dotnet-architecture
Skill4 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design or assess architecture for substantial .NET and ASP.NET Core changes. Use for new APIs, major features, new integrations, or layering decisions; not for routine localized edits that preserve an established design.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Attemainio/dotnet-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- landim32/awesome-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- emaginebr/AvaBottheir own version, first seen Apr 8, 2026
- Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 16, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills★ 13same name
- Attemainio/dotnet-toolkit★ 2same name
- emaginebr/AvaBot★ 2same name
- landim32/awesome-ai-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- global-instructions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- api-contract-safetySkill
- api-endpoint-deprecationSkill
- aspnet-core-api-developmentSkill
- background-services-dotnetSkill
- bug-investigationSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- context-resetSkill
- dependency-managementSkill
- deployment-readiness-dotnetSkill
- diff-reviewSkill
- distributed-workflowsSkill
- dotnet-implementationSkill
- dotnet-securitySkill
- ef-core-safetySkill
- exception-handlingSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- google-bigquery-dotnetSkill
- google-cloud-pubsub-dotnetSkill
- google-firestore-dotnetSkill
- http-client-integrationsSkill
- integration-testing-dotnetSkill
- observability-dotnetSkill
- performance-diagnostics-dotnetSkill
- poc-developmentSkill
- production-debuggingSkill
- production-hotfixSkill
- production-loggingSkill
- redis-dotnetSkill
- relational-database-dotnetSkill
- retry-resilienceSkill
- safe-terminalSkill
- shared-code-impactSkill
- targeted-validationSkill
- task-routerSkill
- unit-testingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Default ASP.NET Core separation when the codebase has no contrary design:
- Distinctive: line 22
Read references/design-checks.md only when designing a new integration, background process, or public API.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
.NET architecture
First identify the repository's existing boundaries and conventions. Preserve an intentional existing architecture; do not impose a new pattern for a small change.
Default ASP.NET Core separation when the codebase has no contrary design:
Controller -> business/application service -> data or external integration- Controllers own routing, binding, validation coordination, auth integration, service invocation, and HTTP translation. Keep business rules, database access, external HTTP calls, and substantial transformation out of controllers.
- Services own business behavior and orchestration. Use focused domain/helper components only when they clarify reusable or complex behavior; do not abstract five straightforward lines.
- Data/integration components own persistence and transport details. Use established repositories, DbContexts, typed/named clients, SDK wrappers, and registration patterns.
For a major change, define affected components and contracts, concurrency and failure boundaries, configuration, observability, migration/rollout needs, and test seams before implementation. The valid change set may be large, but unrelated cleanup remains out of scope.
Read references/design-checks.md only when designing a new integration, background process, or public API.
Compare candidate designs against existing boundaries, operational complexity and change scope. Vertical slices, layered services and other established styles can all be appropriate depending on the repository.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

