package-release
Skill57 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare, publish, repair, or verify package releases and changelogs. Always use for package/version release, publish, ship, tag, changelog, release notes, registry publication, documentation publication, or GitHub Release work. Distinguish package releases from application deployments before acting.
- Commits and pushes
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jean1880/nuvek-agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- peteonrails/voxtypetheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- aditya-deokar/software-factorytheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
- MrPunyapal/laravel-auditortheir own version, first seen Aug 14, 2026
- ropensci-review-tools/ropensci-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 24, 2026
- jessepinkman9900/claude-second-braintheir own version, first seen Apr 20, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- peteonrails/voxtype★ 1.8ksame name
- MrPunyapal/laravel-auditor★ 60same name
- jessepinkman9900/claude-second-brain★ 46same name
- ropensci-review-tools/ropensci-skills★ 8same name
- aditya-deokar/software-factory★ 0same name
- jean1880/nuvek-agent-config★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-browserSkill
- ai-newsSkill
- applescriptSkill
- birdSkill
- chat-to-skillSkill
- dont-anger-marioSkill
- github-issuesSkill
- keyboard-layout-decoderSkill
- maintainer-replySkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- session-reflectSkill
- skill-discoverySkill
- twitter-thread-styleSkill
- vibe-mergeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
27 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
18
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Do not add an opening summary, closing sentence, generated prose, commit list, contributor list, checksum, or publication status.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not add Install/Installation sections or dependency snippets.
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not append Hex, HexDocs, npm, crates.io, changelog, compare, marketing, or “full changelog” links.
- Very specific: line 27
Never use generated GitHub notes (--generate-notes).
- Distinctive: line 28
Never embellish terse changelog notes.
- Very specific: line 29
Always pass multiline notes through a file with --notes-file.
- Very specific: line 30
Never use regex, awk, or sed to determine Markdown section boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 35
Every entry must answer:
- Distinctive: line 50
Test additions, test counts, CI status, or quality-gate output
- Distinctive: line 63
Use this format for new owned-project release sections unless repository instructions or an upstream fork require preserving another …
- Distinctive: line 109
Keep releases in reverse chronological order.
- Very specific: line 110
Keep an Unreleased section at the top.
- Distinctive: line 112
Use only the categories above, in the order above.
- Very specific: line 113
Put upgrade-required source/config/data changes under Breaking changes, including for 0.x packages.
- Very specific: line 114
Use Compatibility only for supported Elixir/OTP/runtime/framework versions, operating systems, architectures, or explicit interoperability …
- Very specific: line 115
Do not use New, Improved, Highlights, Fixes, What's New, Tests, Validation, Links, or project-specific release headings.
- Very specific: line 116
Do not rewrite historical sections merely to adopt the standard.
- Distinctive: line 121
Before choosing commands, inspect:
- Distinctive: line 141
Never force-move a release tag unless the user explicitly approves and the project’s release process permits it.
- Distinctive: line 145
Before the first irreversible action:
- Distinctive: line 147
Read the target level-two changelog section.
- Distinctive: line 149
Read the temporary file back.
- Distinctive: line 157
Use repository-specific commands.
- Distinctive: line 166
If an artifact workflow already created the release:
- Distinctive: line 176
If a registry requests 2FA, stop and ask for the current code.
- Very specific: line 194
Use gh release view "$tag" --json name,tagName,body,isDraft,isPrerelease and compare the returned body directly with the prepared notes …
- Distinctive: line 208
Do not reproduce release-note boilerplate or add promotional/footer links unless the user asks.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Package Releases
Release notes are user documentation. CHANGELOG.md is their canonical source. Never invent a second narrative during publication.
Classify the request
- Update the changelog — edit
Unreleasedonly. Do not bump, tag, push, or publish. - Prepare a release — bump/align versions, roll the changelog, validate, and stop before irreversible actions.
- Release / publish / ship — complete every applicable release output: package, package documentation, tag, GitHub Release, and public verification. Do not stop after publishing only one artifact.
- Repair a release — derive missing or corrected metadata from the tagged changelog; do not generate replacement prose.
- Deploy — this skill does not define application deployment. Clarify when “release” could mean an OTP/app deployment rather than a package version.
A direct request to release, publish, ship, or cut a version authorizes the complete workflow after a clean preflight. Ask only when the version or intent is ambiguous, repository state is unexpected, project instructions require confirmation, or authentication/2FA is needed.
Non-negotiable release-note contract
- GitHub Release title is exactly the tag, normally
vX.Y.Z. - GitHub Release body is exactly the body of the matching
CHANGELOG.mdversion section, excluding the level-two version heading. - Do not add an opening summary, closing sentence, generated prose, commit list, contributor list, checksum, or publication status.
- Do not add Install/Installation sections or dependency snippets.
- Do not append Hex, HexDocs, npm, crates.io, changelog, compare, marketing, or “full changelog” links.
- Never use generated GitHub notes (
--generate-notes). - Never embellish terse changelog notes.
- Always pass multiline notes through a file with
--notes-file; never inline Markdown in--notesor a shell string. - Never use regex,
awk, orsedto determine Markdown section boundaries. Read the Markdown structure directly or use the repository’s canonical parser/extractor. - Preserve directly relevant issue, pull-request, migration, or security links already present in the canonical changelog. Do not add links during release publication.
