agentleFS
bouobbouob/sysadmin-skills/skills/statuspage/SKILL.md

statuspage

Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Status page update workflow for IT service incidents and scheduled maintenance. This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a status update", "update the status page", "post maintenance notice", "draft statuspage update", "service status", "notify users about outage", or needs to communicate service status to users. Produces updates following the Investigating/Identified/Monitoring/Resolved lifecycle, compatible with Atlassian Statuspage and Instatus.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Default output directory: ./statuspage/.

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    All status page updates are written in English.

    line 34
  3. Very specific:

    If an incident report exists (from the /incident skill), read it for context.

    line 67
  4. Distinctive:

    No IP addresses, hostnames, or internal identifiers

    line 92
  5. Distinctive:

    No blame or individual names

    line 93
  6. Distinctive:

    Write the update to the output file.

    line 99
  7. Distinctive:

    When posting a "Resolved" update, load the done-ops verification gate first:

    line 122
  8. Distinctive:

    All affected components verified operational?

    line 123
  9. Distinctive:

    Only proceed to the Resolved phase after verification passes.

    line 127
  10. Very specific:

    Use templates from comms skill (references/statuspage-templates.md).

    line 158
  11. Distinctive:

    Write all three drafts to the output file for user review.

    line 162
  12. Distinctive:

    Never include root cause details during an active security incident

    line 169
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not resolve the incident on the status page until ALL affected components are verified operational

    line 172
  14. Very specific:

    If the user is also using /incident, the statuspage updates should align with the incident timeline but contain less detail

    line 174

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Status Page Update Workflow

Draft status page updates for incidents and scheduled maintenance. Produces updates compatible with Atlassian Statuspage and Instatus, following the standard four-phase incident lifecycle.

Related Skills (auto-loaded)

  • comms — tone guidance, audience adaptation, statuspage templates
  • done-ops — verification gate before posting "Resolved" updates

Output

File: {OUTPUT_DIR}/statuspage-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{slug}.md

  • slug: lowercase kebab-case summary, e.g. vpn-india-outage, firewall-maintenance

Default output directory: ./statuspage/. If a docs/statuspage/ directory exists in the project, use that instead. Ask the user if neither exists. A user-specified path takes precedence over all defaults.

All status page updates are written in English. Before writing to file, preview the content for the user in their preferred language.


Two Modes

Mode 1: Incident Update

For active or recent service incidents.

Mode 2: Maintenance Notice

For planned maintenance windows.

Determine the mode from the user's request. If unclear, ask.


Incident Update Workflow

Step 1: Gather Context

Collect from the user (use AskUserQuestion for missing items):

FieldRequiredExample
Which service?Yes"Email", "VPN", "Customer Portal"
What are users experiencing?Yes"Cannot send emails", "Slow page loads"
Current investigation status?YesInvestigating / Identified / Monitoring / Resolved
Priority level?Yes (or derive)P1 / P2 / P3 / P4
Workaround available?No"Use webmail as alternative"
ETA for resolution?No"Estimated 2 hours"

If an incident report exists (from the /incident skill), read it for context.

Step 2: Set Component Status

Map the situation to component statuses:

SituationComponent StatusIncident Impact
Service completely unavailableMajor OutageCritical
Service partially broken (subset of users)Partial OutageMajor
Service slow or intermittentDegraded PerformanceMinor
Planned work in progressUnder MaintenanceMaintenance

Step 3: Draft the Update

Using templates from the comms skill (references/statuspage-templates.md), draft the update for the current phase:

Investigating → Acknowledge the issue, state what is known Identified → State the cause (impact-focused, not technical), share workaround Monitoring → State the fix applied, monitoring for stability Resolved → Summarize what happened, confirm resolution, apologize

Apply the writing rules from the comms skill:

  • Impact-focused, not technical
  • User-facing service names only
  • No IP addresses, hostnames, or internal identifiers
  • No blame or individual names
  • Professional and empathetic tone
  • Include "Next update by {TIME}" for all non-resolved phases

Step 4: Record in File

Write the update to the output file. If the file already exists (ongoing incident), append the new update:

# Status Page Updates: {SERVICE_NAME} — {INCIDENT_TITLE}

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | {YYYY-MM-DD} |
| Service | {SERVICE_NAME} |
| Component Status | {STATUS} |
| Incident Impact | {Minor / Major / Critical} |

## Updates

### {PHASE} — {YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM TZ}

{Update text}

---

Step 5: Verify Before Resolving

When posting a "Resolved" update, load the done-ops verification gate first:

  • All affected components verified operational?
  • Monitoring confirms stability?
  • Duration recorded accurately?

Only proceed to the Resolved phase after verification passes.

Step 6: Review

Present the draft to the user. Confirm before finalizing:

  • Is the tone appropriate for the audience?
  • Any sensitive information that should be removed?
  • Is the next update time realistic?

Maintenance Notice Workflow

Step 1: Gather Details

FieldRequiredExample
Which service?Yes"Email service"
Maintenance windowYes"2026-03-29 02:00-06:00 UTC"
Expected impactYes"Service will be unavailable" / "Brief interruptions"
User action required?No"Save work and log out before 02:00"
Reason (user-facing)Yes"Scheduled system upgrade"

Step 2: Draft Three Notices

Draft all three maintenance communications:

  1. Advance Notice — post 3-5 business days before
  2. In Progress — post when maintenance begins
  3. Complete — post when maintenance finishes

Use templates from comms skill (references/statuspage-templates.md).

Step 3: Record and Review

Write all three drafts to the output file for user review. The user will post them at the appropriate times.


Gotchas

  • Status page updates are public-facing — treat every word as if the CEO and every customer will read it
  • Never include root cause details during an active security incident
  • "Next update by {TIME}" is a promise — if the time passes with no news, post an update anyway saying "still investigating"
  • For multi-component incidents, set the overall impact to the highest affected component
  • Do not resolve the incident on the status page until ALL affected components are verified operational
  • Maintenance notices should be posted during business hours even if the maintenance itself is after hours
  • If the user is also using /incident, the statuspage updates should align with the incident timeline but contain less detail

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.