jira
Skill40 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Unified Jira entry point. Routes to preview (default), create, or review subcommands.
62 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HAOYI99/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sergeiwallace/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- icarloscornejo/doertheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use confluence, meet and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SpillwaveSolutionsSkillconfluence
Manage Confluence documentation with downloads, uploads, conversions, and diagrams. Use when asked to "download Confluence pages", "upload to Confluence", "convert Wiki Markup", "sync markdown to Confluence", "create Confluence page", or "handle Confluence images".
Also in 9 projects that use this
kv0906Skillmeet
Process meeting notes into structured notes with extracted decisions, blockers, and action items. Use for "/meet project type title" then paste notes.
Also in 3 projects that use this
er1chuSkillmonday
Full Monday morning setup. Creates week folder, pulls carry-forward, and generates briefing in one pass. Use on Monday mornings or when the user says "monday", "start my week", or "monday morning".
Also in 3 projects that use this
refly-aiSkillhubspot
Integrate with HubSpot for CRM management. Use when you need to: (1) manage contacts and deals, (2) track sales pipelines, or (3) automate marketing and CRM workflows.
Also in 4 projects that use this
koderoverSkilljenkins
Jenkins CI/CD 操作。用于:(1) 触发 Jenkins 任务构建 (2) 查询任务状态和构建历史 (3) 获取构建日志 (4) 操作 Jenkins 节点和配置
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkilldatadog
Query live Datadog telemetry (logs, metrics, traces, spans, monitors, incidents, dashboards, services, hosts) through Datadog's Pup CLI. Use when users ask to investigate production behavior in Datadog, including searching logs, checking monitor status, inspecting traces or spans, looking up incidents, finding services, or correlating metrics. Do not use it for Sentry issues, repository/source-code work, or ticketing.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions62 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 62
- oracle/graalpython★ 1.7ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- SonarSource/SonarJS★ 1.3ksame name
- mongodb/docs★ 779same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192same name
- magnus919/agent-skills★ 172same name
- kv0906/pm-kit★ 138same name
- oprogramadorreal/optimus-claude★ 75same name
- grandcamel/JIRA-Assistant-Skills★ 47same name
52 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- web/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- web/llms.txtllms.txt
- adrSkill
- assist-reviewSkill
- bughuntSkill
- changeSkill
- coverageSkill
- debugSkill
- decomposeSkill
- deep-reviewSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- discoverSkill
- docsSkill
- documentationSkill
- draftSkill
- graphSkill
- impactSkill
- implementSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- initSkill
- integrationsSkill
- learnSkill
- new-trackSkill
- opsSkill
- planSkill
- quick-reviewSkill
- revertSkill
- reviewSkill
- standupSkill
- statusSkill
- tech-debtSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- tourSkill
- uploadSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
50 rules. 0 are common, 26 are distinctive, and 24 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 56 edited versions we read keep these.
26
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
24
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 28
All subcommands read project-level Jira configuration from draft/workflow.md under a ## Jira section:
- Distinctive: line 45
If a value is missing when needed:
- Distinctive: line 54
When writing any text that will go into Jira (descriptions, summaries, bug details):
- Very specific: line 57
Do not dump full plans, long task lists, verbose context, or Draft-internal reasoning into Jira.
- Distinctive: line 58
Use short summaries + key outcomes only.
- Distinctive: line 60
Never pollute Jira with excessive text.
- Very specific: line 70
Flag handling: Check $ARGUMENTS for --epic at the very start of this section.
- Distinctive: line 77
Not including quality findings when review/bughunt reports exist
- Distinctive: line 128
Every track becomes exactly 1 Story.
- Distinctive: line 129
All phases and their tasks are included inside the Story description (as markdown sections).
- Distinctive: line 130
No child Jira issues are created.
- Very specific: line 136
Use /draft:jira preview --epic or /draft:jira create --epic when you want an Epic.
- Distinctive: line 143
All detailed tasks remain inside the Story descriptions — we never create Jira Tasks or Sub-tasks.
- Very specific: line 156
Read the track's plan.md for phases and tasks.
- Very specific: line 157
Read the track's metadata.json for title and type.
- Very specific: line 158
Read the track's spec.md for root-issue description.
- Distinctive: line 159
Check for quality reports:
- Very specific: line 162
Read draft/workflow.md → ## Jira section for shared config (see Jira Configuration above).
- Very specific: line 164
If no track found: tell the user "No track found.
