vibe-merge
Skill57 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to "vibe-merge"/"vibe-marge" a PR or branch: independently reimplement good ideas, avoid blind merging/cherry-picking, preserve quality, and credit the contributor as co-author.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-browserSkill
- ai-newsSkill
- applescriptSkill
- birdSkill
- chat-to-skillSkill
- dont-anger-marioSkill
- github-issuesSkill
- keyboard-layout-decoderSkill
- maintainer-replySkill
- package-releaseSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- session-reflectSkill
- skill-discoverySkill
- twitter-thread-styleSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈20
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 13
Read the PR/branch metadata, diff, commits, discussion, requested changes, external reviews, and checks.
- Distinctive: line 16
If the email is private/unusable, use the GitHub noreply identity from the PR author when available.
- Distinctive: line 17
Write down the useful ideas and the risky parts separately.
- Distinctive: line 20
Start from the target base branch, not from the PR branch.
- Distinctive: line 22
Prefer smaller commits over a broad mixed rewrite.
- Distinctive: line 23
Do not copy large code blocks blindly.
- Distinctive: line 24
Keep unrelated PR churn out of the commit.
- Distinctive: line 27
Run focused tests for the touched area.
- Distinctive: line 28
Run the repo's normal check command before finalizing if feasible.
- Distinctive: line 29
If the PR idea has known review findings, fix them during the reimplementation instead of importing the bug.
- Distinctive: line 32
Every commit that incorporates a contributor's idea must include a trailer:
- Distinctive: line 38
If multiple contributors materially influenced the idea, include multiple trailers.
- Distinctive: line 39
Do not claim sole authorship for ideas mined from external PRs.
- Distinctive: line 46
When closing or commenting on the original PR, thank the contributor and explain briefly that selected ideas landed with co-author credit.
- Distinctive: line 50
Use the repository's normal commit style.
- Distinctive: line 63
Do not squash many unrelated ideas into one commit.
- Distinctive: line 64
Do not preserve a PR's bugs just to stay close to the source.
- Distinctive: line 65
Do not omit attribution because the implementation was rewritten.
- Distinctive: line 66
Do not force-push protected/shared branches unless explicitly requested.
- Distinctive: line 67
If the contributor has an open PR, avoid making comments that sound dismissive.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Vibe Merge
Vibe-merge means: mine a PR/branch for good ideas, implement the worthwhile parts ourselves in small reviewable commits, and credit the original contributor with Co-authored-by trailers. Do not merge the branch wholesale unless the user explicitly asks.
Workflow
- Inspect the source
- Read the PR/branch metadata, diff, commits, discussion, requested changes, external reviews, and checks.
- Identify the original author name/email from commits when possible:
git show -s --format='%an <%ae>' <commit>- If the email is private/unusable, use the GitHub noreply identity from the PR author when available.
- Write down the useful ideas and the risky parts separately.
- Pick one idea at a time
- Start from the target base branch, not from the PR branch.
- Implement the idea in the project's style and architecture.
- Prefer smaller commits over a broad mixed rewrite.
- Do not copy large code blocks blindly; adapt or reimplement to fit current abstractions.
- Keep unrelated PR churn out of the commit.
- Validate each idea
- Run focused tests for the touched area.
- Run the repo's normal check command before finalizing if feasible.
- If the PR idea has known review findings, fix them during the reimplementation instead of importing the bug.
- Credit the contributor
Every commit that incorporates a contributor's idea must include a trailer:
Co-authored-by: Contributor Name <email@example.com>- If multiple contributors materially influenced the idea, include multiple trailers.
- Do not claim sole authorship for ideas mined from external PRs.
- Communicate clearly
- Say which PR/branch the idea came from.
- Mention that it was reimplemented rather than merged directly.
- Draft any reply after reading the full conversation; do not repeat context the contributor already knows or expose private reasoning.
- Show the exact reply and wait for approval before posting.
- When closing or commenting on the original PR, thank the contributor and explain briefly that selected ideas landed with co-author credit.
Commit shape
Use the repository's normal commit style. Keep the body useful and include the co-author trailer at the end:
perf(canvas): cache retained scene backing
- Rebuild backing surfaces incrementally during viewport movement
- Fall back to direct rendering if CanvasKit cannot allocate an offscreen surface
Co-authored-by: Joey Cumines <123456+joeycumines@users.noreply.github.com>Guardrails
- Do not squash many unrelated ideas into one commit.
- Do not preserve a PR's bugs just to stay close to the source.
- Do not omit attribution because the implementation was rewritten.
- Do not force-push protected/shared branches unless explicitly requested.
- If the contributor has an open PR, avoid making comments that sound dismissive; frame it as incorporating their good ideas safely.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

