decision
Skill1 starsChanged 39 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Takes a yes/no question plus the facts and returns a verdict with the reason behind it. Use when you want a recommendation you can act on, not a pile of information. Trigger on: "decision skill", "should I", "make the call", "go or skip", "yes or no on this", "give me a verdict".
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sohaibt/product-modetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lulufoo/lulu-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- qbicus/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- emiljuchnikowski/ai-os-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- tsukumogami/shirabetheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- chrisalehman/bionictheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brief, plan and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- sohaibt/product-mode★ 176same name
- aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace★ 34same name
- chrisalehman/bionic★ 9same name
- mhxie/Atelier★ 5same name
- lulufoo/lulu-workflow★ 3same name
- madebypx/PXOS★ 3same name
- Jsnnmsc/10000x-engineer★ 2same name
- roethlar/AgentGovernanceBootstrap★ 2same name
- Tamircohen28/tamirs-superpowers★ 2same name
- yacb2/aidex★ 2same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- advisor-modeSkill
- brain-setupSkill
- ceo-briefSkill
- cerebro-doctorSkill
- council-modeSkill
- daily-briefSkill
- memory-attribution-lintSkill
- memory-recallSkill
- orchestrator-modeSkill
- sessionendSkill
- sessionstartSkill
- skill-manageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 52
Keep the criteria short and honest.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision
Most AI hands you information. This skill hands you a call. Give it a question with a yes or no answer and the facts it needs, and it weighs them against your criteria and returns a verdict with the reason behind it.
What it does
- Takes your question and the facts you give it.
- Weighs the facts against the criteria you set.
- Returns a verdict: yes or no, go or skip.
- Gives the one or two reasons that drove the call, so you can sanity-check it.
- Says what fact would flip the verdict, so you know what to double-check.
Scope
- Reads: the question and facts you provide, plus any file you point it at.
- Writes: nothing by default. Ask it to log the decision to your Brain's
decisions/decisions.mdif you want a record. - Reaches: nothing. This skill reasons over what you give it.
How to use it
Tell your AI:
Use the decision skill. Question:
<yes/no question>. Facts:<the facts>. My criteria:<what matters>. Give me the verdict and the reason.
Examples:
Use the decision skill. Question: should I take this meeting? Facts:
<who, why, when>. Criteria: it moves a real project forward or I owe the person. Verdict and reason.
For each item in today's brief, use the decision skill. Question: is this worth an hour this week? Criteria: it serves a current goal and nobody else will do it. Return go or skip and one reason each.
Make it yours
- Point it at any recurring yes/no you face. This is the step that turns a chatbot into something that does work.
- Stack it on the daily brief: the brief ranks the items, decision calls each one.
- Keep the criteria short and honest. Vague criteria give vague verdicts.
- Log the calls you act on. A month later, memory-recall can show you which calls held up.
Ships with the Libro libro-starter profile. Your AI. Your machine. Your rules.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.