platform-migration
Skill167 starsChanged 27 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use for platform-rearchitecture, runtime migration, hosted/local routing changes, storage/session/DR migrations, or staged movement between old and new application boundaries in MahoShojo-Generator. Do not use for isolated feature work inside one already-stable runtime.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-contract-changeSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- ui-reviewSkill
- ui-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Read docs/AGENTS.md, docs/README.md, the relevant topic page, accepted architecture/ADR/spec, migration plan and current code/CI facts.
- Distinctive: line 13
Write down current state, target state and the exact migration gap.
- Distinctive: line 16
Keep feature flags/configuration from becoming a way to bypass accepted MUST/MUST NOT semantics.
- Very specific: line 18
Update migration/topic/status documentation when actual state changes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Platform Migration
Web/Desktop 产品共源迁移同时使用双端共源切片模板与验收指南:先对照实际页面、状态、CSS/资源与副作用,再分共享层和宿主适配;按风险裁剪模板,不增加全站清单/hash/报告 marker 门禁。阶段与进度仍只维护唯一 Desktop 计划。
Workflow
- Read
docs/AGENTS.md,docs/README.md, the relevant topic page, accepted architecture/ADR/spec, migration plan and current code/CI facts. - Write down current state, target state and the exact migration gap. Do not describe target architecture as already deployed.
- Preserve trust boundaries and compatibility while moving one coherent seam at a time. Prefer adapters/versioned contracts over hidden app→app coupling.
- For stateful components, reason explicitly about ownership, idempotency, retries, fencing, failover, rollback and old/new coexistence.
- Keep feature flags/configuration from becoming a way to bypass accepted MUST/MUST NOT semantics.
- Validate the migrated seam with targeted tests and realistic recovery/failure cases. Expand to cross-runtime/full verification at cutover-level boundaries.
- Update migration/topic/status documentation when actual state changes; do not rewrite historical reports to manufacture consistency.
High-risk boundary
Production deploy/cutover, remote migration, secret changes and irreversible data operations require explicit user authorization even if the implementation is ready.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

