statuspage
Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Status page update workflow for IT service incidents and scheduled maintenance. This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a status update", "update the status page", "post maintenance notice", "draft statuspage update", "service status", "notify users about outage", or needs to communicate service status to users. Produces updates following the Investigating/Identified/Monitoring/Resolved lifecycle, compatible with Atlassian Statuspage and Instatus.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-changeSkill
- change-requestSkill
- commsSkill
- done-opsSkill
- incidentSkill
- itilSkill
- postmortemSkill
- problemSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Default output directory: ./statuspage/.
- Distinctive: line 34
All status page updates are written in English.
- Very specific: line 67
If an incident report exists (from the /incident skill), read it for context.
- Distinctive: line 92
No IP addresses, hostnames, or internal identifiers
- Distinctive: line 93
No blame or individual names
- Distinctive: line 99
Write the update to the output file.
- Distinctive: line 122
When posting a "Resolved" update, load the done-ops verification gate first:
- Distinctive: line 123
All affected components verified operational?
- Distinctive: line 127
Only proceed to the Resolved phase after verification passes.
- Very specific: line 158
Use templates from comms skill (references/statuspage-templates.md).
- Distinctive: line 162
Write all three drafts to the output file for user review.
- Distinctive: line 169
Never include root cause details during an active security incident
- Distinctive: line 172
Do not resolve the incident on the status page until ALL affected components are verified operational
- Very specific: line 174
If the user is also using /incident, the statuspage updates should align with the incident timeline but contain less detail
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Status Page Update Workflow
Draft status page updates for incidents and scheduled maintenance. Produces updates compatible with Atlassian Statuspage and Instatus, following the standard four-phase incident lifecycle.
Related Skills (auto-loaded)
- comms — tone guidance, audience adaptation, statuspage templates
- done-ops — verification gate before posting "Resolved" updates
Output
File: {OUTPUT_DIR}/statuspage-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{slug}.md
- slug: lowercase kebab-case summary, e.g.
vpn-india-outage,firewall-maintenance
Default output directory: ./statuspage/. If a docs/statuspage/ directory exists in the project, use that instead. Ask the user if neither exists. A user-specified path takes precedence over all defaults.
All status page updates are written in English. Before writing to file, preview the content for the user in their preferred language.
Two Modes
Mode 1: Incident Update
For active or recent service incidents.
Mode 2: Maintenance Notice
For planned maintenance windows.
Determine the mode from the user's request. If unclear, ask.
Incident Update Workflow
Step 1: Gather Context
Collect from the user (use AskUserQuestion for missing items):
| Field | Required | Example |
| Which service? | Yes | "Email", "VPN", "Customer Portal" |
| What are users experiencing? | Yes | "Cannot send emails", "Slow page loads" |
| Current investigation status? | Yes | Investigating / Identified / Monitoring / Resolved |
| Priority level? | Yes (or derive) | P1 / P2 / P3 / P4 |
| Workaround available? | No | "Use webmail as alternative" |
| ETA for resolution? | No | "Estimated 2 hours" |
If an incident report exists (from the /incident skill), read it for context.
Step 2: Set Component Status
Map the situation to component statuses:
| Situation | Component Status | Incident Impact |
| Service completely unavailable | Major Outage | Critical |
| Service partially broken (subset of users) | Partial Outage | Major |
| Service slow or intermittent | Degraded Performance | Minor |
| Planned work in progress | Under Maintenance | Maintenance |
Step 3: Draft the Update
Using templates from the comms skill (references/statuspage-templates.md), draft the update for the current phase:
Investigating → Acknowledge the issue, state what is known Identified → State the cause (impact-focused, not technical), share workaround Monitoring → State the fix applied, monitoring for stability Resolved → Summarize what happened, confirm resolution, apologize
Apply the writing rules from the comms skill:
- Impact-focused, not technical
- User-facing service names only
- No IP addresses, hostnames, or internal identifiers
- No blame or individual names
- Professional and empathetic tone
- Include "Next update by {TIME}" for all non-resolved phases
Step 4: Record in File
Write the update to the output file. If the file already exists (ongoing incident), append the new update:
# Status Page Updates: {SERVICE_NAME} — {INCIDENT_TITLE}
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | {YYYY-MM-DD} |
| Service | {SERVICE_NAME} |
| Component Status | {STATUS} |
| Incident Impact | {Minor / Major / Critical} |
## Updates
### {PHASE} — {YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM TZ}
{Update text}
---Step 5: Verify Before Resolving
When posting a "Resolved" update, load the done-ops verification gate first:
- All affected components verified operational?
- Monitoring confirms stability?
- Duration recorded accurately?
Only proceed to the Resolved phase after verification passes.
Step 6: Review
Present the draft to the user. Confirm before finalizing:
- Is the tone appropriate for the audience?
- Any sensitive information that should be removed?
- Is the next update time realistic?
Maintenance Notice Workflow
Step 1: Gather Details
| Field | Required | Example |
| Which service? | Yes | "Email service" |
| Maintenance window | Yes | "2026-03-29 02:00-06:00 UTC" |
| Expected impact | Yes | "Service will be unavailable" / "Brief interruptions" |
| User action required? | No | "Save work and log out before 02:00" |
| Reason (user-facing) | Yes | "Scheduled system upgrade" |
Step 2: Draft Three Notices
Draft all three maintenance communications:
- Advance Notice — post 3-5 business days before
- In Progress — post when maintenance begins
- Complete — post when maintenance finishes
Use templates from comms skill (references/statuspage-templates.md).
Step 3: Record and Review
Write all three drafts to the output file for user review. The user will post them at the appropriate times.
Gotchas
- Status page updates are public-facing — treat every word as if the CEO and every customer will read it
- Never include root cause details during an active security incident
- "Next update by {TIME}" is a promise — if the time passes with no news, post an update anyway saying "still investigating"
- For multi-component incidents, set the overall impact to the highest affected component
- Do not resolve the incident on the status page until ALL affected components are verified operational
- Maintenance notices should be posted during business hours even if the maintenance itself is after hours
- If the user is also using
/incident, the statuspage updates should align with the incident timeline but contain less detail
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

