agentleFS
dprakash2101dprakash2101/dotnet-production-agent-skills/skills/dotnet-architecture/SKILL.md

dotnet-architecture

Skill4 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design or assess architecture for substantial .NET and ASP.NET Core changes. Use for new APIs, major features, new integrations, or layering decisions; not for routine localized edits that preserve an established design.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default ASP.NET Core separation when the codebase has no contrary design:

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Read references/design-checks.md only when designing a new integration, background process, or public API.

    line 22

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

.NET architecture

First identify the repository's existing boundaries and conventions. Preserve an intentional existing architecture; do not impose a new pattern for a small change.

Default ASP.NET Core separation when the codebase has no contrary design:

Controller -> business/application service -> data or external integration
  • Controllers own routing, binding, validation coordination, auth integration, service invocation, and HTTP translation. Keep business rules, database access, external HTTP calls, and substantial transformation out of controllers.
  • Services own business behavior and orchestration. Use focused domain/helper components only when they clarify reusable or complex behavior; do not abstract five straightforward lines.
  • Data/integration components own persistence and transport details. Use established repositories, DbContexts, typed/named clients, SDK wrappers, and registration patterns.

For a major change, define affected components and contracts, concurrency and failure boundaries, configuration, observability, migration/rollout needs, and test seams before implementation. The valid change set may be large, but unrelated cleanup remains out of scope.

Read references/design-checks.md only when designing a new integration, background process, or public API.

Compare candidate designs against existing boundaries, operational complexity and change scope. Vertical slices, layered services and other established styles can all be appropriate depending on the repository.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.