deploy-checklist
Skill40 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-deployment verification checklist. Generates customized checklists based on tech-stack with rollback triggers. Auto-invoked by /draft:upload.
14 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- anotherben/claude-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kitloomlk-stack/devops-cloud-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- jazzpujols34/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- johanolofsson72/Claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use tdd and grill-me.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter★ 145same name
- anotherben/claude-harness★ 7same name
- viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit★ 7same name
- wchen02/cursor-agent-learning★ 3same name
- johanolofsson72/Claude★ 2same name
- lodetomasi/claude-code-training-lab★ 2same name
- nisarth/claude-skills-store★ 1same name
- Avinava/agentic-react-express-ts★ 0same name
- IcodeNet/agent-skills★ 0same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- web/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- web/llms.txtllms.txt
- adrSkill
- assist-reviewSkill
- bughuntSkill
- changeSkill
- coverageSkill
- debugSkill
- decomposeSkill
- deep-reviewSkill
- discoverSkill
- docsSkill
- documentationSkill
- draftSkill
- graphSkill
- impactSkill
- implementSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- initSkill
- integrationsSkill
- jiraSkill
- learnSkill
- new-trackSkill
- opsSkill
- planSkill
- quick-reviewSkill
- revertSkill
- reviewSkill
- standupSkill
- statusSkill
- tech-debtSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- tourSkill
- uploadSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 15 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
15
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
When draft/graph/schema.yaml exists, this skill must follow the graph-first lookup contract in core/shared/graph-query.md §Mandatory Lookup …
- Very specific: line 15
Run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/cycle-detect.sh" --repo .
- Very specific: line 16
Run "$DRAFT_TOOLS/hotspot-rank.sh" --repo .
- Distinctive: line 40
Before starting, capture the current git state:
- Very specific: line 55
If draft/ doesn't exist, this skill can still run standalone — generate a generic checklist.
- Very specific: line 59
Read and follow the base procedure in core/shared/draft-context-loading.md.
- Very specific: line 84
After the chain runs, write the result into metadata.json:pre_deploy_status (passing / failing / bypassed).
- Very specific: line 96
If a track is active: read draft/tracks/<id>/spec.md and plan.md for change scope.
- Very specific: line 100
Read draft/tech-stack.md — Identify deployment-relevant tech:
- Very specific: line 106
Read draft/workflow.md — Deployment conventions, toolchain (git)
- Very specific: line 107
Read draft/.ai-context.md — Service topology, dependencies
- Very specific: line 108
If track-scoped: Read draft/tracks/<id>/hld.md and lld.md if present — these are the source of truth for HLD §Checklist (Performance, …
- Very specific: line 136
If a partial file is needed for tracking, write it with status: BLOCKED in the frontmatter and _latest symlinks must NOT be updated — …
- Distinctive: line 193
Verify previous version is serving traffic
- Distinctive: line 202
If unchecked and user wants to proceed: warn "Critical item unchecked: [item].
- Distinctive: line 203
Default: stop and address critical items
- Distinctive: line 207
Check off items as they complete them
- Distinctive: line 208
Add custom items specific to this deployment
- Very specific: line 213
MANDATORY: Include YAML frontmatter with git metadata: Follow core/shared/git-report-metadata.md.
- Distinctive: line 239
Before saving the checklist file, internally verify and report:
- Very specific: line 245
If draft/graph/schema.yaml does not exist, set Graph files queried: NONE and use justification graph data unavailable.
- Very specific: line 255
Jira sync: If ticket linked, attach checklist and post comment via core/shared/jira-sync.md
- Distinctive: line 262
If no workflow.md: Use sensible defaults, recommend documenting deployment conventions
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deploy Checklist
You are generating a pre-deployment verification checklist customized to this project's technology stack.
MANDATORY GRAPH LOOKUP (read before Phase 1)
When draft/graph/schema.yaml exists, this skill must follow the graph-first lookup contract in core/shared/graph-query.md §Mandatory Lookup Contract. Use the graph to validate module boundaries before the deploy:
- For each file in the deploy diff, run
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/graph-impact.sh" --repo . --file <path>to enumerate the modules affected — flag any module not declared inhld.md§Detailed Design as a deployment-scope miss. - Run
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/cycle-detect.sh" --repo .(and query"$DRAFT_TOOLS/graph-arch.sh" --repo .for the module overview) to ensure no fresh cycles were introduced after HLD sign-off. - Run
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/hotspot-rank.sh" --repo .— any hotspot in the diff escalates the Resiliency row of Phase 0.
Filesystem grep is reserved for source-text scans (migration file names, flag-key strings). Module/impact discovery goes through the graph.
Red Flags — STOP if you're
See shared red flags — applies to all code-touching skills.
Skill-specific:
- Deploying without a rollback plan
- Skipping database migration verification
- Deploying on Friday without explicit team approval
- Pushing to production without monitoring in place
- Ignoring failed checklist items marked as critical
Every deployment needs a rollback plan. No exceptions.
