agentleFS
dprakash2101dprakash2101/dotnet-production-agent-skills/skills/integration-testing-dotnet/SKILL.md

integration-testing-dotnet

Skill4 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementing or reviewing .NET integration tests across HTTP, persistence, messaging, or external services.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow the repository test framework and existing fixture conventions.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use an isolated database and the real provider when provider behavior matters.

    line 11
  3. Distinctive:

    Use an existing emulator or isolated service for messaging and external dependencies when practical.

    line 12

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Integration Testing Dotnet

Follow the repository test framework and existing fixture conventions. Identify the boundary and behavior that must be verified; use unit tests for isolated logic and integration tests where configuration, serialization, persistence, or host wiring matters.

  • For ASP.NET Core HTTP tests, use the established test host or WebApplicationFactory when appropriate. Exercise routing, authentication and resource authorization, validation, status codes, headers, serialization and sanitized failures over HTTP.
  • Use an isolated database and the real provider when provider behavior matters; avoid assuming an in-memory substitute represents relational constraints, transactions or SQL translation. Apply the actual migration path where relevant.
  • Use an existing emulator or isolated service for messaging and external dependencies when practical; otherwise substitute the boundary deliberately and state what is not covered. Never connect a test to production resources.
  • Isolate test data and resource names; clean up owned resources. Control time and parallelism, bound waiting, and avoid tests that depend on execution order or arbitrary sleeps.
  • Cover representative success and failure paths, cancellation and concurrency where material. Run the narrow affected suite and report unavailable dependencies or skipped checks.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.