multi-agent-work-coordinator
Skill2 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Plan safe parallel work across independently ownable resources with dependency ordering and exclusive write ownership. Use when multiple bounded work items can proceed independently. Not for exploring an unknown problem or small, tightly coupled work.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkitword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkit★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bin/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- evaluations/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- orchestration/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/llms.txtllms.txt
- bug-finderSkill
- codebase-evolution-controllerSkill
- codebase-improvement-plannerSkill
- completion-proofSkill
- content-provenance-hygieneSkill
- cpp-engineeringSkill
- debugging-investigatorSkill
- delegate-with-mission-cardsSkill
- documentation-synchronizerSkill
- expo-react-native-builderSkill
- flutter-production-builderSkill
- go-engineeringSkill
- kotlin-engineeringSkill
- mobile-architecture-directorSkill
- optimize-codebase-performanceSkill
- product-design-directorSkill
- production-web-builderSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- repository-intelligenceSkill
- review-and-refactor-codeSkill
- rust-engineeringSkill
- screenshot-to-interfaceSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- swift-engineeringSkill
- toolchain-preflightSkill
- typescript-quality-enforcerSkill
- verification-and-releaseSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when several bounded work items can proceed independently after the relevant resource boundaries, dependencies, and …
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not trigger for initial discovery of an unknown problem space, tiny/tightly coupled work, ambiguous tasks, or choosing a Mission Control …
- Distinctive: line 26
Keep integration and final acceptance with the parent task.
- Distinctive: line 30
Decide if parallelism helps: Keep tightly coupled or sequential work together.
- Very specific: line 31
Build the graph: Use references/work-graph-schema.md for missions, dependencies, resource scopes, acceptance evidence, and integration …
- Distinctive: line 32
Assign exclusive ownership: When scopes can be represented as workspace-relative paths/globs or logical resource IDs, run:
- Very specific: line 39
Delegate: Use references/mission-control-adapter.md when Mission Control is the execution adapter.
- Distinctive: line 42
Close the graph: Every node must be accepted, blocked, cancelled, or explicitly dropped by scope authority.
- Distinctive: line 50
If ownership overlaps or a shared contract is unstable, serialize or regroup the work instead of forcing parallelism.
- Distinctive: line 54
Stop when the work graph is integrated with accepted evidence or when an explicit dependency, ownership, authority, or environment blocker …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Multi-Agent Work Coordinator
Parallelize only work that is understood well enough to own, verify, and integrate independently.
Trigger boundary
Use this skill when several bounded work items can proceed independently after the relevant resource boundaries, dependencies, and acceptance criteria are known.
Do not trigger for initial discovery of an unknown problem space, tiny/tightly coupled work, ambiguous tasks, or choosing a Mission Control role alone.
Required inputs
Resolve the objective, acceptance criteria, candidate work items, dependencies, shared resources/artifacts, mutable-resource ownership, verification methods, protected user work, and integration owner. For repository tasks, also resolve relevant working-tree state and code ownership.
Safety baseline
- Preserve user work and unrelated artifacts.
- Give each mutable resource one writer at a time.
- Readers may overlap; writers may not.
- Parallelism never bypasses a specialist's safety, approval, privacy, or migration boundary.
- Keep integration and final acceptance with the parent task.
Workflow
- Decide if parallelism helps. Keep tightly coupled or sequential work together.
- Build the graph. Use
references/work-graph-schema.mdfor missions, dependencies, resource scopes, acceptance evidence, and integration gates. - Assign exclusive ownership. When scopes can be represented as workspace-relative paths/globs or logical resource IDs, run:
python skills/multi-agent-work-coordinator/scripts/ownership_check.py <work-graph.json>- Form waves. Dispatch only dependency-ready work whose mutable-resource scopes do not overlap.
- Delegate. Use
references/mission-control-adapter.mdwhen Mission Control is the execution adapter. - Review handoffs. Require produced artifacts/evidence/blockers, not "done" assertions.
- Integrate in declared order. Resolve cross-mission drift and rerun integration-level checks affected by composition.
- Close the graph. Every node must be accepted, blocked, cancelled, or explicitly dropped by scope authority.
Handoffs and interaction boundaries
For repository work, repository-intelligence supplies unclear architecture/ownership boundaries. delegate-with-mission-cards selects and dispatches portable Mission Control roles. Domain specialists own technical or subject-matter decisions. completion-proof may prove substantial completion; verification-and-release owns final software ship judgment.
Failure handling
If ownership overlaps or a shared contract is unstable, serialize or regroup the work instead of forcing parallelism. If a subagent result lacks required evidence, reject the handoff and return it to the same owned scope.
Stop conditions
Stop when the work graph is integrated with accepted evidence or when an explicit dependency, ownership, authority, or environment blocker makes safe parallel execution impossible.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

