agentleFS
dannotedannote/dot-pi/skills/session-reflect/SKILL.md

session-reflect

Skill57 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Analyze a user's pi coding-agent session history for recurring behavior, prompting habits, workflow loops, friction, and preferences. Use when the user asks to inspect or reflect on pi sessions, common behavior patterns, agent/user interaction style, prompting habits, or personal pi workflow quality.

  • Installs packages

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 9

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to help the user understand their own pi usage patterns from local session logs.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not hardcode English behavior categories or phrase lists as conclusions.

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Treat repeated text, n-grams, FTS hits, and SQL aggregates as evidence leads, not interpretations.

    line 26
  4. Very specific:

    When the current user message is itself a high-signal intervention, follow the recovery protocol in references/intervention-events.md …

    line 31
  5. Very specific:

    Use scripts/session-db.ts as a local evidence workbench.

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    If the user points to another session root:

    line 50
  7. Very specific:

    Use --format table|json|markdown before the subcommand when output will be read by the agent or quoted in a report:

    line 84
  8. Distinctive:

    Read references/query-cookbook.md when selecting SQL queries.

    line 91
  9. Distinctive:

    If the task is reflection over a large history, extract user messages first.

    line 96
  10. Very specific:

    Run a bounded first-pass evidence set: overview, exact-short-repeats, tools, long-sessions, and sample --turns 3 --examples 2.

    line 98
  11. Distinctive:

    Run targeted searches for explicit current-user preferences mentioned in the conversation, then inspect context.

    line 101
  12. Distinctive:

    Ask whether the user wants tooling changes, pi prompt/default changes, or deeper follow-up analysis.

    line 104
  13. Distinctive:

    Use this structure unless the user asks otherwise:

    line 108

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Session Reflect

Use this skill to help the user understand their own pi usage patterns from local session logs.

Data location

By default this skill writes only to:

~/.pi/agent/cache/session-reflect/

It never writes analysis databases into the current project by default. Use --db only when the user explicitly asks for another location. Use clean to remove the default cache.

The skill's job is evidence retrieval + agent judgment. Do not turn the helper script into the analyst. Use the script to load/search/query session evidence; use your own reasoning to infer patterns cautiously.

Core rules

  • Discuss the analysis approach before implementing new tooling or making broad claims.
  • Do not hardcode English behavior categories or phrase lists as conclusions.
  • Treat repeated text, n-grams, FTS hits, and SQL aggregates as evidence leads, not interpretations.
  • Inspect surrounding context before interpreting short user turns like “go ahead” or “what next”.
  • Preserve multilingual text, typos, shorthand, pasted logs, and frustration markers as meaningful evidence.
  • Cite session paths or message keys for important claims.
  • Separate: observed facts, interpretations, confidence, alternative explanations, recommendations.
  • When the current user message is itself a high-signal intervention, follow the recovery protocol in references/intervention-events.md before continuing.

Helper script

Use scripts/session-db.ts as a local evidence workbench. It loads pi JSONL sessions into DuckDB and exposes SQL/search/context helpers.

Install helper dependencies from the skill directory if they are missing:

cd <dot-pi>/skills/session-reflect
npm install

Typical first step:

npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts build

If the user points to another session root:

npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts build --root <session-root>

Useful evidence commands:

npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts doctor
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts preset --list
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts preset overview
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts preset exact-short-repeats
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts preset long-sessions
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts turns --role user --limit 80
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts turns --role user --short --limit 100
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts ngrams --n 2 --min-count 3 --limit 50
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts ngrams --n 3 --min-count 3 --limit 50
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts search "literal or fuzzy lead" --role user --limit 25
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts context <message_key> --before 4 --after 8
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts context <message_key> --before 4 --after 8 --compact --hide-tools
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts examples --text "Go ahead." --limit 5 --before 3 --after 5
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts sample --turns 5 --examples 2 --before 3 --after 5
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --limit 30 --min-score 2 --sort score
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --limit 30 --min-score 2 --sort recent
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --signal autonomy_boundary,evidence_challenge --limit 20
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --project quackdb --since 2026-06-01 --limit 20
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --sample --limit 10 --min-score 2
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --pasted include --limit 20 --min-score 2
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --pasted only --limit 20 --min-score 2
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts interventions --context --limit 10 --min-score 2 --sort recent --before 4 --after 6
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts sql "select ..."

Use --format table|json|markdown before the subcommand when output will be read by the agent or quoted in a report:

npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts --format markdown preset exact-short-repeats
npx tsx scripts/session-db.ts --format json context <message_key>

Read references/query-cookbook.md when selecting SQL queries. Read references/reflection-protocol.md before producing a user-facing reflection. Read references/intervention-events.md when analyzing shouting, profanity, corrections, frustration, stop/pause requests, evidence challenges, or any high-signal user redirect.

Recommended workflow

  1. Clarify scope: recent sessions vs all sessions, coding-only vs all Pi use, and desired output depth.
  2. If the task is reflection over a large history, extract user messages first. Use them to identify candidate workflows and repeated corrections; retrieve assistant/tool context only around selected examples.
  3. Build or refresh the DuckDB evidence database with scripts/session-db.ts build.
  4. Run a bounded first-pass evidence set: overview, exact-short-repeats, tools, long-sessions, and sample --turns 3 --examples 2. Add n-grams only when exact repeats do not explain enough.
  5. Pick surprising evidence leads and retrieve compact context windows around representative message keys. For repeated exact turns, use examples --text ... for targeted sampling or sample for time-spread examples across top repeated turns. Use --compact --hide-tools first; rerun without them only when tool output matters.
  6. For friction analysis, treat candidate events as broad interventions, not just profanity/escalation. Use references/intervention-events.md before generalizing.
  7. Run targeted searches for explicit current-user preferences mentioned in the conversation, then inspect context.
  8. Reason manually from evidence; do not let preset names, query names, repeated phrases, profanity, or all-caps become conclusions.
  9. Present a concise reflection with citations and confidence levels.
  10. Ask whether the user wants tooling changes, pi prompt/default changes, or deeper follow-up analysis.

Output shape

Use this structure unless the user asks otherwise:

# Pi session behavior reflection

## Evidence inspected

- Database/session scope
- Query types used

## Observed patterns

For each pattern:

- Observation
- Evidence
- Interpretation
- Confidence
- Alternative explanation

## Friction / failure modes

## Preferences inferred from behavior

## Recommendations to test

## Open questions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.