x-reply
Skill0 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Grow an X (Twitter) account with replies, which is how almost every account under 10k followers actually grows. Use when the user wants to reply to a post, build a reply habit, "get noticed", comment on a big account, or asks why they get no engagement. Produces reply options that earn a profile click, plus a daily reply plan sized to the account.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- swayamdhawan/x-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- lxyang20131208-star/x-algorithm-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Jakeschincariol/x-agent-skilltheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- Jakeschincariol/x-agent-skill★ 4same name
- lxyang20131208-star/x-algorithm-skills★ 1same name
- swayamdhawan/x-agent★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Read the voice profile (templates/voice.md), or infer the voice from three of the user's posts.
- Distinctive: line 22
Ask who they are trying to reach: the niche, and the 5-15 accounts whose audience they want.
- Distinctive: line 47
No link, no ask: Never link your own thing in a reply to a stranger.
- Distinctive: line 91
Do not write replies that pretend to be a bystander when the account is promoting something, and do not invent a personal experience the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
x-reply
Replies are the growth engine on X. Posts reach the people who already follow you. Replies reach the audience of the account you reply to, which for a small account is where all the new people are. This skill is the one that matters most and the one most people skip.
Before you write
- Read the voice profile (
templates/voice.md), or infer the voice from three of the user's posts. - Ask who they are trying to reach: the niche, and the 5-15 accounts whose audience they want. A reply is aimed at an audience, not at a person.
- Get the target post pasted in full. A reply to a headline you have not read is a reply that lands wrong and costs the account a follower.
What makes a reply work
A reply earns three things, in this order of value:
- a profile click - the reader taps your name because the reply made them want to know who wrote it. This is the actual goal.
- a reply back - it opens a conversation and puts you in that account's replies again tomorrow.
- a like - the weakest outcome, and the one most people optimize for.
Rules that follow from that:
- Add a thing the original did not have. A number, a counter-example, a specific experience, a correction. Agreement alone ("this", "100%", "great point") adds nothing and reads as a bot.
- Be early. A reply 20 minutes after a big account posts is seen by thousands. The same reply four hours later is seen by no one. Speed beats polish. This is the whole strategy.
- Short. One or two lines. A paragraph in the replies is a post in the wrong place.
- No link, no ask. Never link your own thing in a reply to a stranger. It reads as farming and gets muted.
- Disagree well or add well. The two shapes that work: "here is the missing piece" and "this was also true when I {specific experience}".
- Stay in your lane. Reply in your niche. Random replies to whatever is trending build followers who do not want what you sell.
The shapes
Add data "This is also true in {your domain}: {specific number}."
Add a case "{Thing} happened to me too - {one specific detail}."
Refine "The part that gets missed: {refinement}."
Respectful no "I used to think this. Then {specific event} changed it."
Question "{A question only the author could answer, that the post raised}."The loop
1. Take the target post pasted by the user.
2. Write three replies, one in each of three different shapes above, each
under 200 characters, no links, no asks. Say which one you would post and why.
3. Humanize them (x-human). Replies are where AI phrasing is most obvious,
because real replies are messy and short.
4. Give the plan. Size the daily habit to the account:
0-1k followers Reply to 15-20 accounts a day, first 30 minutes after they post.
1k-10k Reply to 10 a day, plus 1 post and 1 reply to your own replies.
10k+ Reply to 5 a day to keep the network warm, and post more.Failure modes
- "Great post!" or an emoji. Nothing for the reader to click on.
- A reply that is actually a post: three sentences, a claim, a call to action.
- Replying to a post you did not read, and repeating a point already in it.
- Farming a big account off-niche for the numbers, then wondering why the followers do not convert.
- Replying only to your friends. That is a group chat, not growth.
- Arguing to win. A reply that makes the author look bad closes the door.
When not to act
Do not write replies that pretend to be a bystander when the account is promoting something, and do not invent a personal experience the user did not have. If they want to mention their own product, that belongs on their own timeline, not in a stranger's replies.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

