compress
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Reduce length while preserving the highest-value information, argument structure, and evidence qualifiers.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- voxlo-dev/Lean-Coding-Workspacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xcota/postheir own version, first seen Oct 18, 2026
- dev-willbird1936/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- dorian-akhs/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 1, 2026
- utk2103/Prompt-Studiotheir own version, first seen Aug 22, 2026
- trapple/skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 21, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use caveman-review, caveman-commit and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
huangzidaSkillcaveman-review
Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- huangzidaSkill
caveman-commit
Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes /caveman-commit. Auto-triggers when staging changes.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcaveman
Ultra-compressed response style that reduces output token count while preserving technical accuracy, with intensity levels and auto-clarity safety rules
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- cwinvestments/memstack★ 433same name
- xcota/pos★ 32same name
- JPauravS/claudecode-token-optimizer★ 8same name
- utk2103/Prompt-Studio★ 8same name
- hmzainjamil/claude-ai-skills★ 3same name
- huangzida/skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- voxlo-dev/Lean-Coding-Workspace★ 2same name
- waseemnasir2k26/skynetlabs-all-claude-code★ 2same name
- caseyng/Claude-skills★ 1same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository101 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- abstract-reviewSkill
- literature-gapSkill
- methodology-reviewSkill
- paper-structureSkill
- results-discussion-alignmentSkill
- reviewer-responseSkill
- book-outlineSkill
- chapter-purposeSkill
- character-consistencySkill
- narrative-arcSkill
- pacing-checkSkill
- timeline-consistencySkill
- citation-accuracySkill
- citation-checkSkill
- citation-completenessSkill
- citation-generationSkill
- citation-relevanceSkill
- citation-styleSkill
- duplicate-reference-checkSkill
- reference-list-checkSkill
- source-claim-mappingSkill
- source-to-claim-mapSkill
- active-voiceSkill
- ambiguity-checkSkill
- clarity-checkSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- concision-checkSkill
- grammar-checkSkill
- jargon-checkSkill
- parallelism-checkSkill
- passive-voiceSkill
- proofreadingSkill
- punctuation-checkSkill
- readability-checkSkill
- redundancy-checkSkill
- repetition-checkSkill
- spelling-checkSkill
- terminology-consistencySkill
- tone-checkSkill
- attribution-auditSkill
- claim-auditSkill
- final-document-auditSkill
- overclaiming-checkSkill
- plagiarism-risk-reviewSkill
- quotation-integritySkill
- self-plagiarism-riskSkill
- source-provenanceSkill
- chapter-structureSkill
- manuscript-consistencySkill
- manuscript-readinessSkill
- manuscript-structureSkill
- title-page-checkSkill
- cover-letterSkill
- ethics-disclosure-checkSkill
- journal-fitSkill
- peer-review-readinessSkill
- submission-requirementsSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- completeness-checkSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Compress
Identify the document's essential propositions and support. Remove filler and merge duplicate material before shortening sentences. Preserve citations and conditions attached to claims.
Quality gates: no loss of required evidence, qualification, attribution, or logical dependency.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.