Pre-Check
0. Capture Git Context
Before starting, capture the current git state:
git branch --show-current # Current branch name
git rev-parse --short HEAD # Current commit hashStore this for the checklist header. The checklist is scoped to this specific branch/commit.
1. Verify Draft Context
ls draft/ 2>/dev/nullIf draft/ doesn't exist, this skill can still run standalone — generate a generic checklist.
2. Load Draft Context (if available)
Read and follow the base procedure in core/shared/draft-context-loading.md.
3. Run validator gate chain (WS-9)
Canonical chain documented in core/shared/verification-gates.md. A single non-zero exit aborts the checklist and the output groups defects by validator.
TRACK_DIR="$1" # absolute path to track-under-deploy, or .
DRAFT_TOOLS="${DRAFT_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat ~/.cache/draft/plugin-root 2>/dev/null)}/scripts/tools"
[ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/cache/*/draft/*/scripts/tools 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)"
[ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/*draft*/scripts/tools 2>/dev/null | tail -1)"
[ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$PWD/scripts/tools"
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/check-track-hygiene.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/verify-citations.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/verify-doc-anchors.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/check-graph-usage-report.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/check-scope-conflicts.sh" "$TRACK_DIR/.." || rc=$?
"$DRAFT_TOOLS/diff-templates-vs-tracks.sh" "$TRACK_DIR" || rc=$?After the chain runs, write the result into metadata.json:pre_deploy_status
(passing / failing / bypassed). The downstream checklist sections must
not be considered "ready to deploy" if pre_deploy_status != passing.
Step 1: Parse Arguments
Check for arguments:
/draft:deploy-checklist— Interactive: detect active track or ask for service name/draft:deploy-checklist <service>— Generate checklist for named service/draft:deploy-checklist track <id>— Generate from track's change scope
If a track is active: read draft/tracks/<id>/spec.md and plan.md for change scope.
Step 2: Load Context
- Read
draft/tech-stack.md— Identify deployment-relevant tech:- Database type (migrations needed?)
- Container orchestration (K8s, Docker Compose?)
- CI/CD pipeline details
- Feature flag system
- Monitoring/alerting stack
- Read
draft/workflow.md— Deployment conventions, toolchain (git) - Read
draft/.ai-context.md— Service topology, dependencies - If track-scoped: Read
draft/tracks/<id>/hld.mdandlld.mdif present — these are the source of truth for HLD §Checklist (Performance, Scale, Security, Resiliency, Multi-tenancy, Upgrade, Cost, Flags), §Deployment, §Observability, and LLD §Alerting Thresholds. The deploy checklist validates they are populated.
Step 3: Generate Checklist
Generate a four-phase checklist customized to the project's tech stack. Adapt items based on what the project actually uses — omit irrelevant items (e.g., skip database items if there is no database) and add project-specific items discovered in context.
Phase 0: HLD/LLD Gate (track-scoped only, when hld.md exists)
blocker: the HLD's §Checklist sections were the design-time commitment. If they are still empty at deploy time, the design was never validated against operational reality. This phase enforces that.
For criticality ∈ {high, mission-critical} (read from hld.md frontmatter classification.criticality), every row below MUST be checked before Phase 1 begins. For standard criticality, missing rows produce warnings but do not block. For low, this phase is informational.
- HLD §Performance populated — QPS and p95 latency stated
- HLD §Scale populated — horizontal scaling story documented; bottlenecks named
- HLD §Security populated — credentials, RBAC, encryption answered
- HLD §Resiliency populated — failure modes and graceful degradation described
- HLD §Multi-tenancy populated — isolation, predictable performance, migration covered
- HLD §Upgrade populated — backward compat, dependent service order, blast radius
- HLD §Flags and Controlled Rollout populated — flag names, kill switches
- HLD §Cost Implications populated — Cloud cost calculation included for SaaS deployments
- HLD §Deployment populated — DP/CP platform call answered (on-prem / SaaS / Cloud Console / IBM cloud)
- HLD §Observability populated — key metrics named with thresholds
- HLD §Approvals table signed by Technical Leads and Architecture Review Board (and Cloud Operations if SaaS, QA if on-prem) — Date column populated
- LLD §Alerting Thresholds table populated (when
lld.mdexists) — every metric has Threshold, Severity, Action
If any blocker row is empty for high/mission-critical: STOP. Do not generate Phases 1–3, do not run Step 5 (Save Output), and do not create the deploy-checklist.md file. Tell the developer: "HLD/LLD §[section] is empty for a [criticality] track. Fill it in hld.md / lld.md before deploy. Run /draft:decompose to refresh structural sections; author-driven sections must be filled manually."
If a partial file is needed for tracking, write it with status: BLOCKED in the frontmatter and _latest symlinks must NOT be updated — /draft:upload Step 2.5 detects status: BLOCKED and refuses to treat the file as a passing checklist.
