decision
Skill3 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Through one structured decision, settle the work into a user-confirmed, landable shape: the key changes that realize it, how they fit together, and the constraints on them, without execution detail. This file starts, routes, and finishes; Signals fire beside the spine, and each runner owns dialogue. - $SKILL_ROOT, $WORKFLOW_DIR, $PLATFORM, $CACHE_DIR - $DECISION_SKILL_DIR = $SKILL_ROOT/decision - a confirmed $CYCLE_ID </HARD-GATE> Subcommand contracts: module docstrings / --help. Loaded runners inherit these macros; runner-only macros stay local. Spine: O → Q →…
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sohaibt/product-modetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- qbicus/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- emiljuchnikowski/ai-os-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- tsukumogami/shirabetheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- chrisalehman/bionictheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- mhxie/Ateliertheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brief, plan and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- sohaibt/product-mode★ 176same name
- aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace★ 34same name
- chrisalehman/bionic★ 9same name
- mhxie/Atelier★ 5same name
- madebypx/PXOS★ 3same name
- Jsnnmsc/10000x-engineer★ 2same name
- roethlar/AgentGovernanceBootstrap★ 2same name
- Tamircohen28/tamirs-superpowers★ 2same name
- yacb2/aidex★ 2same name
- cerebrocybersolutions/libro★ 1same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- composeSkill
- eval-librarySkill
- lulu-approachSkill
- lulu-betSkill
- lulu-brainstormSkill
- lulu-designSkill
- lulu-execSkill
- lulu-planSkill
- lulu-specSkill
- lulu-tasksSkill
- lulu-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Do NOT proceed until the holder has provided:
- Distinctive: line 34
Do not infer domain constraints from holder SKILL prose or memory.
- Very specific: line 58
Run $DEC_START. Holder stages pass their own --constraints.
- Very specific: line 59
After $DEC_START or a holder binding returns context_docs: run $GATE_CONTROL resolve-context.
- Distinctive: line 106
When both trigger, complete S2 before handling S3.
- Distinctive: line 126
G1.: Ask one question at a time.
- Distinctive: line 148
Do not exit Decision or transition to the next stage until DC succeeds and the user explicitly confirms readiness.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
decision-workflow
Through one structured decision, settle the work into a user-confirmed, landable shape: the key changes that realize it, how they fit together, and the constraints on them, without execution detail. This file starts, routes, and finishes; Signals fire beside the spine, and each runner owns dialogue.
Principles
- Fully expose risks — surface risks arising from any Prior, Constraint, or Assumption.
- Clear unresolved doubts — when doubts remain, offer to resolve them one question at a time.
- Respect evidence boundaries — never present an unverified premise as a verified conclusion.
- User prior over framework — integrate the user's judgments; never let the framework override them.
Contract
<HARD-GATE>
Do NOT proceed until the holder has provided:$SKILL_ROOT,$WORKFLOW_DIR,$PLATFORM,$CACHE_DIR$DECISION_SKILL_DIR=$SKILL_ROOT/decision- a confirmed
$CYCLE_ID</HARD-GATE>
<HARD-GATE name="Domain Constraints">- Pin
$CTXvia$GATE_CONTROL resolve-context. - Apply
$CTX.domain_constraints(objective,role,domain,x_dimensions,omitted_sections) to the session. - Do not infer domain constraints from holder SKILL prose or memory.
</HARD-GATE>Script Macros
| Macro | Command |
$DEC_START | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_start.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" [--conversation-id "<conversation_id>"] [--domain-constraints-file "<path>"] [--session-dir "<session_dir>"] |
$DEC_REOPEN | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_reopen.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" [--permit "<permit_path>"] |
$GATE_CONTROL | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_gate_control.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" |
$GET_PAYLOAD | $GATE_CONTROL get-payload |
$REGISTER_CONTROL | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_register_control.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" |
$REGISTER_COMMIT | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_register_control.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" register-commit --operations '<json array>' |
$RS_COMMIT | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_gate_control.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" rs-commit --gate "<G>" --operations '<json array>' |
$BATCH_RECLOSE | python3 "$DECISION_SKILL_DIR/scripts/dec_gate_control.py" --cycle-id "<cycle_id>" --constraints "<constraints_path>" batch-reclose --payloads '<json object>' |
Subcommand contracts: module docstrings / --help. Loaded runners inherit these
macros; runner-only macros stay local.
Start
- Run
$DEC_START. Holder stages pass their own--constraints; genericdecisionmay omit it. When the platform provides a conversation ID, pass--conversation-id. - After
$DEC_STARTor a holder binding returnscontext_docs: run$GATE_CONTROL resolve-context; pin$CTX; load each returned context document once; declare the bound session and use only the new$CTX.
Router
<HARD-GATE>
Load the routed runner before execution; never rely on memory. The runner owns its context and dialogue map.
Route only from `$CTX` and macro stdout; never access session artifacts directly.
</HARD-GATE>Spine: O → Q → GL → E → D → X → R → DC → $GATE_CONTROL complete.
Dispatch: GATE_COMPLETE → next spine runner; RS / Batch → returned runner. Signals route P / Scan / RS. Scan incremental open or R handle → Release.
Global
| Route | Runner |
| P | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/p-registers-runner/SKILL.md |
| RS | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/rs-realign-runner/SKILL.md |
Gate
| Route | Runner |
| O | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/o-open-channel-runner/SKILL.md |
| Q | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/q-problem-runner/SKILL.md |
| GL | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/gl-grill-runner/SKILL.md |
| E | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/e-direction-runner/SKILL.md |
| D | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/d-decision-runner/SKILL.md |
| X | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/x-full-diagnosis-runner/SKILL.md |
| R | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/r-expose-bets-runner/SKILL.md |
| DC | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/dc-delivery-runner/SKILL.md |
Tools
| Route | Runner |
| Scan | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/risk-scan-runner/SKILL.md |
| Release | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/risk-release-runner/SKILL.md |
| HD | $DECISION_SKILL_DIR/runners/hd-human-decision-runner/SKILL.md |
Signals
When both trigger, complete S2 before handling S3.
| ID | Contract |
| S1 | Any new Register item in dialogue → load P in parallel before replying; resume the current runner on P_COMPLETE. |
| S2 | Any new Register write or gate-payload write → use its stdout as Diff; run Scan incremental. |
| S3 | Any new Register write, gate-payload write, or user input that conflicts with a closed conclusion → load RS. |
Cross-gate
Projection
- Speak in task terms; name internal IDs only for implementation or failure.
- Preserve
$CTX.domain_constraintsvocabulary. Precedence:domain.instruction > role.instruction > projection rules. - Projected text is presentation only; never persist it.
Operating rules
G1. Ask one question at a time. Apply the full Ask Protocol only where the active runner binds it.
G2. Advance only when the active runner's map holds.
G3. Bypassing unclosed gates requires explicit user confirmation; confirmed exit ends incomplete.
Freeze and Resume
Frozen is external-revision-only; $RS_COMMIT releases it. In-session RS stays InProgress.
- Freeze — For a revision, run
$DEC_REOPEN, not$DEC_START. The holder owns any required reopen permit. - Hold — While
Frozen, block ordinary gate advancement and complete RS. - Resume — After RS confirmation, run
$RS_COMMIT; it returns the session toInProgressand names the gate to resume.
Done
<HARD-GATE name="Decision completion">- Do not exit Decision or transition to the next stage until DC succeeds and the user explicitly confirms readiness.
- In a holder, Decision completion closes only the decision node; holder delivery owns the outer transition and delivered references.
</HARD-GATE>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

