agentleFS
davidscotttuftsdavidscotttufts/hyvemind/skills/mine-skills/SKILL.md

mine-skills

Skill0 starsChanged 20 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Mine Claude Code session transcripts for how skills are actually used: frequency, and the chains run by hand again and again (A → B → C). Proposes composite skills for repeated chains and new skills for repeated manual work, each backed by counts and confidence. Local and read-only; asks before each run and reports aggregates only, never transcript content.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Skill miner

Proposals come from your history, not from guesses. Each one cites how many times the pattern actually happened.

1. Mine (local, read-only, asked first)

Transcripts hold whole sessions, including anything ever pasted into them: keys, customer data, private code. {{cli}} mine reads the JSONL files under ~/.claude/projects on this machine and makes no network calls.

  • ⛔ Ask the user before each run, naming the scope (this project or --all).
  • Report aggregates only: skill names, counts, chains, session ids. Never quote, summarise or paste transcript content, in the report or in chat, and don't name what a session contained, not even to say it was left out: an example is its session id and the step order. To understand a manual step, describe its shape ("edits the changelog, then tags"), not its text.
{{cli}} mine                 # sessions of this project (and its worktrees)
{{cli}} mine --all           # every project under ~/.claude/projects
{{cli}} mine --json > mine.json

The output has top skills, bigram chains with confidence (how often A is immediately followed by B, out of all runs of A), trigrams, and recent session sequences. Installed bee skills are counted under their unprefixed names.

2. Find proposals

  • Composite skill: a chain with count ≥ 5 and confidence ≥ 0.5. Package it as one skill that calls the existing skills in order with gates between them, like {{skill:ship-change}} does. Never copy their content into it.
  • New skill: the same manual multi-step work repeated across sessions with no skill behind it (look at recent sequences and at what happens between skill calls).
  • Retire signal: a skill nobody has run in 60+ days. Check it with {{skill:skill-eval}} before proposing removal.

3. Report

A table per proposal: the pattern, count, confidence, example session ids, and the proposed skill name and steps. Write it to SKILL_MINING_REPORT.md, or to the user if they prefer.

4. Scaffold (only when asked)

⛔ Ask before writing files. A new skill gets SKILL.md with a precise description (the description decides when an agent loads it) and at least one eval scenario ({{skill:skill-eval}}). That way its value is measured from day one.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.