api-contract-change
Skill167 starsChanged 27 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when changing API/DTO/schema/wire-format contracts, SSE/event payloads, shared protocol packages, or producer/consumer mappings across MahoShojo-Generator runtimes. Do not use for implementation-only changes that preserve the existing contract.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- code-reviewSkill
- platform-migrationSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- ui-reviewSkill
- ui-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Add regression coverage at the boundary that previously allowed drift, including replay/reconnect paths when the protocol supports them.
- Distinctive: line 16
Run targeted contract/runtime tests first.
- Distinctive: line 20
Ask only when the desired breaking/compatibility policy is genuinely unresolved by current accepted docs or when production …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
API Contract Change
Workflow
- Locate the canonical schema/contract and applicable accepted ADR/spec from the relevant docs topic.
- Enumerate every producer, consumer, mapper/adapter, persistence/replay path, public projection and compatibility test before editing.
- Separate internal telemetry/server fields from public client contracts; do not leak server-only authority or secrets through a convenience projection.
- Decide compatibility behavior explicitly: additive/backward-compatible, versioned, migration required, or intentionally breaking.
- Modify the canonical contract first, then synchronize producers/consumers and regenerate derived artifacts using existing repo tools.
- Add regression coverage at the boundary that previously allowed drift, including replay/reconnect paths when the protocol supports them.
- Run targeted contract/runtime tests first; expand to workspace/global verification only when shared boundaries changed.
Stop / ask
Ask only when the desired breaking/compatibility policy is genuinely unresolved by current accepted docs or when production migration/cutover authorization is required.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

