell the developer: "HLD/LLD §[section] is empty for a [criticality] track. Fill it in hld.md / lld.md before deploy. Run /draft:decompose to refresh structural sections; author-driven sections must be filled manually."

If a partial file is needed for tracking, write it with status: BLOCKED in the frontmatter and _latest symlinks must NOT be updated — /draft:upload Step 2.5 detects status: BLOCKED and refuses to treat the file as a passing checklist.

Phase 1: Pre-Deploy

  • Tests: All tests passing in CI
  • Review: Code reviewed and approved
  • Migrations: Database migrations tested on staging (if applicable)
  • Migration Rollback: Down-migration verified (if applicable)
  • Feature Flags: New features behind flags (if applicable)
  • Config: Environment variables and secrets verified for target environment
  • Dependencies: No known vulnerable dependencies (npm audit / pip audit / equivalent)
  • Monitoring: Alerting rules configured for new endpoints/services
  • Rollback Plan: Documented and tested (see Rollback Triggers below)
  • Communication: Team notified of deployment window
  • Backup: Database backup taken (if schema changes)
  • Changelog: Release notes or changelog updated
  • API Compatibility: Breaking changes documented and consumers notified

Phase 2: Deploy

  • Method: [Canary / Blue-Green / Rolling / Direct] — specify strategy
  • Sequence: Deploy order for multi-service changes documented
  • Monitoring Dashboard: [URL] open during deployment
  • Smoke Tests: Ready to run post-deploy
  • Rollback Command: [specific rollback command] ready to execute
  • Health Checks: Endpoints responding before traffic shift
  • Traffic Shift: Gradual rollout percentage plan (if canary/blue-green)
  • Deployment Log: Recording start time and each step completion

Phase 3: Post-Deploy

  • Smoke Tests: All passing
  • Error Rate: Below threshold ([X]% — from baseline)
  • Latency: Below threshold ([X]ms — p95 from baseline)
  • Logs: No unexpected errors in first 15 minutes
  • Feature Verification: New features working as expected
  • Data Integrity: No data corruption indicators
  • Dependency Health: Downstream services unaffected
  • Cleanup: Feature flags toggled, old code paths removed (if applicable)
  • Documentation: Runbook updated if operational procedures changed
  • Notification: Team notified of successful deployment

Rollback Triggers

Initiate rollback if ANY of these occur:

  • Error rate exceeds 2x baseline
  • p95 latency exceeds 3x baseline
  • Data corruption detected
  • Critical user-facing functionality broken
  • Deployment stuck in partial state for >10 minutes
  • Health check failures on >10% of instances
  • Memory or CPU exceeding safe thresholds on deployed instances

Rollback Procedure

  1. Execute rollback command (documented in Phase 2)
  2. Verify previous version is serving traffic
  3. Confirm error rates return to baseline
  4. Investigate root cause before re-attempting deployment
  5. Post-mortem if rollback was triggered by data corruption or user impact

Step 4: Present and Track

Present the checklist interactively. For each critical item (marked bold):

  • If unchecked and user wants to proceed: warn "Critical item unchecked: [item]. Are you sure? [y/N]"
  • Default: stop and address critical items

Allow the user to:

  • Check off items as they complete them
  • Add custom items specific to this deployment
  • Mark items as N/A with justification

Step 5: Save Output

MANDATORY: Include YAML frontmatter with git metadata. Follow core/shared/git-report-metadata.md.

Include the report header table immediately after frontmatter:

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Branch** | `{LOCAL_BRANCH}` → `{REMOTE/BRANCH}` |
| **Commit** | `{SHORT_SHA}` — {COMMIT_MESSAGE} |
| **Generated** | {ISO_TIMESTAMP} |
| **Synced To** | `{FULL_SHA}` |

Save to:

  • Track-scoped: draft/tracks/<id>/deploy-checklist.md
  • Standalone: draft/deploy-checklist-<timestamp>.md with symlink deploy-checklist-latest.md
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y-%m-%dT%H%M)
# Example: draft/deploy-checklist-2026-03-15T1430.md
ln -sf deploy-checklist-${TIMESTAMP}.md draft/deploy-checklist-latest.md

Mandatory Self-Check (before saving the checklist)

Before saving the checklist file, internally verify and report:

  1. Graph files queried — JSONL files loaded plus any live graph query-tool invocations (impact, cycles, modules).
  2. Layer 1 files deliberately skipped — list any context sections skipped.
  3. Filesystem grep fallback justification — for every grep/find run, name the concept it searched for.

If draft/graph/schema.yaml does not exist, set Graph files queried: NONE and use justification graph data unavailable.

Graph Usage Report (append to checklist)

Emit the canonical footer from core/shared/graph-usage-report.md. The lint hook scripts/tools/check-graph-usage-report.sh validates the section on save.

Cross-Skill Dispatch

  • Auto-invoked by: /draft:upload (pre-upload verification)
  • References: core/agents/ops.md for production-safety mindset
  • Jira sync: If ticket linked, attach checklist and post comment via core/shared/jira-sync.md
  • MCP: GitHub MCP for change details, Jira MCP for ticket context

Error Handling

If no tech-stack.md: Generate generic checklist with all items, note: "Customize after running /draft:init" If no active track: Generate standalone checklist, ask which service/release If no workflow.md: Use sensible defaults, recommend documenting deployment conventions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.