agentleFS
dprakash2101dprakash2101/dotnet-production-agent-skills/skills/production-debugging/SKILL.md

production-debugging

Skill4 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Investigate live or production-like .NET failures using logs, traces, metrics, dumps, and configuration evidence. Use for production diagnosis; do not mutate production state or deploy fixes without explicit authorization.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Start with an incident timeline, impact, affected versions/instances/tenants, correlation identifiers, and recent deployments/configuration …

    line 8

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

.NET production debugging

Start with an incident timeline, impact, affected versions/instances/tenants, correlation identifiers, and recent deployments/configuration changes. Protect customer data and credentials in every query and output.

Form falsifiable hypotheses and request the smallest evidence needed: structured logs, distributed traces, relevant metrics, health/dependency signals, configuration provenance, or a narrowly captured dump/profile. Correlate by time and request/message identity; distinguish cause from downstream noise.

For high CPU, memory, thread-pool starvation, deadlock, or crash analysis, capture diagnostics with production-safe tooling and bounded duration/size. Account for collection overhead and retention/security rules. Never attach a debugger, restart, scale, change flags, clear queues/caches, or capture sensitive dumps without explicit authorization.

Conclude with verified facts, root cause or ranked hypotheses, evidence gaps, safe mitigation/fix options, and a validation/monitoring plan. Keep production diagnosis separate from authorization to change production.

For performance incidents, first identify whether CPU, allocation/GC, thread-pool pressure, contention or downstream latency is dominant. Choose bounded counters, traces or dumps appropriate to the evidence and assess capture overhead and sensitive-data retention.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.