agentleFS
bouobbouob/sysadmin-skills/skills/comms/SKILL.md

comms

Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Stakeholder communication templates for IT operations. This skill should be used when writing incident notifications, status page updates, maintenance announcements, or any communication to users, management, or other teams about IT service events. Provides severity-based tone guidance and audience-aware messaging.

9 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every operational communication follows this structure:

    line 58

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

IT Operations Communication

Templates and guidance for stakeholder communication during incidents, changes, and maintenance. All output in English by default; preview in the user's language before writing to file.

Related Skills

  • /incident — loads this skill for incident notifications
  • /statuspage — loads this skill for status page updates
  • itil — provides priority classification that determines communication tone

Core Principles

  1. Impact-focused, not technical — describe what users experience, not what broke internally
  2. Honest but controlled — acknowledge the issue without exposing sensitive infrastructure details
  3. Predictable cadence — always include "Next update by [time]" to reduce anxiety
  4. Severity-appropriate tone — match urgency to priority level
  5. Audience-aware — tailor detail level to the recipient group

Tone by Priority Level

PriorityToneCadenceExample Opening
P1Urgent, direct, action-orientedEvery 15-30 min"We are experiencing a major service disruption..."
P2Serious, informativeEvery 30-60 min"We are aware of issues affecting..."
P3Informative, measuredWhen meaningful updates occur"Some users may notice..."
P4Routine, briefAt resolution"A minor issue has been identified..."

Audience Adaptation

AudienceDetail LevelFocus
End usersMinimal technical detailWhat is affected, workaround, ETA
ManagementBusiness impact + timelineRevenue/productivity impact, resource allocation, ETA
Technical teamsFull technical detailSystems affected, error codes, diagnostic steps
External (statuspage)Impact-focused, no internal namesService status, user-facing impact, ETA

What to Include vs Exclude

IncludeExclude
Affected service (user-facing name)Internal system names, IP addresses
User impact descriptionRoot cause details during active incidents
Current status and actions being takenNames of individuals responsible
Estimated time to resolution (if known)Security-sensitive information
Workaround instructions (if available)Blame or fault attribution
Next update timeSpeculative root cause

Communication Structure

Every operational communication follows this structure:

1. Status — current state (one sentence)
2. Impact — what users experience
3. Action — what is being done
4. ETA — when to expect resolution or next update
5. Workaround — if available

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/incident-templates.md — Full notification templates for each incident phase (initial, update, resolution), by priority level, for each audience type
  • references/statuspage-templates.md — Status page update templates following the Investigating/Identified/Monitoring/Resolved lifecycle, compatible with Atlassian Statuspage and Instatus

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.