- Very specific: line 170
If EPIC_MODE=true (from --epic flag), use Epic + Stories mode.
- Very specific: line 214
If review-report-latest.md or bughunt-report-latest.md exists in the track directory:
- Distinctive: line 228
Critical/High findings: should be highlighted — consider suggesting additional stories or tasks to address them before the track is …
- Very specific: line 238
Create the file and the latest symlink.
- Very specific: line 242
Use the standard YAML frontmatter.
- Very specific: line 243
Add a mode: default or mode: epic field.
- Distinctive: line 245
Write a clean summary table.
- Distinctive: line 249
Jira Content Rule: Keep the description minimal and focused.
- Distinctive: line 275
Jira Content Rule: Keep every Story description short and scannable.
- Very specific: line 285
Use the existing high-quality bug export format from bughunt-report-latest.md.
- Distinctive: line 290
Add at the top:
- Very specific: line 336
Use plan.md overview for root-issue description.
- Distinctive: line 341
Check if the target file has been manually modified (user-added content not matching generated patterns — edited descriptions, added rows, …
- Distinctive: line 342
If modifications detected, prompt: "Existing jira-export appears to have manual edits.
- Distinctive: line 343
If unmodified, proceed with regeneration (new timestamped file + updated symlink).
- Distinctive: line 347
Create mid-level issue with 1 story point.
- Distinctive: line 348
Add note: "No leaf issues defined for this phase."
- Very specific: line 354
Create Jira issues from jira-export-latest.md using MCP-Jira.
- Distinctive: line 361
Not verifying the target Jira project before creation
- Very specific: line 366
Default = 1 Story only: Use --epic when you want an Epic + 1–3 Stories.
- Very specific: line 376
If no track found: tell user "No track found.
- Very specific: line 380
If
jira-export-latest.mdexists: read and parse it (follow the symlink to the timestamped file). - Very specific: line 405
Read the mode field from frontmatter:
- Very specific: line 423
Read draft/workflow.md → ## Jira section.
- Very specific: line 434
When prompting for a missing field, append to draft/workflow.md:
- Distinctive: line 449
Before creating issues, attempt to fetch project metadata via MCP to verify the project key exists:
- Distinctive: line 456
If invalid: "Jira project '[KEY]' not found.
- Very specific: line 460
If Assignee Display Name is provided, resolve to an account ID via MCP user search (e.g., find_users(query=<display_name>)).
- Distinctive: line 466
Incremental persistence: After creating each issue, immediately update the corresponding entry in the export file with the Jira key.
- Distinctive: line 487
If mode = default: Create 1 Story.
- Distinctive: line 488
If mode = epic: Create 1 Epic, then create the 1–3 Stories (using the sections from the export file) and link them to the Epic.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 56 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Jira
Single entry point for all Jira workflows: preview Draft tracks as Jira issues, create them via MCP (default = 1 Story per track; --epic = 1 Epic + 1-3 Stories), and review any Jira ticket (epic, story, bug, sub-task) end-to-end.
Subcommand Routing
Parse $ARGUMENTS and dispatch:
| User Intent | Subcommand | Behavior |
(no args), preview, preview <track-id> | preview (default) | Generate jira-export-<timestamp>.md — one Story containing all phases/tasks |
preview --epic ... | preview --epic | Generate rich export: 1 Epic + 1–3 Stories (max) |
create, create <track-id> | create | Create 1 Story (default) via MCP |
review <JIRA_ID> | review | Full qualification review of any Jira ticket — delegates to references/review.md |
previewis the default when no subcommand is supplied.reviewrequires a Jira ID as the next argument. Validate format<PROJECT>-<NUMBER>(e.g.,ENG-446236). If numeric-only, prompt for project prefix — do NOT assume.
Jira Configuration (Shared)
All subcommands read project-level Jira configuration from draft/workflow.md under a ## Jira section:
## Jira
Project Key: <KEY>
Integration: jira-mcp
Team: <team-name>
Component: <component-name>
Swimlane: <swimlane-name>
Assignee Display Name: <assignee-name>- Project Key — required for
create. If missing, prompt and persist. - Integration — informational; defaults to
jira-mcpif absent. - Team / Component / Swimlane / Assignee Display Name — applied as defaults to every issue created by
create. Empty values are skipped (Jira ignores blank fields).
If a value is missing when needed:
- Prompt the user for it.
- Append to (or create) the
## Jirasection indraft/workflow.mdso subsequent runs reuse it.
Jira Content Hygiene (Mandatory)
When writing any text that will go into Jira (descriptions, summaries, bug details):
- Be minimal, concise, and precise.
