paper-structure
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Evaluate an academic paper's structural alignment among abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- JihaoXin/paper-machinetheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- JihaoXin/paper-machine★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository101 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- abstract-reviewSkill
- literature-gapSkill
- methodology-reviewSkill
- results-discussion-alignmentSkill
- reviewer-responseSkill
- book-outlineSkill
- chapter-purposeSkill
- character-consistencySkill
- narrative-arcSkill
- pacing-checkSkill
- timeline-consistencySkill
- citation-accuracySkill
- citation-checkSkill
- citation-completenessSkill
- citation-generationSkill
- citation-relevanceSkill
- citation-styleSkill
- duplicate-reference-checkSkill
- reference-list-checkSkill
- source-claim-mappingSkill
- source-to-claim-mapSkill
- active-voiceSkill
- ambiguity-checkSkill
- clarity-checkSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- concision-checkSkill
- grammar-checkSkill
- jargon-checkSkill
- parallelism-checkSkill
- passive-voiceSkill
- proofreadingSkill
- punctuation-checkSkill
- readability-checkSkill
- redundancy-checkSkill
- repetition-checkSkill
- spelling-checkSkill
- terminology-consistencySkill
- tone-checkSkill
- attribution-auditSkill
- claim-auditSkill
- final-document-auditSkill
- overclaiming-checkSkill
- plagiarism-risk-reviewSkill
- quotation-integritySkill
- self-plagiarism-riskSkill
- source-provenanceSkill
- chapter-structureSkill
- manuscript-consistencySkill
- manuscript-readinessSkill
- manuscript-structureSkill
- title-page-checkSkill
- cover-letterSkill
- ethics-disclosure-checkSkill
- journal-fitSkill
- peer-review-readinessSkill
- submission-requirementsSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- completeness-checkSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Paper Structure
Trace the research question through each major section. Check that the introduction establishes the problem, methods answer the question, results report what was found, discussion interprets rather than invents results, and conclusion reflects the evidence.
Quality gates: section-to-section traceability and no hidden structural gaps.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.