remote-host-verifier
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Compare commands, versions, config, and behavior across local and SSH hosts.
- Reads credentials
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-skills-agentsAGENTS.md
- agent-skills-claudeCLAUDE.md
- agent-log-forensicsSkill
- changelog-writerSkill
- chezmoi-driftSkill
- contacts-unifySkill
- decision-logSkill
- dependency-pinningSkill
- django-smoke-alarmSkill
- empathy-auditSkill
- first-contactSkill
- handle-prSkill
- launch-sequenceSkill
- parallel-isolated-app-testingSkill
- post-mortemSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- profile-meSkill
- ralph-loopSkill
- release-operatorSkill
- research-personSkill
- scope-hammerSkill
- second-opinionsSkill
- status-copy-trust-auditSkill
- support-stormSkill
- trust-auditSkill
- visual-qa-loopSkill
- wide-open-brainstormSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use when "works on my machine" is not enough.
- Distinctive: line 40
Run safe checks first:
- Distinctive: line 58
Look for time skew, nearly-full disks, different shells, and PATH order changes.
- Distinctive: line 62
Run the smallest equivalent command locally and remotely.
- Very specific: line 93
If release/install/update was the goal, finish with:
- Very specific: line 107
Use scripts/remote_compare.py to run the same command locally and on one or more SSH hosts and emit text or JSON.
- Very specific: line 113
Use release-operator before publishing a CLI that must update on remote hosts.
- Very specific: line 114
Use agent-log-forensics when the remote host has the richer agent logs to scan.
- Very specific: line 115
Use chezmoi-drift when environment parity points at dotfile or shared-skill drift.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Remote Host Verifier
Use when "works on my machine" is not enough.
Third-order stance: do not stop at whether the command works now. Ask whether this host will diverge, decay, or betray the next agent tomorrow because PATH, time, shell startup, package source, disk, or dotfiles are drifting.
When to Use
- The user names a remote host (an SSH alias such as
devbox) - A CLI install/update/release must work on more than one machine
- You need to compare local vs remote config, version, path, or behavior
- A remote machine has more representative data than the current one
- The task depends on environment parity, time sync, package provenance, or user-level dotfiles
When NOT to Use
- The command is destructive and no dry-run mode exists
- The user hasn't said which hosts you may connect to (don't pick hosts from ~/.ssh/config yourself)
- The user did not name or imply remote validation
- The result depends on GUI state you cannot inspect over SSH
<process>Phase 1: Verify Connectivity and Identity
Run safe checks first:
hostname
command -v <tool>
<tool> --version
ssh <host> 'hostname; command -v <tool>; <tool> --version'Capture exact hostnames. Do not assume an SSH alias points where it did last time. Use non-interactive SSH (ssh -o BatchMode=yes <host> ...) so a password or host-key prompt fails fast instead of hanging; if it fails, report the connection error rather than guessing.
Also capture environment risk signals before trusting the comparison:
ssh <host> 'date -u "+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"; uptime; df -h .; echo "$SHELL"; printf "%s\n" "$PATH"'
date -u "+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"; uptime; df -h .; echo "$SHELL"; printf "%s\n" "$PATH"Look for time skew, nearly-full disks, different shells, and PATH order changes. These are predictive failures: the current command may pass while the next release/update fails.
Phase 2: Compare the Same Command
Run the smallest equivalent command locally and remotely. Prefer JSON output where available.
# path relative to this skill's directory; add --probe-env for time/PATH/disk probes
python3 scripts/remote_compare.py --host <host> --probe-env -- <tool> doctor --smoke --jsonFor a mutating command, use a documented read-only or dry-run mode, or an authorized disposable workspace. A --json flag changes output format and does not establish read-only behavior.
Phase 3: Normalize and Interpret
Strip terminal noise and compare:
- version
- binary path
- config path
- installed package source
- command output
- exit status
- notable stderr
- time, PATH, shell, disk, and package-manager drift
Classify differences as:
- Expected — hostname, local paths, data volume
- Action needed — old version, missing command, config points at stale checkout
- Unknown — needs another command to explain
- Predictive failure — works now but environmental drift makes the next command risky
Phase 4: Close the Loop
If release/install/update was the goal, finish with:
<tool> --version
<tool> doctor --smoke
ssh <host> '<tool> --version; <tool> doctor --smoke'Report only after both sides have evidence. Finish with a verdict per host (PASS / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE), the exact commands run, the differences classified as above, and a small "tomorrow risk" note if drift is present even when the command passes. Stop once each named host has a verdict; don't widen to other hosts.
</process><scripts>Use scripts/remote_compare.py to run the same command locally and on one or more SSH hosts and emit text or JSON. Add --probe-env to include time, shell, PATH, cwd, disk, and uptime probes.
</scripts><interlocks>- Use
release-operatorbefore publishing a CLI that must update on remote hosts. - Use
agent-log-forensicswhen the remote host has the richer agent logs to scan. - Use
chezmoi-driftwhen environment parity points at dotfile or shared-skill drift.
</interlocks>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