- Do not dump full plans, long task lists, verbose context, or Draft-internal reasoning into Jira.
- Use short summaries + key outcomes only.
- Structured content (phases, tasks) may be included as compact markdown, but keep it brief.
- Never pollute Jira with excessive text.
This rule applies to both preview generation and create descriptions.
Subcommand: preview
Generate a timestamped jira-export-<timestamp>.md (with jira-export-latest.md symlink) from the active track's plan for review and editing before creating Jira issues.
Flag handling: Check $ARGUMENTS for --epic at the very start of this section. If present, set EPIC_MODE=true and remove the flag from the working arguments. This flag changes the entire output structure (see Step 2).
Red Flags — STOP if you're
- Generating a preview without an approved plan.md
- Assigning story points inconsistent with task count
- Missing sub-tasks that exist in plan.md
- Not including quality findings when review/bughunt reports exist
- Overwriting a reviewed jira-export without warning the user
Plan first, then preview. Accuracy over speed.
Standard File Metadata
The generated jira-export-<timestamp>.md MUST include the standard YAML frontmatter for traceability and sync verification.
Gathering Git Information
basename "$(pwd)" # Project name
git branch --show-current # Local branch
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{upstream} 2>/dev/null || echo "none"
git rev-parse HEAD # Full SHA
git rev-parse --short HEAD # Short SHA
git log -1 --format="%ci" # Commit date
git log -1 --format="%s" # Commit subject
git status --porcelain | head -1 # Dirty checkMetadata Template
---
project: "{PROJECT_NAME}"
module: "root"
track_id: "{TRACK_ID}"
generated_by: "draft:jira:preview"
generated_at: "{ISO_TIMESTAMP}"
git:
branch: "{LOCAL_BRANCH}"
remote: "{REMOTE/BRANCH or 'none'}"
commit: "{FULL_SHA}"
commit_short: "{SHORT_SHA}"
commit_date: "{COMMIT_DATE}"
commit_message: "{FIRST_LINE_OF_COMMIT_MESSAGE}"
dirty: {true|false}
synced_to_commit: "{FULL_SHA}"
---Mapping Structure
Default behavior (recommended)
- Every track becomes exactly 1 Story.
- All phases and their tasks are included inside the Story description (as markdown sections).
- No child Jira issues are created.
This keeps Jira clean and keeps the export focused on root issues by default.
Opt-in rich hierarchy (--epic)
Use /draft:jira preview --epic or /draft:jira create --epic when you want an Epic.
Splitting rule (simple):
- 5 or fewer phases → 1 Story under the Epic
- More than 5 phases → split across 2 or 3 Stories (maximum)
All detailed tasks remain inside the Story descriptions — we never create Jira Tasks or Sub-tasks.
Summary of mappings
| Flag | Root Issue | Child Issues | Where phases/tasks live |
| (default) | 1 Story | None | Inside the single Story description |
--epic | 1 Epic | 1–3 Stories (max) | Distributed across the Story descriptions |
Step 1: Load Context
- Capture git context (commands above).
- Find the active track from
draft/tracks.md(look for[~] In Progressor first[ ]). If a track ID is provided in$ARGUMENTS, use that instead. - Read the track's
plan.mdfor phases and tasks. - Read the track's
metadata.jsonfor title and type. - Read the track's
spec.mdfor root-issue description. - Check for quality reports:
draft/tracks/<id>/review-report-latest.md— review findings (from/draft:review)draft/tracks/<id>/bughunt-report-latest.md— defect findings
- Read
draft/workflow.md→## Jirasection for shared config (see Jira Configuration above).
If no track found: tell the user "No track found. Run /draft:new-track to create one, or specify track ID."
Step 2: Determine Export Mode, Count Phases, and Group Content
2.1 Detect Mode
- If
EPIC_MODE=true(from--epicflag), use Epic + Stories mode. - Otherwise, use default single-Story mode.
2.2 Count Phases and Decide Story Count (Epic Mode Only)
Count the number of ## Phase sections in plan.md.
Splitting guideline (when using --epic):
- Phases ≤ 5 → 1 Story under the Epic
- Phases 6–12 → 2 Stories under the Epic
- Phases > 12 → 3 Stories under the Epic (hard cap)
Store the target number of stories: TARGET_STORIES.
2.3 Group Phases (for Epic Mode)
Divide the phases as evenly as possible across TARGET_STORIES.