Changelog audience
Every entry must answer:
What changed for a package user deciding whether or how to upgrade?
Include:
- New public behavior or APIs
- Changed behavior
- User-visible bug fixes
- Observable performance improvements
- Compatibility and platform changes
- Deprecations, removals, security changes, and migration requirements
Exclude:
- Test additions, test counts, CI status, or quality-gate output
- Corpus, calibration, benchmark-gate, precision-ratchet, or release-gate results
- Checksums, publication status, and generated documentation status
- Local paths, path dependencies, dogfooding setup, and maintainer workstation state
- Release preparation and internal workflow changes
- Internal refactors without a user-visible outcome
- Dependency/lockfile updates without compatibility, security, or behavioral impact
- Temporary operational details and implementation-specific validation
Describe internal work through its user-visible outcome. For example, write “Improved analysis performance on large diffs,” not how many packages or tests were used to validate it.
Canonical changelog format
Use this format for new owned-project release sections unless repository instructions or an upstream fork require preserving another established format:
# Changelog
## Unreleased
## 1.2.3 - 2026-07-20
### Breaking changes
- ...
### Added
- ...
### Changed
- ...
### Deprecated
- ...
### Removed
- ...
### Fixed
- ...
### Security
- ...
### Compatibility
- ...Rules:
- Version headings do not include
v; tags normally do. - Dates use ISO
YYYY-MM-DD. - Keep releases in reverse chronological order.
- Keep an
Unreleasedsection at the top. - Omit empty categories.
- Use only the categories above, in the order above.
- Put upgrade-required source/config/data changes under
Breaking changes, including for0.xpackages. Do not duplicate them underChangedorRemoved. - Use
Compatibilityonly for supported Elixir/OTP/runtime/framework versions, operating systems, architectures, or explicit interoperability boundaries—not ordinary dependency bumps. - Do not use
New,Improved,Highlights,Fixes,What's New,Tests,Validation,Links, or project-specific release headings. - Do not rewrite historical sections merely to adopt the standard. Normalize
Unreleasedand future releases prospectively. - Preserve upstream changelog conventions in maintained forks, while still enforcing the audience and exact-release-body rules.
Discover project release mechanics
Before choosing commands, inspect:
- Repository instructions (
AGENTS.md, contributing/release docs) - Working-tree and remote synchronization state
- Current package version(s) and intended tag
CHANGELOG.mdand the exact target section- Package manifests and package file lists
- Tag-triggered workflows and reusable release workflows
- Existing tag and GitHub Release state
- Registry authentication and required 2FA
Respect project-specific publication mechanics. They may change command order; they do not override the release-note audience contract.
Common topologies:
- Manual registry release — validate, publish package/docs, push the correct tag, create the GitHub Release.
- Tag-triggered publication — push the prepared commit and tag, watch the workflow, then verify every output. Do not duplicate local publication.
- Precompiled/native artifacts — tag may create the GitHub asset release first. Wait for required assets/checksums, complete package publication, then edit the existing GitHub Release to the canonical title/body instead of creating another release.
- Monorepo — determine version alignment, package-specific versus shared tags/changelogs, and every package expected to publish before acting.
Never force-move a release tag unless the user explicitly approves and the project’s release process permits it. Prefer a corrective patch release when immutable artifacts may already exist.
Prepare and review notes
Before the first irreversible action:
- Read the target level-two changelog section.
- Copy only its body to
/tmp/<package>-<version>-release-notes.md. - Read the temporary file back.
- Reject it if it violates the audience or heading rules.
- Confirm the package version, commit, tag, release topology, exact title, and exact body.
Show the exact body when it was drafted or changed during the current task. Do not present a separate model-written summary as proposed release notes.
Publish
Use repository-specific commands. For GitHub, use the notes file:
gh release create "$tag" \
--verify-tag \
--title "$tag" \
--notes-file "$notes_file"If an artifact workflow already created the release:
gh release edit "$tag" \
--title "$tag" \
--notes-file "$notes_file"Set prerelease/latest state according to the version and project policy. Do not add body text to communicate those states.
If a registry requests 2FA, stop and ask for the current code. Do not retry stale codes or claim publication succeeded after an authentication failure.
Verify before declaring success
A release is complete only after verifying every applicable item:
- Registry version exists and has the intended metadata
- Package documentation exists
- Remote tag points to the intended commit
- GitHub Release exists for the tag
- Release title exactly equals the tag
- Release body exactly equals the changelog section body
- Draft/prerelease/latest state is correct
- Required native/binary assets exist
- Publish workflows succeeded
- Working tree has no accidental release-created changes
- Downstream dogfood projects no longer use temporary local path dependencies
Use gh release view "$tag" --json name,tagName,body,isDraft,isPrerelease and compare the returned body directly with the prepared notes file. If they differ, repair the release before reporting completion.
Final response
Report only concrete outcomes:
- Version/package published
- Documentation published
- Tag pushed
- GitHub Release created or repaired
- Relevant release checks completed
- Any downstream version update
- Clean/synchronized repository state
Do not reproduce release-note boilerplate or add promotional/footer links unless the user asks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

