toolchain-preflight
Skill2 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Resolve local shell, runtime, package-manager, browser, quoting, or encoding blockers before retrying the real task. Use when the execution path itself is unknown or broken. Not for application bugs or planned runtime migrations.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkitword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkit★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bin/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- evaluations/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- orchestration/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/llms.txtllms.txt
- bug-finderSkill
- codebase-evolution-controllerSkill
- codebase-improvement-plannerSkill
- completion-proofSkill
- content-provenance-hygieneSkill
- cpp-engineeringSkill
- debugging-investigatorSkill
- delegate-with-mission-cardsSkill
- documentation-synchronizerSkill
- expo-react-native-builderSkill
- flutter-production-builderSkill
- go-engineeringSkill
- kotlin-engineeringSkill
- mobile-architecture-directorSkill
- multi-agent-work-coordinatorSkill
- optimize-codebase-performanceSkill
- product-design-directorSkill
- production-web-builderSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- repository-intelligenceSkill
- review-and-refactor-codeSkill
- rust-engineeringSkill
- screenshot-to-interfaceSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- swift-engineeringSkill
- typescript-quality-enforcerSkill
- verification-and-releaseSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Use this skill when required executables or invocation behavior are unknown, or a task is blocked by shell/runtime/package-manager shims, …
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not trigger when the repository's documented command already reaches the real task, for application debugging, deliberate …
- Very specific: line 23
Prefer existing documented/system/runtime paths before installs or environment mutation.
- Distinctive: line 24
Do not repeatedly retry an unchanged failing mechanism.
- Distinctive: line 25
Use scratch locations for probes that should not affect the repository.
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not bypass execution policy/security controls merely to make a command run.
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not fix shell quoting, Windows command shims, or native-command invocation by nesting interpreters around destructive commands.
- Distinctive: line 31
Establish the documented path: Read repository instructions and exact command first.
- Distinctive: line 34
Select one safe invocation: Prefer the least-mutating supported path.
- Distinctive: line 44
If every supported invocation requires an unauthorized install or policy change, stop with the exact blocker and the smallest required user …
- Distinctive: line 48
Stop as soon as one supported invocation reliably reaches the actual task, or when a concrete environment/policy blocker prevents that …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Toolchain Preflight
Resolve one supported local execution path, then get out of the way.
Trigger boundary
Use this skill when required executables or invocation behavior are unknown, or a task is blocked by shell/runtime/package-manager shims, incompatible local runtimes, quoting, browser binaries/capability, or text encoding.
Do not trigger when the repository's documented command already reaches the real task, for application debugging, deliberate dependency/runtime migrations, or final release judgment.
Required inputs
Resolve repository instructions, working-tree/user state, OS/shell, documented command, required runtime/executable/capability, first exact failure, and any policy constraints on installs/downloads.
Safety baseline
- Preserve uncommitted user work.
- Prefer existing documented/system/runtime paths before installs or environment mutation.
- Do not repeatedly retry an unchanged failing mechanism.
- Use scratch locations for probes that should not affect the repository.
- Do not bypass execution policy/security controls merely to make a command run.
- Do not fix shell quoting, Windows command shims, or native-command invocation by nesting interpreters around destructive commands. Apply the cross-platform destructive-operation boundary in the toolkit workflow catalog first.
Workflow
- Establish the documented path. Read repository instructions and exact command first.
- Resolve real executables. Distinguish shell shims/wrappers from underlying runtimes and package managers.
- Classify the failure. Missing executable, blocked shim, wrong version/architecture, stale virtual environment, quoting, browser capability, encoding, or actual application failure.
- Select one safe invocation. Prefer the least-mutating supported path.
- Probe once, then run the real task. A successful version probe is not enough; confirm the invocation reaches the repository task.
- Hand off immediately. Once the execution path works, application behavior belongs to its specialist.
Handoffs and interaction boundaries
Application failures go to debugging-investigator; planned version transitions to codebase-evolution-controller; browser/app implementation to the owning builder; final integrated evidence to verification-and-release.
Failure handling
If every supported invocation requires an unauthorized install or policy change, stop with the exact blocker and the smallest required user action. If the real command runs and then fails inside the application, preflight is complete.
Stop conditions
Stop as soon as one supported invocation reliably reaches the actual task, or when a concrete environment/policy blocker prevents that without unauthorized changes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

