pd-to-issues
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
In this repository71 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- academic-searchSkill
- agent-reachSkill
- anysearchSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brave-searchSkill
- clash-verge-controlSkill
- drawio-skillSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- fireworks-tech-graphSkill
- github-trending-discoverySkill
- html-pptSkill
- humanizer-zhSkill
- ai-news-collectorSkill
- info-andrej-karpathy-rssSkill
- info-daily-hot-topicsSkill
- karpathy-guidelinesSkill
- markdown-to-docxSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- minimax-docxSkill
- minimax-pdfSkill
- minimax-xlsxSkill
- office-docxSkill
- office-pdfSkill
- office-pptxSkill
- office-pywordSkill
- office-xlsxSkill
- ontologySkill
- openclaw-optimizationSkill
- pd-architectureSkill
- pd-bddSkill
- pd-brainstormingSkill
- pd-diagnoseSkill
- pd-docSkill
- pd-executionSkill
- pd-grill-with-docsSkill
- pd-improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- pd-planSkill
- pd-postgresSkill
- pd-prototypeSkill
- pd-puaSkill
- pd-reviewSkill
- pd-rules-checkSkill
- pd-setupSkill
- pd-simplifySkill
- pd-tddSkill
- pd-to-prdSkill
- pd-triageSkill
- pd-zoom-outSkill
- pi-drawioSkill
- pi-githubSkill
- pi-llm-serverSkill
- pi-memorySkill
- pi-painterSkill
- pi-sketch-readerSkill
- pr-academic-searchSkill
- pr-arxiv-watcherSkill
- pr-critic-mentor-reviewSkill
- pr-daily-research-papersSkill
- pr-deep-researchSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
If a PRD has just been published via /pd-to-prd, work from that PRD issue — it already contains the problem statement, user stories, …
- Distinctive: line 22
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code.
- Distinctive: line 33
Prefer many thin slices over few thick ones </vertical-slice-rules>
- Distinctive: line 49
Should any slices be merged or split further?
- Distinctive: line 85
Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
To Issues
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /pd-setup if not.
Process
1. Gather context
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
If a PRD has just been published via /pd-to-prd, work from that PRD issue — it already contains the problem statement, user stories, implementation decisions, and out-of-scope items structured for breakdown.
2. Explore the codebase (optional)
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
3. Draft vertical slices
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues. Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
Slices may be 'HITL' or 'AFK'. HITL slices require human interaction, such as an architectural decision or a design review. AFK slices can be implemented and merged without human interaction. Prefer AFK over HITL where possible.
<vertical-slice-rules>
- Each slice delivers a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests)
- A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
- Prefer many thin slices over few thick ones
</vertical-slice-rules>4. Quiz the user
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
- Title: short descriptive name
- Type: HITL / AFK
- Blocked by: which other slices (if any) must complete first
- User stories covered: which user stories this addresses (if the source material has them)
Ask the user:
- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Are the dependency relationships correct?
- Should any slices be merged or split further?
- Are the correct slices marked as HITL and AFK?
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
5. Publish the issues to the issue tracker
For each approved slice, publish a new issue to the issue tracker. Use the issue body template below. These issues are considered ready for AFK agents, so publish them with the correct triage label unless instructed otherwise.
Publish issues in dependency order (blockers first) so you can reference real issue identifiers in the "Blocked by" field.
<issue-template>
## ParentA reference to the parent issue on the issue tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).
What to build
A concise description of this vertical slice. Describe the end-to-end behavior, not layer-by-layer implementation.
Avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it here and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
Acceptance criteria
- Criterion 1
- Criterion 2
- Criterion 3
Blocked by
- A reference to the blocking ticket (if any)
Or "None - can start immediately" if no blockers.
</issue-template>Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.
Once all issues are published, guide the user to the next step:
- Want to batch-execute all issues automatically (Recommended) → run
/pd-execution(scans incomplete issues, resolves dependency order, implements and verifies each one, and marks them as completed) - Ready to start implementing manually → pick an issue marked
ready-for-agentwith no blockers and start building (use/pd-tddfor test-driven development, or/pd-diagnosefor debugging) - Want to validate the riskiest design decision before coding → run
/pd-prototypeon the first blocker slice, then implement once validated
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