Example grouping (store this in memory):
- Story 1 gets phases 1..K
- Story 2 gets phases K+1..M
- Story 3 gets remaining phases
In default mode, ignore grouping — everything goes under one Story.
2.4 Build Data Structures
For every phase:
- Capture Phase name, Goal, Verification
- Collect all its tasks (with status)
Calculate total story points using the existing simple table (1-2 tasks = 1pt, 3-4=2pt, 5-6=3pt, 7+=5pt). This total goes on the root issue (or split across stories in epic mode if desired — default is to put total on the first Story).
2.5 Root Issue Data
- Summary = Track title
- Description base = content from
spec.md(first 2-3 paragraphs) + later the full structured plan - Issue Type = "Story" (default) or "Epic" (--epic)
Step 3: Extract Quality Findings (if reports exist)
If review-report-latest.md or bughunt-report-latest.md exists in the track directory:
From bughunt-report-latest.md
- Parse findings by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low).
- Extract all sections for each bug: Location, Confidence, Code Evidence, Data Flow Trace, Issue, Impact, Verification Done, Why Not a False Positive, Fix, Regression Test.
- Group by severity for the export.
From review-report-latest.md
- Parse findings from review report stages — Stage 1: Automated Validation (Architecture Conformance, Dead Code, Dependency Cycles, Security Scan, Performance), Stage 2: Spec Compliance, Stage 3: Code Quality (Architecture, Error Handling, Testing, Maintainability).
- Extract for each finding: Severity (Critical ✗ / Warning ⚠), Category, Location, Issue, Risk/Impact, Fix.
- Group by severity for the export.
Critical/High findings should be highlighted — consider suggesting additional stories or tasks to address them before the track is complete.
Step 4: Generate the Export File
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y-%m-%dT%H%M)
EXPORT_FILE="draft/tracks/<track_id>/jira-export-${TIMESTAMP}.md"
SYMLINK="draft/tracks/<track_id>/jira-export-latest.md"Create the file and the latest symlink.
4.1 Write Frontmatter + Header
Use the standard YAML frontmatter.
Add a mode: default or mode: epic field.
Write a clean summary table.
4.2 Write Root Issue Section
Jira Content Rule: Keep the description minimal and focused. Use short paragraphs. Do not dump full plans or verbose reasoning. Structured phases/tasks must be compact.
Always start with:
## Root Issue
**Summary:** [Track Title]
**Issue Type:** Story # or Epic when --epic
**Labels:** draft
**Description:**
{noformat}
[First 2-3 paragraphs from spec.md]
## PlanThen render the plan content concisely:
- In default mode: Render all phases as
### Phase X: Nameheadings, with Goal, Verification, and a compact task checklist under each. - In --epic mode: If this is the root Epic section, put a short overview only.
Include the Draft signature at the bottom of the description.
4.3 Write Story Sections (only in --epic mode)
Jira Content Rule: Keep every Story description short and scannable. Use compact headings and minimal text.
If mode: epic:
- Emit 1 to 3
## Story N: [Short Title]blocks (using the grouping decided in Step 2). - Under each Story, put the phases assigned to it as
### Phase ...+ compact task checklists. - Each Story gets its share of the total story points (or put the total on the first one — simple is fine).
4.4 Write Bug Issues Section (always)
Use the existing high-quality bug export format from bughunt-report-latest.md.
These will become real Bug issues linked to the root (Epic or the main Story).
4.5 Final Notes in the Export
Add at the top:
Default = 1 Story. Use
--epicfor 1 Epic + 1-3 Stories.
Update the symlink.
Step 5: Report
Jira Preview Generated
Track: [track_id] - [title]
Mapping: [story-rooted | epic-rooted] (phases: N)
Export: draft/tracks/<id>/jira-export-<timestamp>.md
Symlink: draft/tracks/<id>/jira-export-latest.md
Summary:
- 1 root issue ({Story | Epic})
- N mid-level issues ({Tasks | Stories})
- M leaf issues (Sub-tasks)
- P total story points
- B bugs (from bughunt-report-latest.md)
Breakdown:
- Phase 1: [name] - X pts, Y tasks
- Phase 2: [name] - X pts, Y tasks
- ...
