x-post
Skill0 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Draft a post for X (Twitter) from a rough idea, using 21 opener patterns and the account's own voice, then clear the AI giveaways before it ships. Use when the user wants to write something for their X timeline: a tweet, a post, an opener, an opening line, "write this as a tweet", "post this to X / Twitter", or asks for opener options. This is for X (Twitter) only, not LinkedIn, Instagram, Threads, or any other network. Returns three candidate openers, one finished post, and a paste-ready block that is never published without an explicit yes.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- terryso/ego-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- schroneko/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- hanzhangzzz/agent-skills-zhtheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- swayamdhawan/x-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- razbakov/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- Jakeschincariol/x-agent-skilltheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- publora/skills★ 68same name
- terryso/ego-skills★ 34same name
- rameerez/claude-code-startup-skills★ 30same name
- SpaceZephyr/allSkills★ 14same name
- win4r/x-post-skill★ 12same name
- tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit★ 6same name
- anneheartrecord/x-operation-skills★ 4same name
- Jakeschincariol/x-agent-skill★ 4same name
- razbakov/skills★ 4same name
- anneheartrecord/charles-skill★ 3same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
If the idea is empty ("write about AI"), do not decorate it.
- Very specific: line 58
1. Offer three openers: Run the idea against hooks.json and pick three that actually fit, from three different patterns.
- Distinctive: line 83
Never invent a figure, a client, or a result the owner did not have.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
x-post
One rough idea in, one post worth stopping for out.
Prep
- Open the voice profile at
templates/voice.md. If it is missing, ask for three posts the user actually wrote, read the voice off those, and save the profile. Guessing a voice is not allowed; a post in someone else's voice is worse than no post. - Open
hooks.jsonnext to this file: 21 opener patterns, each with the move it makes, a filled sample, and the usual way it fails. - If the idea is empty ("write about AI"), do not decorate it. Ask one compact question: what happened, to whom, and what it cost or brought. A post needs a single concrete fact first.
What the feed rewards
X surfaces roughly four lines before the reader has to tap "show more", about 130-170 characters. Two signals carry a post, and both are decided up there: time on the post, and replies plus quote-posts, which the ranking weighs well above likes. So the opener is not the only leverage; the closing line, which invites the reply, is the other half. A link inside the body suppresses reach, so when the user needs a destination, put it in a self-reply. Hashtags do nothing here and read as spam. Opening with "a thread" throws the hook away.
Skeleton
Line 1 the opener, standing alone at truncation width.
Line 2 the release of line 1. Not a ramp into line 3.
Middle one thought per line, single-spaced, white space doing the work.
Pivot one sentence that turns the post, when there is one.
Last a single ask: a precise question, or one concrete action. Not both.Length: 280 characters is the platform ceiling, and 120-240 is where single
posts live. Below about 80 it reads as a stray thought. Anything that truly
needs more room belongs to x-thread. Longer ceilings apply only to premium
accounts, and only when the opener has earned the tap. A one-liner can beat all
of this when the line is good.
Working method
1. Offer three openers. Run the idea against hooks.json and pick three
that actually fit, from three different patterns. Show them as three lines,
and name the one you would run and why, in one sentence.
2. Write the full post on the opener you picked.
3. Clear the AI giveaways. Send the draft through x-human. This is not
optional; it is why the draft is readable.
4. Present the block. Paste-ready inside a fenced block, exactly as it should go out. Under it, one line: what you would change if it flops, and the tell that would show it (for example, "views but no replies usually means the closing line is the weak part").
Dead on arrival
- An opener that only parses once line 2 is read.
- "A thread" instead of a claim.
- Three sentences opening the same way.
- A close of "what do you think?" with nothing to answer.
- A post with no concrete noun: no figure, name, date, or place.
- Emoji used as bullets, hashtags, or a Title-Cased opener.
Hard limit
Never invent a figure, a client, or a result the owner did not have. When the requested claim cannot be supported, write the true version and say what you left out. A post is a promise its author has to keep in the replies.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

