decision
Skill176 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write a product-mode decision record for a choice made in this conversation and save it to .product-mode/decisions/. Use when the user types /decision.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lulufoo/lulu-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- qbicus/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- emiljuchnikowski/ai-os-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- tsukumogami/shirabetheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- chrisalehman/bionictheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- mhxie/Ateliertheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brief, plan and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace★ 34same name
- chrisalehman/bionic★ 9same name
- mhxie/Atelier★ 5same name
- lulufoo/lulu-workflow★ 3same name
- madebypx/PXOS★ 3same name
- Jsnnmsc/10000x-engineer★ 2same name
- roethlar/AgentGovernanceBootstrap★ 2same name
- Tamircohen28/tamirs-superpowers★ 2same name
- yacb2/aidex★ 2same name
- cerebrocybersolutions/libro★ 1same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Check .product-mode/decisions/ for an entry about the same decision.
- Distinctive: line 14
Options considered: every option that was discussed, including the rejected ones
- Distinctive: line 18
Never invent options, reasons, or evidence that the conversation does not contain.
- Distinctive: line 19
If the decision is a one-way door (public API, data schema, pricing, brand, core UX), confirm that the user signed off and that the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision record
Record the decision the user names. Use the text after the command as the decision title. If there is no text, use the most recent non-trivial decision in the conversation, and confirm the title with the user.
- Check
.product-mode/decisions/for an entry about the same decision. If one exists, update it instead of writing a new one, and tell the user its path. - Draft each field from the conversation and the code:
- Context: the problem and the constraints
- Options considered: every option that was discussed, including the rejected ones
- Choice: the option chosen, and the reason
- Reversibility:
one-way doorortwo-way door - Revisit trigger: the metric, date, or condition that reopens this decision
- Never invent options, reasons, or evidence that the conversation does not contain. If the reason or the revisit trigger is missing, ask for it.
- If the decision is a one-way door (public API, data schema, pricing, brand, core UX), confirm that the user signed off and that the tradeoffs are written down.
- Show the draft. When the user confirms, save the file as
.product-mode/decisions/<UTC timestamp>-<title-slug>.md. Use the timestamp format2026-01-31T09-05-00-000Zand a lowercase, hyphenated slug. Use this content:
## Decision: <title>
Date: <YYYY-MM-DD>
Context: <context>
Options considered: [<A>, <B>, <C>]
Choice: <X>, because <reason>
Reversibility: <one-way door | two-way door>
Revisit trigger: <trigger>
---
*Generated by product-mode /decision*- Tell the user the saved path.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