Bugs (if bughunt-report-latest.md exists):
- X critical bugs
- Y high bugs
- Z medium/low bugs
Next steps:
1. Review and edit the export via jira-export-latest.md (adjust points, descriptions, leaf issues, bug priorities)
2. Run `/draft:jira create` to create issues in JiraError Handling (preview)
plan.md has no phases:
- Tell user: "No phases found in plan.md. Run
/draft:new-trackto generate a proper plan."
spec.md missing:
- Use
plan.mdoverview for root-issue description. - Warn: "spec.md not found, using plan overview for root-issue description."
jira-export-latest.md already exists:
- Check if the target file has been manually modified (user-added content not matching generated patterns — edited descriptions, added rows, changed story points from generated values).
- If modifications detected, prompt: "Existing jira-export appears to have manual edits. Overwrite? [y/N]"
- If unmodified, proceed with regeneration (new timestamped file + updated symlink).
Phase has no tasks:
- Create mid-level issue with 1 story point.
- Add note: "No leaf issues defined for this phase."
Subcommand: create
Create Jira issues from jira-export-latest.md using MCP-Jira. If no export file exists, auto-generates one first by running the preview subcommand.
Red Flags — STOP if you're
- Creating Jira issues without reviewing
jira-export-latest.mdfirst (run/draft:jira preview) - Proceeding when MCP-Jira is not configured
- Creating duplicate issues (check if jira-export-latest.md already has Jira keys)
- Not verifying the target Jira project before creation
- Skipping the export file update after issue creation
Preview before you create. Never create duplicates.
Default = 1 Story only. Use --epic when you want an Epic + 1–3 Stories. We never create Jira Tasks or Sub-tasks.
Step 1: Load Context
- Capture git context (commands above).
- Find the active track from
draft/tracks.md. If a track ID is provided in$ARGUMENTS, use that. - Check for
draft/tracks/<track_id>/jira-export-latest.md.
If no track found: tell user "No track found. Run /draft:new-track to create one, or specify track ID."
Step 2: Ensure Export Exists
If jira-export-latest.md exists: read and parse it (follow the symlink to the timestamped file). Proceed to Step 3.
If missing: inform user "No jira-export-latest.md found. Generating preview first..." then execute the preview subcommand. Proceed to Step 3.
Step 3: Check MCP-Jira Availability
Detect MCP-Jira tools. Known tool name variants: mcp_jira_create_issue, jira_createIssue, create_jira_issue, jira-create-issue. Use whichever is available.
If unavailable:
MCP-Jira not configured.
To create issues:
1. Configure MCP-Jira server in your settings
2. Run `/draft:jira create` again
Or manually import from:
draft/tracks/<id>/jira-export-latest.mdStop execution.
Step 4: Parse Export File (Export Format)
Read the mode field from frontmatter:
default→ expect 1 root Storyepic→ expect 1 Epic + 1–3 Stories
Root Issue(s)
- Parse the
## Root Issue(and any## Story N:sections if mode=epic). - For each Story section: Summary, Description (which now contains the phases and task checklists), story points if present.
Bug Issues
Parse the ## Bug Issues section completely (same as before). These are always created as separate Bug issues.
Important: There are no longer "Mid-Level" or "Leaf Issues" tables that become separate Jira Tasks/Sub-tasks. All work items live inside the Story description(s).
Step 4b: Resolve Jira Configuration
Read draft/workflow.md → ## Jira section. Required fields and behavior:
| Field | Required? | Behavior if missing |
| Project Key | Yes | Prompt user; append to ## Jira section |
| Integration | No | Defaults to jira-mcp |
| Team | No | Skip — not applied to issues |
| Component | No | Skip |
| Swimlane | No | Skip |
| Assignee Display Name | No | Skip |
When prompting for a missing field, append to draft/workflow.md:
## Jira
Project Key: <KEY>
Integration: jira-mcp
Team: <team-name>
Component: <component-name>
Swimlane: <swimlane-name>
Assignee Display Name: <assignee-name>Validate Project Key
Before creating issues, attempt to fetch project metadata via MCP to verify the project key exists:
MCP call: get_project (or equivalent)
- project: [project key]If invalid: "Jira project '[KEY]' not found. Verify the project key and try again." Stop execution.
Resolve Assignee
If Assignee Display Name is provided, resolve to an account ID via MCP user search (e.g., find_users(query=<display_name>)). Cache the resolved ID for the session. If resolution fails, warn and create issues unassigned rather than failing.
Step 5: Create Issues via MCP
Pin the symlink target: At the start of this step, resolve the symlink to its actual timestamped file path (e.g., via readlink -f jira-export-latest.md). Use the resolved path for all subsequent writes to prevent data loss if the symlink is updated mid-run.
