agentleFS
cmdr-characmdr-chara/codex-toolkit/skills/mobile-architecture-director/SKILL.md

mobile-architecture-director

Skill2 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Choose a mobile architecture among Flutter, Expo/React Native, native, and other viable options. Use when platform choice or mobile architecture direction is unresolved. Not for building an app whose stack is already chosen.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when platform choice, native/shared boundaries, or mobile architecture direction is unresolved.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not trigger to implement an already selected Flutter or Expo/React Native application.

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    Treat current framework/store/platform claims as volatile and verify them from primary sources.

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not choose by popularity or one benchmark.

    line 24
  5. Very specific:

    Compare viable options: Use references/platform-decision-matrix.md and verify its current-facts checklist.

    line 31
  6. Very specific:

    Produce the decision record: Use references/mobile-nonfunctional-requirements.md for nonfunctional coverage and state when to reconsider …

    line 36
  7. Distinctive:

    If evidence cannot distinguish viable options, do not fabricate a winner.

    line 44
  8. Distinctive:

    Stop when the viable options, disqualifiers, weights, sensitivity, proof spikes, chosen boundaries, and reconsideration triggers are …

    line 48

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Mobile Architecture Director

Choose a mobile approach from product and operating constraints rather than framework preference.

Trigger boundary

Use this skill when platform choice, native/shared boundaries, or mobile architecture direction is unresolved.

Do not trigger to implement an already selected Flutter or Expo/React Native application.

Required inputs

Resolve product journeys, target platforms/devices, team skills, native/API requirements, offline/data model, security/privacy, accessibility, performance, distribution/update constraints, long-term ownership, working-tree state, and decision reversibility.

Safety baseline

  • Preserve user work and existing repository evidence.
  • Treat current framework/store/platform claims as volatile and verify them from primary sources.
  • Do not choose by popularity or one benchmark.
  • A must-have capability can disqualify an option regardless of weighted score.

Workflow

  1. Define must-have gates. Record platform/API/store/security/offline/accessibility constraints and explicit disqualifiers.
  2. Model the product architecture. Identify shared domain/data logic, native integrations, UI/platform-specific behavior, background work, and distribution boundaries.
  3. Compare viable options. Use references/platform-decision-matrix.md and verify its current-facts checklist; include Flutter, Expo/RN, separate native, and other relevant approaches rather than forcing all options.
  4. Weight criteria. Score only criteria that matter to this product and show the weights so the result is inspectable.
  5. Prototype uncertainty. Define proof spikes for critical unknowns such as native SDKs, background work, performance, accessibility, build/signing, or offline durability.
  6. Test sensitivity. Re-run the decision when plausible weight changes or proof-spike results could flip it.
  7. Define boundaries. State what is shared versus native/platform-specific and who owns escape hatches.
  8. Produce the decision record. Use references/mobile-nonfunctional-requirements.md for nonfunctional coverage and state when to reconsider the choice.

Handoffs and interaction boundaries

Hand selected Flutter work to flutter-production-builder, Expo/RN to expo-react-native-builder, native work to the appropriate native implementation workflow, security-first questions to security-review, and final release judgment to verification-and-release.

Failure handling

If evidence cannot distinguish viable options, do not fabricate a winner; define the smallest prototype or missing fact that would. If a must-have fails, remove the option before weighted comparison.

Stop conditions

Stop when the viable options, disqualifiers, weights, sensitivity, proof spikes, chosen boundaries, and reconsideration triggers are explicit enough to commit to a platform direction.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.