Phase 1: Pre-Deploy
- Tests: All tests passing in CI
- Review: Code reviewed and approved
- Migrations: Database migrations tested on staging (if applicable)
- Migration Rollback: Down-migration verified (if applicable)
- Feature Flags: New features behind flags (if applicable)
- Config: Environment variables and secrets verified for target environment
- Dependencies: No known vulnerable dependencies (
npm audit/pip audit/ equivalent) - Monitoring: Alerting rules configured for new endpoints/services
- Rollback Plan: Documented and tested (see Rollback Triggers below)
- Communication: Team notified of deployment window
- Backup: Database backup taken (if schema changes)
- Changelog: Release notes or changelog updated
- API Compatibility: Breaking changes documented and consumers notified
Phase 2: Deploy
- Method: [Canary / Blue-Green / Rolling / Direct] — specify strategy
- Sequence: Deploy order for multi-service changes documented
- Monitoring Dashboard: [URL] open during deployment
- Smoke Tests: Ready to run post-deploy
- Rollback Command:
[specific rollback command]ready to execute - Health Checks: Endpoints responding before traffic shift
- Traffic Shift: Gradual rollout percentage plan (if canary/blue-green)
- Deployment Log: Recording start time and each step completion
Phase 3: Post-Deploy
- Smoke Tests: All passing
- Error Rate: Below threshold ([X]% — from baseline)
- Latency: Below threshold ([X]ms — p95 from baseline)
- Logs: No unexpected errors in first 15 minutes
- Feature Verification: New features working as expected
- Data Integrity: No data corruption indicators
- Dependency Health: Downstream services unaffected
- Cleanup: Feature flags toggled, old code paths removed (if applicable)
- Documentation: Runbook updated if operational procedures changed
- Notification: Team notified of successful deployment
Rollback Triggers
Initiate rollback if ANY of these occur:
- Error rate exceeds 2x baseline
- p95 latency exceeds 3x baseline
- Data corruption detected
- Critical user-facing functionality broken
- Deployment stuck in partial state for >10 minutes
- Health check failures on >10% of instances
- Memory or CPU exceeding safe thresholds on deployed instances
Rollback Procedure
- Execute rollback command (documented in Phase 2)
- Verify previous version is serving traffic
- Confirm error rates return to baseline
- Investigate root cause before re-attempting deployment
- Post-mortem if rollback was triggered by data corruption or user impact
Step 4: Present and Track
Present the checklist interactively. For each critical item (marked bold):
- If unchecked and user wants to proceed: warn "Critical item unchecked: [item]. Are you sure? [y/N]"
- Default: stop and address critical items
Allow the user to:
- Check off items as they complete them
- Add custom items specific to this deployment
- Mark items as N/A with justification
Step 5: Save Output
MANDATORY: Include YAML frontmatter with git metadata. Follow core/shared/git-report-metadata.md.
Include the report header table immediately after frontmatter:
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Branch** | `{LOCAL_BRANCH}` → `{REMOTE/BRANCH}` |
| **Commit** | `{SHORT_SHA}` — {COMMIT_MESSAGE} |
| **Generated** | {ISO_TIMESTAMP} |
| **Synced To** | `{FULL_SHA}` |Save to:
- Track-scoped:
draft/tracks/<id>/deploy-checklist.md - Standalone:
draft/deploy-checklist-<timestamp>.mdwith symlinkdeploy-checklist-latest.md
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y-%m-%dT%H%M)
# Example: draft/deploy-checklist-2026-03-15T1430.md
ln -sf deploy-checklist-${TIMESTAMP}.md draft/deploy-checklist-latest.mdMandatory Self-Check (before saving the checklist)
Before saving the checklist file, internally verify and report:
- Graph files queried — JSONL files loaded plus any live graph query-tool invocations (
impact,cycles,modules). - Layer 1 files deliberately skipped — list any context sections skipped.
- Filesystem grep fallback justification — for every
grep/findrun, name the concept it searched for.
If draft/graph/schema.yaml does not exist, set Graph files queried: NONE and use justification graph data unavailable.
Graph Usage Report (append to checklist)
Emit the canonical footer from core/shared/graph-usage-report.md. The lint hook scripts/tools/check-graph-usage-report.sh validates the section on save.
Cross-Skill Dispatch
- Auto-invoked by:
/draft:upload(pre-upload verification) - References:
core/agents/ops.mdfor production-safety mindset - Jira sync: If ticket linked, attach checklist and post comment via
core/shared/jira-sync.md - MCP: GitHub MCP for change details, Jira MCP for ticket context
Error Handling
If no tech-stack.md: Generate generic checklist with all items, note: "Customize after running /draft:init"
If no active track: Generate standalone checklist, ask which service/release
If no workflow.md: Use sensible defaults, recommend documenting deployment conventions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