Incremental persistence: After creating each issue, immediately update the corresponding entry in the export file with the Jira key. This ensures re-runs can skip already-created items even if the process fails mid-way.
Note: Some Jira configurations do not allow setting status during creation. If status setting fails, create in default status and log a warning.
Shared field defaults
Apply these to every create_issue call (omit any that resolved to empty in Step 4b):
- project: [Project Key]
- labels: ["draft"]
- component: [Component if set]
- assignee: [Resolved account ID if set]
- custom_field_swimlane: [Swimlane if set] # field ID is Jira-config specific
- custom_field_team: [Team if set] # field ID is Jira-config specificSwimlane and Team are often custom fields. If your Jira project uses different field IDs, configure your MCP server's field mapping. Unknown fields will be rejected — log the rejection and continue without them.
5a. Create Root Issue(s)
- If mode = default: Create 1 Story.
- If mode = epic: Create 1 Epic, then create the 1–3 Stories (using the sections from the export file) and link them to the Epic.
For each Story/Epic: Jira Content Rule (strict): The description sent to Jira must be concise. Use short summaries and compact structured sections only. Do not include long reasoning or exhaustive lists.
MCP call: create_issue
- issue_type: Story or Epic
- summary: ...
- description: [concise content — phases as compact sections, tasks as short checklists]
+ shared field defaultsCapture the keys.
5b. Create Bug Issues (from Bug Hunt Report)
For every bug parsed in Step 4, create a real Bug issue:
MCP call: create_issue
- issue_type: Bug
- summary: ...
- description: [full bughunt evidence]
- parent / epic_link: [link to the root Story or Epic]
- priority: [from severity]
+ shared field defaultsDetailed work lives inside the root issue description(s) by default. All detailed work lives inside the Story descriptions.
Step 6: Finalize Tracking
Export file has already been updated incrementally during Step 5. Now update plan.md with the Jira keys:
## Phase 1: Setup [PROJ-124]
...
- [x] **Task 1.1:** Extract logging utilities [PROJ-125]
- [x] **Task 1.2:** Extract security utilities [PROJ-126]Set export file status to Created (via jira-export-latest.md):
**Status:** Created
**Root Key:** PROJ-123Step 7: Report (new simplified format)
Jira Issues Created
Track: [track_id] - [title]
Project: [PROJ]
Mode: {default → 1 Story | --epic → 1 Epic + 1-3 Stories}
Created:
- {Story | Epic}: PROJ-123 - [Track title]
(All phases and tasks are inside the Story description)
Bugs (from Bug Hunt) — always created as separate issues:
- Bug: PROJ-131 - [Critical] Correctness: Off-by-one error in pagination (linked to PROJ-123)
- Bug: PROJ-132 - [High] ...
Total: 1 root issue + B bugs
Label: "draft" applied to all issues
Updated:
- plan.md (added root Jira key)
- jira-export-latest.md (marked as created)Error Handling (create)
MCP call fails:
Failed to create [issue type]: [error message]
Partial creation:
- {Story | Epic}: PROJ-123 (created)
- Mid-level 1: PROJ-124 (created)
- Leaf 1.1: PROJ-125 (created)
- Leaf 1.2: FAILED - [error]
- Mid-level 2: (skipped)
Fix the issue and run `/draft:jira create` again.
Already-created issues will be detected by keys in jira-export-latest.md.Export has existing keys: skip items that already have keys; only create items without keys. Report "Skipped Mid-level 1 (already exists: PROJ-124)". Still create leaves if mid-level exists but leaves don't have keys.
Project not configured: see Step 4b.
plan.md phases don't match export: warn "Export has N mid-level issues but plan has M phases. Proceeding with export structure." Create based on export.
Subcommand: review
See review.md for the full epic/story/bug/sub-task qualification pipeline. The router delegates to that file when the user invokes /draft:jira review <JIRA_ID>.
The review subcommand:
- Accepts any Jira issue ID (epic, story, bug, sub-task) and adapts its depth to the issue type.
- Runs a 7-phase pipeline: prerequisites → epic/story collection → document/test-plan synthesis → code change collection (Gerrit/GitHub/GitLab) → context synthesis → quality analysis (deep-review + bughunt + coverage) → test gap analysis → report.
- Produces
draft/jira-review/<JIRA_ID>/qualification-report.mdand (if gaps exist)remediation-plan.md. - Verdict: QUALIFIED / PARTIALLY QUALIFIED / NOT QUALIFIED.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

